SuperAPI AI Directory

Integrito

Detect, Uncover Hidden AI in Your Texts

Open website

About this tool

Integrito is an AI detection tool used to analyze the document writing process, launched by PlagiarismCheck.org. Its core positioning is not simply to determine whether text was generated by AI, but to evaluate authenticity and uncover suspicious behavior by reconstructing the document's writing process.

In terms of use, Integrito serves multiple roles in educational settings: teachers can use it to prevent cheating, students can use it to prove their own contributions, and schools and universities can use it to maintain academic integrity and reputation. It emphasizes "analyzing how the text was written," rather than relying only on the guesses of AI detection software.

Its main capabilities include: combining Google Docs' View History feature to generate an Activity Report with one click; assessing contributions and editing time, tracking writing stages and the duration of each editing session; presenting the document's revision process to uncover suspicious actions; revealing ghostwriting and hired-writer behavior, and viewing the document's contributors. It also provides plagiarism detection and AI text detection, similarity checking, grammar checking, one-click checks for quizzes and discussions on the Canvas and Brightspace platforms, authorship verification, a citation generator, and more. Its AI detection model is said to be able to distinguish human-written from machine-generated content with 97% accuracy, but the final judgment still requires a human.

How to use it: first install the Integrito Writing Activity extension for the Chrome, Firefox, or Edge browser; log in or register for free with the account corresponding to the browser; open the Google Doc you need to check and click the "Activity Report" button (you need to have edit permission for the document to see the button); then you can view the writing activity report, including writing time, the step-by-step writing process, suspicious events such as pasting large sections of content, and you can compare each stage with the final version.

Applicable scenarios include: teachers checking the authenticity of assignments, students self-checking originality before submitting work, institutions promoting academic integrity standards, and investigating contract cheating and ghostwriting services. When interpreting the report, it is recommended to focus on total time spent, whether the writing stages increased gradually, comparison between stages and the final result, the number of contributors, and to combine this with manual interviews and experience-based judgment, rather than treating the report as the sole basis for a decision.

Limitations and precautions: there is no 100% method for AI detection, and false positives may occur; the report serves only as a guide and requires a final human judgment; edit permission is required to use the Activity Report; specific fee and pricing information is not currently provided.