SuperAPI AI Directory

auskunftsersuchen-art-15

General & other

View repository

Updated 10-15 20:07

About this skill

/datenschutzrecht:auskunftsersuchen-art-15

Purpose

Art. 15 requests are often preparation for a claim (damages under Art. 82 GDPR, applicant discrimination, employee dispute). This skill checks identity, scope and deadlines and drafts a complete, neither over- nor under-inclusive response.

Inputs

  • Mandate (controller)
  • Requester (identity, relationship to the controller)
  • Time of request (start of deadline)
  • Known processing operations (CRM, marketing, HR, accounting)
  • Prior history (application rejected? Termination? Dispute?)

Procedure

1. Identity verification (Art. 12(6) GDPR)

If there are justified doubts, request proof of identity. Proportionate: date of birth + address, not a blanket copy of ID (EDPB Guidelines 01/2022).

2. Deadlines (Art. 12(3) GDPR)

  • 1 month from receipt, extension by 2 months in case of complexity (with reasons provided to the data subject before the end of the first month).
  • Acknowledgement of receipt recommended immediately.

3. Scope (Art. 15(1)(a)–(h) GDPR)

Information about:

a) purposes of processing b) categories of personal data c) recipients / categories of recipients (in particular third-country recipients) d) envisaged storage period / criteria e) right to rectification, erasure, restriction, objection f) right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority g) origin, where the data were not collected from the data subject h) automated decision-making / profiling (Art. 22)

4. Data copy (Art. 15(3) GDPR)

Copy of all processed data, insofar as they do not fall within the scope of the restrictions (Art. 15(4) GDPR; § 34 BDSG).

Format: machine-readable or readable PDF; for electronic requests, electronically by default.

5. Restrictions (Art. 15(4) GDPR; § 34 BDSG)

  • The rights and freedoms of others must not be impaired (in particular trade secrets, third-party data).
  • Special exceptions under § 34(1) BDSG (information contrary to lawyer's duty of confidentiality / pseudonymisation / retention vs. erasure obligation).

6. Cost-free nature / exceptions Art. 12(5) GDPR

In principle free of charge. For manifestly unfounded / excessive requests: reasonable fee or refusal; burden of proof on the controller.

7. Special cases of employee data protection

§ 26 BDSG. Information about internal assessments (application notes) is disputed — prevailing view: yes, insofar as not a trade secret. In an ongoing employment relationship: observe the works council's additional right to lodge a complaint under § 80 BetrVG.

Sources

Statutes

Guidelines

Case Law

  • CJEU, judgment of 04.05.2023 – C-487/21, NJW 2023, 2186 (extensive data copy) [unverifiziert – prüfen]
  • CJEU, judgment of 26.10.2023 – C-307/22, NZA 2023, 1429 (information in an employment relationship) [unverifiziert – prüfen]
  • BAG, judgment of 27.04.2021 – 2 AZR 342/20, NZA 2021, 1233 (applicant information) [unverifiziert – prüfen]

Output Format

DSGVO-AUSKUNFTSERSUCHEN – Antwortentwurf — <Mandat-ID> — <Datum>

I.   Identitätsprüfung               [✅ / ⚠️ Nachweis verlangt]
II.  Fristprüfung                    Eingang: <Datum> | Fristende: <+1 Monat>
III. Umfang (Art. 15 Abs. 1)
     a) Verarbeitungszwecke          <…>
     b) Datenkategorien              <…>
     c) Empfänger                    <…>
     d) Speicherdauer                <…>
     e) Betroffenenrechte            (Standardpassus)
     f) Beschwerderecht              (Standardpassus)
     g) Herkunft                     <…>
     h) Profiling / autom. Entscheidung  <…>

IV.  Datenkopie (Art. 15 Abs. 3)
     Anlage: <Liste>
     Beschränkungen (Art. 15 Abs. 4 / § 34 BDSG):
       - <…>

V.   Offene Punkte
     - <…>

Empfehlung: <…>

Risks / Typical Errors

  • Deadline missed → possibly damages under Art. 82 GDPR, complaint to the supervisory authority.
  • Over-disclosure → violation of third-party rights (Art. 15(4)) → own liability.
  • Under-disclosure → repeat request + threat of damages.
  • Identity verification overlooked → data disclosure to unauthorized parties (Art. 32 GDPR violation).
  • Trade secrets not redacted → § 17 UWG / Art. 15(4) violation.