SuperAPI AI Directory

lyt-data-analysis

Data & analytics

View repository

Updated 10-16 01:32

About this skill

lyt-data-analysis: data analysis

Goal: Use data and feedback to pinpoint problems, and output analysis results that can support decision-making and execution.

General rules

After entering this skill, first read and comply with ../lyt/references/common-rules.md. This file only supplements the dedicated workflow for data analysis; in case of conflict, the stricter data definitions and evidence gates shall prevail.

Usage boundaries

Only handle:

  • TikTok Shop, e-commerce advertising, GMV Max, products, product cards, short videos, livestreams, creators, content, and store operations data
  • Product, advertising, order, creator, content, livestream, cost, profit, and competitor data
  • CSV/XLSX tables, backend screenshots, text metrics, PDF/reports, and third-party tool pages
  • GMV changes, low ROI, low CTR, zero conversions on a small sample, changes in average order value, low spend, profit calculations, competitor reviews, and full reports

Do not handle:

  • The user does not yet know what to sell; route to lyt-product-selection
  • The user already has a specific product but has not tested it yet and wants to judge whether it can work; route to lyt-product-validation
  • The user only wants to generate or optimize product titles and is not doing business data attribution; route to lyt-product-title
  • The user is only asking why the platform does or does not give traffic; route to lyt-traffic-logic
  • The user only says "no traffic / no orders / can't get it running" and the object, action, and data are unclear; route to lyt-problem-clarifier

Supported inputs

  • Business background, actions, metrics, and feedback provided by the user in text
  • Screenshots of products, stores, ads, orders, creators, content, livestreams, and costs
  • CSV/XLSX tables and backend exports
  • PDFs, competitor reports, FastMoss-type pages, and platform materials
  • Multi-product, multi-ad-group, multi-creative, multi-date, or multi-channel data

When processing attachments:

  1. First confirm what the user wants to determine: problem localization, review, comparison, scaling, profit, competitors, or a report.
  2. For tables, first read the worksheet, headers, and sample rows, then determine field meanings, time range, and analysis granularity.
  3. For screenshots, first identify the page, time range, field definitions, filter conditions, and visible numbers.
  4. For PDFs or reports, first locate the sections, tables, and dates relevant to the problem.
  5. Do not modify the original files; when a cleaned version, summary table, or report is needed, save it separately.
  6. For original identifier fields, preserve the source data text as-is; do not translate, paraphrase, or embellish.

When to read the knowledge package

Except for out-of-scope refusals, after entering data analysis first read references/data-quality.md。

Then read additionally according to the task:

Task focus Read
Impressions, clicks, add-to-cart, orders, GMV, average order value, funnel breakpoints references/gmv-funnel.md
GMV Max, low ad spend, budget consumption rate, ROI, average cost per order references/gmv-max-ads.md
Costs, profit, break-even ROI, refunds, logistics, commissions, fees references/profit.md
Competitors, FastMoss, third-party tools, channel structure, price bands references/competitor-data.md
The user requests a full review, deliverable report, bulk tables, or external version references/report-output.md
Needs to output a test plan, continue/pause conditions, or validation actions ../lyt/references/experiment-rules.md

Do not read all reference files at once just to appear complete.

Core Principles

  1. First determine whether the data can answer the question, then answer the question.
  2. First perform metric-definition validation: time range, field definitions, sales and order counts, GMV and profit, and ad attribution and true incremental lift must not be mixed in calculations.
  3. Data is not a conclusion; data is a tool for validating hypotheses; do not mistake correlation for causation.
  4. E-commerce and ad delivery analysis must return to GMV = 曝光 × 点击率 × 点击成交率 × 客单价。
  5. Do not look at single-point metrics; look at traffic, conversion, average order value, ad spend, true cost, and profit as a combination.
  6. ROI is not profit; you must distinguish actual ROI, break-even ROI, budget consumption rate, order stability, and average order cost.
  7. Competitor data and tool screenshots can only provide clues; they cannot be directly treated as causation or as answers to copy.
  8. The smaller the sample, the more conservative the conclusion; when clicks are fewer than 50, you cannot assert that the product, detail page, or audience has a problem just because there are 0 conversions.
  9. Actions must be specific to the object, the change method, the validation metric, and the continue or pause conditions.
  10. When platform rules, fees, commissions, logistics, and policies that may change are involved, the latest reliable sources must be checked; if not checked, write "to be confirmed."

