Do one careful second pass on the changes you just made, and fix the clear issues you find before you declare the work done.
Read the right reference
- Read references/workflow.md for the provider-neutral fresh-eyes review loop.
- Read references/claude.md if this should run in Claude Code.
- Read references/codex.md if this should run in Codex.
- Read references/gemini.md if this should run in Gemini CLI.
Use this skill when
- you just edited files and are about to send a final answer
- you are about to commit or open a PR
- the change involved generated or agent-written code
- the edit touched behavior, configuration, tests, or interfaces
- you want a quick self-check before asking for a second opinion
Do not use this skill as
- a substitute for real verification
- a substitute for a dedicated security audit
- a substitute for an external second-opinion review
If the change is high-risk, run this skill first, then use a separate review skill.
Fresh-eyes workflow
- Reconstruct the exact scope of what changed.
- Re-read the diff and changed files slowly.
- Check the five risk buckets from the workflow reference.
- Run the cheapest meaningful verification you can.
- If you find a likely issue, inspect neighboring code before concluding.
- Default to fix mode: if the issue is clear, local, and easy to verify, patch it immediately.
- Re-run the narrowest relevant verification and repeat the review once.
- If the fix would widen scope, change architecture, or needs human judgment, stop and report it instead of guessing.
- Return what you fixed, what still looks risky, or say explicitly that no substantive issues were found.
Output contract
Return in this order:
- Issues found and fixed, with file references.
- Issues still remaining or explicitly review-only findings.
- Verification performed.
- Residual risk, open questions, or
No substantive issues found.
Keep the review concrete. Do not pad it with praise or a changelog.