Principle expression
Primary: P16 Supporting: P07, P05, P09
Scope
Own one recurring judgment: how should an agent organize content and action into coherent visual form for a real audience, while inheriting or cultivating the project direction needed to keep related artifacts recognizable?
Visual design is not surface styling. It makes content relations and intended actions perceptible through hierarchy, layout, type, color, imagery, motion, and interaction. Cultivate judgment rather than imposing a house style: no treatment becomes a portable default merely because one project accepted it.
Use a project-declared visual direction or design system when one exists. This skill may interpret and extend it for the present case; it does not replace it.
Principle source
First detect whether the host declares a Sequence and matching interpretations.
When it does, read only host P16, P07, P05, and P09; do not inspect the packaged
snapshot. Only when the host lacks that source may you use the read-only fallback
in references/sequence.md. A live task may select a different
current lead, but it does not create co-primary doctrine.
Domain vocabulary
- Direction: a generative stance with contrasts and a negative boundary, not a palette preset.
- Attention path: the intended order and relative force of orientation, primary action, supporting judgment, context, and recovery signals.
- System: the smallest shared invariants that keep related surfaces recognizable while their functions differ.
- Token: a named repeated semantic decision with at least two independent consumers or a declared theme/context substitution.
- Treatment: the local color, type, spacing, imagery, depth, motion, and component choices that embody the direction.
Governing dependency
content and actions
-> attention path
-> visual hierarchy and layout
-> repeated semantic roles and tokens
-> case-specific treatment
-> observed comprehension and action
Color, type, spacing, grid, depth, imagery, and motion allocate attention and express content relations. Do not choose them independently and force content into the result. A token retains a repeated semantic decision after its role is known; it does not discover the role.
Start
Establish only enough state to select the operation:
Object and artifact state:
Audience and intended action:
Existing direction or design system:
Requested outcome: establish | direction-only | design | review
Available production and inspection capabilities:
If the request and artifact state already identify the operation, proceed without asking the user to choose an internal stage. A small local adjustment inside a clear system remains ordinary development work.
User interaction
- Treat operation names as internal routing controls, not vocabulary the user must learn. Accept an ordinary request such as “redesign this page” or “review why these docs feel inconsistent” and infer the smallest path.
- When the user asks for a change, inspect and modify the real artifact, then verify the affected experience. When the user asks only for critique or review, return evidence and a smallest revision without editing unless they also authorize a change.
- Inherit an existing project direction or design system without requiring a
setup exercise. Use
cultivateonly when a continuing project lacks one and forming it is part of the requested outcome. - Ask only for a decision that materially blocks safe progress. Present the relevant options, tradeoff, and recommendation rather than asking the user to discover the choice space.
- Use the production, browser, rendering, accessibility, and image capabilities supplied by the host agent. State a missing capability instead of replacing real inspection or implementation with prose.
Dispatch
Common:
design— readcommands/design.mdfor a real create, redesign, or visual-system task.review— readcommands/review.mdfor an existing rendered artifact.
Less frequent:
cultivate— readcommands/cultivate.mdto establish a continuing project's provisional direction.shape— readcommands/shape.mdonly when a direction or Aesthetic Case is required without implementation.
With no argument, infer the smallest matching operation. Default to design
for a requested change and review for critique.
Progressive disclosure
Load this file and the selected Sequence interpretations first. Then load exactly one command:
| Operation | Required next context | Conditional retrieval |
|---|---|---|
design |
command, host content/direction/system | presentation model when content hierarchy, attention, layout, or a token system is unresolved; source index and 1–3 detail files only when local guidance is insufficient |
review |
command, owning direction, rendered evidence | presentation model only for an attention/hierarchy diagnosis; never the source index by default |
cultivate |
command, presentation model, design-sources/index.md |
1–3 selected source files plus live official and host-local sources needed by the source field |
shape |
command, host content/direction, presentation model | selective source entries only when contrasts lack local evidence |
The paths above are complete for routing; do not list the skill directory when the operation is known. Never load sibling command files to complete a formal sequence.
Core method
Whichever operation is selected:
- Begin with owning content, the actual audience action, inherited direction, and material constraints; distinguish observed facts from inferred taste.
- Allocate attention before choosing layout or treatment. Balance means unequal emphasis proportional to the user's current decision, not equal visual weight.
- Use references for the decision they change and state what must not be copied. Prefer host sources; built-in references are fallback context.
- Derive tokens from repeated semantic roles. Admit one only when it has at least two independent consumers or a declared theme/context substitution; otherwise keep the value local. Raw values, trends, and component kits cannot establish content priority.
- Inspect the real artifact across representative content, states, themes, and viewports. Mechanical checks admit work to human aesthetic review but cannot accept it.
Boundaries
- Do not infer brand authority, product claims, or factual content from visual work. Route naming and articulation to its owning method.
- Do not prescribe a universal palette, font stack, grid, component language, motion system, or named visual trend.
- Do not copy an external design system's surface or treat the built-in source index as a canon.
- Do not claim image generation, browser operation, rendering, or accessibility verification unless the runtime supplies it.
- Do not turn taste into deterministic lint; the designated human owns aesthetic acceptance.
- Do not make
cultivate → shape → design → reviewmandatory. Enter at the unresolved judgment and stop when its acceptance condition is met.
Completion standard
cultivate: source field, comparative readings, human preference evidence, provisional direction, negative boundary, and disconfirming cases are clear.shape: content, attention path, relation, contrasts, direction, unknowns, negative boundary, and review question can guide production.design: a coherent real slice preserves the intended content hierarchy and attention path, uses justified semantic roles, passes relevant checks, and is ready for human review.review: observations, attention mismatch, owning layer, smallest revision or no-change case, and human acceptance question are explicit.