SuperAPI AI Directory

rfp-response-extraction

Office & productivity

View repository

Updated 10-16 08:07

About this skill

RFP Extraction Skill

Firm Profile (REQUIRED — fill in before use)

These values define who your firm is and how it writes. See SETUP.md.

  • FIRM NAME: [FIRM NAME]
  • WHAT THE FIRM DOES: [one sentence]
  • ROLE BOUNDARY: [what the firm will NOT claim to do — leave blank if none]
  • VENDOR STANCE: [vendor-neutral OR resells/implements specific products]
  • SPECIALIZATION: [domains the firm credibly claims]
  • VOICE: [3–5 adjectives]

Purpose

Parse an RFP stored in SharePoint and populate a structured RFP Tracker List with every actionable item, each broken out by category, flagged mandatory or not, traced to its source location, and given tracking columns for owner assignment and progress monitoring.


Prerequisites

  • The RFP document (PDF, Word, etc.) must be accessible in SharePoint.
  • The agent must have permission to create Lists and List items in the target site.
  • If the package includes addenda, attachments, or a referenced Q&A document, those should also be accessible. Flag any that are missing in the summary.

Step 1 — Read the RFP Document

  1. Locate the RFP file in SharePoint using the path/URL provided. If the package has multiple documents (RFP body, SOW, attachments, addenda, Q&A), list every one and capture filename, page count, and document type.
  2. Extract the full text of each document.
  3. If a document is long, process it in sections but treat it as one document for extraction.
  4. Process addenda last and let them override. If an addendum changes a due date, page limit, or requirement, the later version wins. Diff the changed section against the original — do not assume addenda are purely additive.

Step 1b — (Optional) Capture Solicitation Metadata

Optionally capture solicitation-level facts to an RFP Metadata list (one record per RFP). Skip for simple RFPs unless the user asks.

Field Where to look
RFP / reference number Cover page or header
Issuing organization Cover page
Primary contact + email + phone Instructions to bidders section
Submission deadline (date + time + zone) Instructions section — check addenda
Question / clarification deadline Instructions section
Page limits Instructions / format section
Font / margin / spacing rules Format section
File format and naming convention Submission instructions
Submission method (portal, email) Submission instructions
Period of performance / contract term Scope or terms section
Anticipated award / decision date Timeline or evaluation section
Evaluation approach Evaluation section (lowest price, best value, weighted scoring, etc.)

If a field is missing, write NOT SPECIFIED and flag it in the summary so the team can raise a clarifying question before the question deadline.


Step 2 — Extract RFP Items

Extract every item falling into a category below; record the fields listed.

Categories and What to Look For

Category What to Extract
Question Any question the RFP poses (e.g., "Describe your approach to…", "How does your solution handle…")
Mandatory Requirement Statements using must, shall, required, mandatory, will be required to
Submission Rule How the proposal must be submitted (format, page limits, deadlines, file types, copies, labeling, volume structure)
Evaluation Criterion Criteria, scoring weights, or factors used to evaluate proposals (e.g., "Price will account for 30% of the score")
Administrative Certification (optional 5th — use when present) Representations & certifications, conflict-of-interest declarations, signatory authority, insurance/registration attestations, and similar pass/fail eligibility items

Fields to Record Per Item (write to the RFP Tracker list)

Field Value
Item The requirement, question, or criterion text (verbatim or lightly trimmed)
Category One of the five categories above
Mandatory Yes / No — Yes for anything using obligatory language or marked required
Source Location Page and/or section number in the source document
Owner (blank — assigned later by the team)
Status Not Started (default)

Step 3 — De-duplicate and Normalize

  1. RFPs often restate the same requirement in multiple places. Merge obvious duplicates into one row, but keep both source locations in Source Location.
  2. Split compound items — a sentence asking two distinct questions becomes two rows so each can be owned and answered separately.
  3. Normalize phrasing for readability without changing meaning, but keep enough original wording that the row stays traceable to the document.

Step 4 — Write to the RFP Tracker List

  1. Create the RFP Tracker list items (or update existing ones on a re-run).
  2. Place Mandatory = Yes rows at the top of the sort order if the view supports it.
  3. Do not populate Available Content or Source columns — those are filled by the Content Finder skill in the next step of Phase 1.

Step 5 — Report Back to the User

Provide a summary with:

  • Total items extracted, split by category.
  • Count of mandatory vs. non-mandatory items.
  • Any solicitation metadata marked NOT SPECIFIED (if Step 1b ran).
  • Any referenced attachments or addenda that could not be located.
  • Any ambiguous items that may need human classification.
  • Confirmation that the RFP Tracker list is populated, with a link to it.

Example Summary Output

RFP Extraction complete — RFP Tracker populated.

Items extracted: 31
  • Questions:                 18
  • Mandatory Requirements:     7
  • Submission Rules:           4
  • Evaluation Criteria:        2
  • Administrative Certs:       0

Mandatory items: 9 (flagged and sorted to top)

Addenda processed: 1 (Addendum 2 moved the deadline +1 week — applied)

Items needing human classification: 2
  • Row 14 — compound item split into two questions
  • Row 22 — unclear whether procedural or content rule

RFP Tracker:
   https://contoso.sharepoint.com/sites/Proposals/Lists/RFPTracker

Next step: Run the Content Finder skill to match existing content to each row.

Notes & Edge Cases

  • Scanned / image-only RFPs: OCR first. Flag pages with low OCR confidence.
  • Conflicting addenda: The latest one wins. Note the conflict in the summary.
  • No evaluation criteria stated: Record this explicitly — the Strategy Synthesis skill needs to know weights are unstated so it can infer them.
  • Very large packages: Extract from each document but write to a single tracker. Keep the source filename in Source Location so every row is traceable.