Generate hypotheses, experimental designs, and scientific writing across all disciplines.
When to Use
- "Propose hypotheses for this research question"
- "Design an experiment to test..."
- "Draft a methods section for..."
- "Generate research questions for this topic"
- "Write an abstract for these findings"
- Planning new research directions
When NOT to Use
- Running data analysis (use code-execution + scipy-analysis)
- Literature searching (use literature-search)
- Verifying claims (use scienceclaw-verification)
- Pure information extraction (use scienceclaw-ie)
Generation Types
1. Hypothesis Generation
Follow the structured workflow:
- Observation: State the observed phenomenon or gap
- Literature Context: Reference existing knowledge and gaps
- Hypothesis Statement: Formulate as testable H0/H1
- Variables: Identify independent, dependent, and control variables
- Predictions: State specific, measurable predictions
- Falsifiability: Explain what would disprove the hypothesis
- Novelty Assessment: Rate novelty (incremental/moderate/transformative)
Format: "If [independent variable] then [predicted effect on dependent variable] because [mechanism/rationale]"
2. Experimental Design
Include all components:
- Objective: Clear research question
- Design Type: RCT, factorial, quasi-experimental, etc.
- Sample: Size calculation (power analysis), selection criteria, randomization
- Variables: IV, DV, controls, confounds
- Protocol: Step-by-step procedure
- Analysis Plan: Statistical tests, significance thresholds
- Ethics: IRB/IACUC considerations
- Reproducibility Checklist: Materials, data sharing, pre-registration
3. Scientific Writing
Support all IMRaD sections:
- Introduction: Background, gap, objective, significance
- Methods: Detailed, reproducible protocol
- Results: Findings with statistical reporting
- Discussion: Interpretation, limitations, implications
- Abstract: Structured summary (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions)
4. Research Question Generation
From a broad topic, generate:
- Descriptive questions (What/How/When)
- Comparative questions (differences between groups)
- Correlational questions (relationships between variables)
- Causal questions (cause-effect with mechanisms)
Quality Criteria
All generated content must:
- Be grounded in existing scientific knowledge
- Use discipline-appropriate terminology
- Be specific and testable (for hypotheses)
- Include feasibility assessment
- Consider ethical implications
- Acknowledge limitations and assumptions
- Cite relevant foundational work when possible
Citation Format
When referencing prior work in generated content, use:
- Inline: (Author et al., Year) or [DOI]
- Note which citations need verification
- Distinguish confirmed vs. suggested references