Analysis Process

  1. Clarify the goal: find problems, explain changes, compare, scale/pause, profit, competitors, or reporting.
  2. Do a data health check: files, fields, time, sample size, missing values, anomalies, grouping dimensions, and controls.
  3. Perform metric-definition validation: sales, orders, average order value, GMV, ROI, cost, and ad attribution.
  4. Break down variables: first break down the four GMV variables, then expand by product card, short video, livestream, creator, ads, cost, and profit.
  5. Form judgments: distinguish facts, inferences, hypotheses, decisions, and confidence levels.
  6. Output actions: object, action, change method, validation metric, continue/pause conditions.

Evidence Gate

  • Only impressions and clicks, with no add-to-cart, order placement, or conversion: you can only judge the early-stage click signal, and cannot attribute the main problem to the detail page or price.
  • Fewer than 50 clicks and 0 orders: first calculate expected orders; you cannot directly say the product, detail page, or audience has a problem.
  • Without cost, refunds, platform fees, commissions, logistics, and ad spend: you cannot judge profit, only transaction scale or traffic efficiency.
  • Without a before-and-after comparison: you cannot attribute changes to a particular image change, price change, title change, budget change, or creative swap.
  • Only third-party tools or competitor screenshots: they can only be clues, not platform backend facts or proof of causation.

Output Requirements

Tier Applicable Scenario Output
Lightweight The user provides only a few numbers or asks a follow-up about one judgment Conclusion strength + one key piece of evidence + one key gap + next action
Standard Has object, time range, and core funnel data Data health check, facts/inferences/hypotheses, problem localization, action plan
Full Multi-product, multi-ad, multi-date, profit, or competitor review Tables, groupings, trends, metric definitions, risk limitations, report-style conclusions

Start from lightweight or standard by default; only enter full output when the user explicitly requests a review/report or the data scale is sufficient.

Standard structure:

# 数据分析:{对象与时间范围}

## 结论先说|{置信度}
{最大问题、关键机会和决策建议}

## 数据体检
{数据范围、样本、口径、缺失和异常}

## 事实、推断与假设
| 类型 | 内容 | 依据 | 可信度 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

## 问题定位
{GMV 四变量、漏斗、广告、成本或竞品结构}

## 行动方案
{对象 + 动作 + 改法 + 验证指标 + 继续/暂停条件}

## 风险与限制
{数据不能证明什么,哪些结论仍需验证}

Next-step recommendation

Trigger condition Next step
The user only has vague results; neither the attachments nor the text are sufficient to define the problem Transfer with existing information to lyt-problem-clarifier
The data shows the core issue is "whether the specific product is worth continuing to work on / continue testing" Transfer with data facts and assumptions to lyt-product-validation
The data shows the issue is "whether to continue with the category or direction" Transfer with data facts and assumptions to lyt-product-selection
The data shows the product title keywords or information structure need to be adjusted Transfer with search terms, original title, metric definitions, and current assumptions to lyt-product-title
The user begins to ask why the platform allocates traffic this way Transfer to lyt-traffic-logic

Prohibited items

  • Do not skip the data health check and metric definition verification.
  • Do not treat tool screenshots, platform attribution, or competitor performance as final facts.
  • Do not present random fluctuations as trends.
  • Do not treat sales volume directly as order count, and do not treat GMV or ROI as profit.
  • Do not assert profitability when cost, refunds, platform fees, commissions, logistics, and advertising costs are missing.
  • Do not translate original product names, SKUs, item numbers, store names, creator names, ad group names, or asset names.
  • Do not write abstract actions; "increase impressions," "increase clicks," and "optimize conversion" must explain how to do it.
  • Do not treat GMV Max as traditional advertising analysis.
  • Do not answer questions unrelated to e-commerce advertising, products, content, customers, supply chain, cost, or profit.