Don't ask permission. Just do it.
Generate innovative research ideas grounded in literature analysis. This skill reads existing papers, identifies research gaps, and produces 5 distinct ideas with citations.
Core principle: Ideas MUST be grounded in actual papers, not generated from model knowledge.
Workspace: See ../_shared/workspace-spec.md for directory structure. Outputs go to $WORKSPACE/ideas/.
Step 1: Check Workspace Resources
First, check what resources already exist:
# Check active project
cat ~/.openclaw/workspace/projects/.active 2>/dev/null
Check papers
ls ~/.openclaw/workspace/projects/*/papers/ 2>/dev/null | head -20
Check survey resultscat ~/.openclaw/workspace/projects/*/survey/clusters.json 2>/dev/null | head -5
### Assess Available Resources
| Resource | Location | Status |
|----------|----------|--------|
| Papers | `$WORKSPACE/papers/` | Count: ? |
| Survey clusters | `$WORKSPACE/survey/clusters.json` | Exists: Y/N |
| Repos | `$WORKSPACE/repos/` | Count: ? |
## Step 2: Ask User About Search Strategy
Based on workspace state, ask user:
**If papers exist (>=5):**
> Found {N} papers in workspace from previous survey.
>
> Options:
> 1. **Use existing papers** - Generate ideas from current collection
> 2. **Search more** - Run `/literature-survey` to expand collection
> 3. **Quick search** - Add 5-10 more papers on specific topic
**If no papers:**
> No papers found in workspace.
>
> To generate grounded ideas, I need literature. Options:
> 1. **Run /literature-survey** - Comprehensive search (100+ papers, recommended)
> 2. **Quick search** - Fetch 10-15 papers on your topic now
> 3. **You provide papers** - Point me to existing PDFs/tex files
## Step 3: Acquire Resources (if needed)
### Option A: Delegate to /literature-survey (Recommended)
If user wants comprehensive search:
Please run: /literature-survey {topic}
This will:
- Search 100+ papers systematically
- Filter by relevance (score >=4)
- Cluster into research directions
- Save to $WORKSPACE/papers/
After survey completes, run /idea-generation again.
### Option B: Quick Search (5-10 papers)
For fast iteration, do minimal search:
1. **ArXiv search:**
Tool: arxiv_search Arguments: query: "{user_topic}" max_results: 10
2. **Clone 3-5 reference repos:**
```bash
mkdir -p $WORKSPACE/repos
git clone --depth 1 {repo_url} $WORKSPACE/repos/{name}
- Download paper sources:
mkdir -p $WORKSPACE/papers/{arxiv_id}
curl -L "https://arxiv.org/src/{arxiv_id}" | tar -xz -C $WORKSPACE/papers/{arxiv_id}
Step 4: Analyze Literature
Prerequisites: At least 5 papers in $WORKSPACE/papers/
4.1 Read Papers
For each paper, extract:
- Core contribution (1 sentence)
- Key method/formula
- Limitations mentioned
- Future work suggestions
Long papers (>50KB): See references/reading-long-papers.md
4.2 Identify Research Gaps
Look for:
- Common limitations across papers
- Unexplored technique combinations
- Scalability issues
- Assumptions that could be relaxed
Document gaps in $WORKSPACE/ideas/gaps.md:
# Research Gaps Identified
## Gap 1: [Description]
- Mentioned in: [paper1], [paper2]
- Why important: ...
## Gap 2: [Description]
...
Step 5: Generate 5 Ideas
Create $WORKSPACE/ideas/idea_1.md through idea_5.md using template in references/idea-template.md.
Requirements:
- Each idea cites >=2 papers by arXiv ID
- Use different strategies:
| Idea | Strategy |
|---|---|
| 1 | Combination - merge 2+ techniques |
| 2 | Simplification - reduce complexity |
| 3 | Generalization - extend to new domain |
| 4 | Constraint relaxation - remove assumption |
| 5 | Architecture innovation - new design |
REJECTED if: No arXiv IDs cited, or ideas not grounded in literature
Step 6: Select and Enhance Best Idea
6.1 Score All Ideas
| Idea | Novelty | Feasibility | Impact | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | /5 | /5 | /5 | /15 |
| ... |
6.2 Enhance Selected Idea
Create $WORKSPACE/ideas/selected_idea.md with:
- Detailed math (loss functions, gradients)
- Architecture choices
- Hyperparameters
- Implementation roadmap
6.3 (Optional but recommended) OpenReview Evidence Check
For the top 1-2 shortlisted ideas, validate novelty/positioning risk with openreview_lookup:
- Query using core title keywords or representative baseline paper title
- Extract evidence:
- decision (if available)
- average rating/confidence
- reviewer weakness patterns
- Add a short "submission risk note" section per idea:
- likely reviewer concern
- mitigation experiment to add
- positioning adjustment
Do not claim accept/reject predictions as facts. Report evidence-backed risk signals only.
Step 7: Code Survey
Map idea concepts to reference implementations.
See references/code-mapping.md for template.
Output: $WORKSPACE/ideas/implementation_report.md
Step 8: Summary
Create $WORKSPACE/ideas/summary.md:
- All 5 ideas with scores
- Selected idea details
- Next steps:
/research-pipelineto implement
Commands
| User Says | Action |
|---|---|
| "Generate ideas for X" | Check workspace -> ask strategy -> generate |
| "I have papers, generate ideas" | Skip to Step 4 |
| "Enhance idea N" | Jump to Step 6 |
| "Map to code" | Jump to Step 7 |
Integration
- Before:
/literature-surveyto collect papers - After:
/research-pipelineto implement selected idea - Alternative:
/write-review-paperto write survey instead