fact-check

Review: $ARGUMENTS

Fact-Check — verification and quality review

Purpose

Review text for:

Factual errors — verifies claims against sources
Source quality — assesses credibility
Style issues — identifies AI patterns or style breaks
Reference format — checks APA 7

Workflow

STEP 1: extract claims

List all verifiable factual claims in the text:

Statistics and numbers
Quotes and attributions
Technical descriptions
Historical claims
Dates

STEP 2: verify each claim

For every claim:

Search for confirmation from credible sources
Mark as: ✅ VERIFIED | ⚠️ PARTIAL | ❌ WRONG | ❓ NOT VERIFIABLE
If WRONG: propose correction with source

STEP 3: assess source quality

Review the reference list:

Are the sources credible? (academic, established media, primary sources)
Are they current? (post-2022 for AI-related material)
Is APA 7 format correct?
Are full URLs included?

STEP 4: style review

Check for common AI patterns:

"Not just X but also Y"
"It's important to note..."
"In summary..."
Overuse of short fragments as paragraphs
Monotone sentence length

STEP 5: summary

Produce the review report:

## Review Report

**Text:** [Title]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]

### Fact-check
| Claim | Status | Comment |
|-------|--------|---------|
| ... | ✅/⚠️/❌ | ... |

### Corrections needed
1. [Specific correction with source]

### Source quality
- [Assessment]

### Style observations
- [Any issues]

### Recommendation
[ ] APPROVED for publication
[ ] CORRECTIONS REQUIRED (see above)

Use in pipe

When /fact-check runs after /chronicle:

Read the produced text
Run the full review process
If APPROVED: continue to next step
If CORRECTIONS: list them and await feedback

Delegation

For extensive fact-checking, delegate to a research agent:

"Verify the following claims from a text:
[list of claims]

MAX: 5 web searches
RETURN: verification status for each claim with source"

🎯 COMPLETED: [SKILL:fact-check] [Fact-check completed] 🗣️ CUSTOM COMPLETED: [SKILL:fact-check] [Review done]