SuperAPI AI Directory

lcr-assessment

Data & analytics

View repository

Updated 10-16 08:46

About this skill

Load context

On first use: Read ../../CLAUDE.md to obtain scenario-level configuration (LCR calculation rules/liquidity risk appetite/regulatory requirements).


/lcr-assessment — Liquidity Coverage Ratio Assessment

Examples

→ Example: The user says "Help me calculate the current LCR metric and see whether it meets the standard"; the system should invoke this skill to calculate the Liquidity Coverage Ratio metric.

→ Example: The user says "The regulatory requirement is for LCR to reach 100%, and we are still a bit short. Help me analyze the reasons"; the system should invoke this skill to analyze the reasons for the LCR shortfall.

→ Example: The user says "Help us see whether there are any methods to quickly improve LCR"; the system should invoke this skill to formulate an LCR improvement plan.

Step 1: LCR Calculation Framework

LCR definition:

□ 计算公式:LCR = 流动性资产(HQLA)/ 未来 30 天净现金流出

□ 监管要求:
  → 最低要求:[X]%(中国银保监会/巴塞尔 III)
  → 目标值:[X]%(公司内部风险偏好)

Data cutoff:

□ 计算截止日:[YYYY-MM-DD]
□ 数据来源:[系统名称]
□ 数据状态:[✅ 已核实 / ⚠️ 待核实]

Step 2: LCR Calculation

High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) calculation:

□ Level 1 资产(无折扣):
  → 现金:[X] 万
  → 央行准备金:[X] 万
  → 国债:[X] 万
  → 合计 Level 1:[X] 万

□ Level 2A 资产([X]% 折扣):
  → 政策性金融债:[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万(折扣后)
  → 合计 Level 2A:[X] 万(折扣后)

□ Level 2B 资产([X]% 折扣):
  → [其他合格资产]:[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万(折扣后)

□ HQLA 合计:[X] 万
□ HQLA 等级分布:
  → Level 1:[X]%([X] 万)
  → Level 2A:[X]%([X] 万)
  → Level 2B:[X]%([X] 万)

Calculation of net cash outflows over the next 30 days:

□ 零售存款流出(如适用):
  → 活期存款(稳定):[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万
  → 活期存款(欠稳定):[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万

□ 对公存款流出:
  → 活期存款:[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万
  → 定期存款([X] 天内到期):[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万

□ 其他现金流出:
  → 关联方借款到期:[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万
  → 担保/承诺流出:[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万

□ 现金流入:
  → 到期贷款流入:[X] 万 × [X]% = [X] 万
  → 其他流入:[X] 万

□ 净现金流出 = 总流出 - MIN(总流入,总流出的 [X]%)
  = [X] 万 - MIN([X] 万,[X] 万 × [X]%)
  = [X] 万

LCR calculation result:

□ LCR = HQLA / 净现金流出
  = [X] 万 / [X] 万
  = [X]%

□ LCR vs 监管要求([X]%):[✅ 达标 / 🔴 未达标]
□ LCR vs 内部目标([X]%):[✅ 达标 / ⚠️ 接近目标 / 🔴 未达标]

Step 3: Structural Analysis

HQLA structural analysis:

□ HQLA 充足性评估:
  → HQLA 占总能动资产:[X]%
  → HQLA 占负债:[X]%
  → 流动性资产变现能力:[高/中/低]

□ HQLA 集中度风险:
  → 单一资产类型占比:[X]%([资产类型])
  → 集中度风险评级:[高/中/低]

Outflow structural analysis:

□ 流出构成:
  → 存款流出占比:[X]%([X] 万)
  → 借款到期流出占比:[X]%([X] 万)
  → 担保/承诺流出占比:[X]%([X] 万)

□ 关键流出驱动:
  → 最大流出来源:[描述]
  → 来源金额:[X] 万

Step 4: Risk Identification

Liquidity risk assessment:

□ 🔴 高风险项:
  → [风险 1] — 描述 [描述] — 影响 [X] 万
  → [风险 2]

□ 🟡 中风险项:
  → [风险 3] — 描述 [描述]

Stress scenario analysis:

□ 压力情景 1(轻度压力):
  → 假设:存款流出率提升 [X]%,贷款流入减少 [X]%
  → LCR 压力值:[X]%
  → 评估:[✅ >100% / ⚠️ 接近 100% / 🔴 <100%]

□ 压力情景 2(重度压力):
  → 假设:[描述]
  → LCR 压力值:[X]%
  → 评估:[...]

Step 5: Improvement Recommendations

Recommendations for increasing HQLA:

□ 建议 1:增持国债/政策性金融债
  → 预计增加 HQLA:[X] 万
  → 实施难度:[低/中/高]
  → 成本:[描述]

□ 建议 2:调整资产期限结构
  → 预计效果:[描述]

Recommendations for optimizing outflows:

□ 建议 1:优化存款结构
  → 建议:将 [X]% 的活期存款转为定期
  → 预计降低流出:[X] 万
  → 客户接受度:[高/中/低]

□ 建议 2:延长债务到期
  → 建议:将 [X] 万短期借款展期
  → 预计降低流出:[X] 万

Comprehensive improvement plan:

□ 综合方案预期效果:
  → 改善后 HQLA:[X] 万
  → 改善后净流出:[X] 万
  → 改善后 LCR:[X]% → [X]%

Step 6: Generate LCR Assessment Report

═══════════════════════════════════════
LCR 评估报告
评估范围:[公司/集团]
评估截止:[YYYY-MM-DD]
═══════════════════════════════════════

【LCR 计算结果】
□ LCR = [X]%
□ 监管要求 = [X]% — [✅ 达标 / 🔴 未达标]
□ 内部目标 = [X]% — [✅ 达标 / 🔴 未达标]

【HQLA 构成】
□ Level 1:[X] 万([X]%)
□ Level 2A:[X] 万([X]%)
□ Level 2B:[X] 万([X]%)
□ HQLA 合计:[X] 万

【净现金流出构成】
□ 存款流出:[X] 万([X]%)
□ 借款到期:[X] 万([X]%)
□ 净流出合计:[X] 万

【压力测试】
□ 轻度压力 LCR:[X]% — [✅ 安全 / 🔴 危险]
□ 重度压力 LCR:[X]% — [✅ 安全 / 🔴 危险]

【风险评估】
□ 主要风险:[描述]
□ 风险等级:[高/中/低]

【改善建议】
□ 建议 1:[描述] — 预期 LCR 提升 [X]%
□ 建议 2:[描述]

【目标 LCR】
□ 目标值:[X]%([日期前达成])
□ 预计改善后 LCR:[X]%

═══════════════════════════════════════
置信度:[✅ 高 / ⚠️ 中 / 🔴 低]
LCR 状态:[✅ 健康 / ⚠️ 需关注 / 🔴 需立即改善]
═══════════════════════════════════════

Escalation trigger conditions

  • LCR < regulatory requirement [X]% (an improvement plan must be launched immediately)
  • LCR under stress scenarios < [X]% (liquidity risk intensifies)
  • Level 2B proportion in HQLA > [X]% (quality risk)
  • Single-asset concentration > [X]% (concentration risk)
  • Existence of large concentrated maturity risk ([X] ten thousand maturing within [X] days)
  • Bank credit lines are compressed

Finance Skills — lcr-assessment atomic skill