First read this domain's CLAUDE.md. If a research profile has not been established, first run cold-start-interview, then proceed with verification.
- Extract item by item the name, issuing authority, article number or case number, cited text, date of facts, analysis cutoff date, and applicable region of each citation to be verified. Do not assume erroneous citations in the text to be correct.
- First use public official sources to find the original text and records of promulgation, entry into force, amendment, and repeal; accessible Yuandian or PKULaw MCP may assist discovery and cross-location. Record tool invocation times and returned IDs. Database summaries must be read back against the full text.
- Compare the cited text with the original text item by item, and verify the hierarchy of validity, special-law relationships, transitional provisions, and the point in time of the facts. For cases, additionally verify the adjudication level, whether it has taken effect, whether it has been retried or revoked, its guiding/reference status, and the comparability of the facts.
- Output a verification table:
source_id｜待核表述｜原始来源与定位｜版本和适用时点｜核验状态｜差异｜建议引用方式. Use only the statuses "verified", "partially verified", "not verified", and "not applicable"; an MCP hit must not be automatically recorded as verified. - When the original text of a core provision or case is unavailable, explain the failed tools and times, alternative paths, and affected conclusions; stop making definitive statements of that conclusion.
Check this task item by item against task_context、jurisdiction、temporal、actors、matter、claims_and_elements、authority_and_interpretation、proof、procedure、outcomes_and_enforcement、strategy_and_uncertainty、governance. For applicable items, give the minimum conclusion or pending verification action; for non-applicable items, explain the reasons related to the scope of this verification; for blocked items, record the gap and the stopping path. A brief verification may use a one-line status table and need not expand into a full-case opinion.
Author and Source
- Author: CSlawyer
- Homepage:https://chenshi.ai
- Preparation method: legal-meta-skill; both the legal basis and project rules must be reviewed at runtime.