Quickly search Peanut's real experiences, views, and cases to add human touch and credibility to content creation.
When to Use This Skill
This skill is automatically loaded when the following scenarios are detected:
- The user says "find my previous experiences" or "are there any related cases"
- An article/script needs support from real cases
- The content feels too "AI-like" and needs more human touch
- A real evaluation of a tool/product is needed
- A personal experience is needed as an opening
Core Features
- Quick Search: Search keywords across all Jike posts (1800+)
- Smart Matching: Automatically matches relevant materials based on the topic
- Provides Rewriting Suggestions: How to expand a short post into long-form logic
- Ensures Authenticity: All materials are Peanut's genuine expressions
Material Library Overview
Data Sources
- All Jike Posts.csv: 1800+ real posts (2025.05-2025.10)
- My AI Exploration Station Posts.csv: AI-related posts
- Extracted Topic Materials: High-quality materials categorized by topic
Main Topic Distribution
- AI Programming Tools: 504 posts (Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, etc.)
- Product Development: 200 posts (HarmonyOS development, Kitten Fill Light, automated operations)
- AI Model Reviews: 150 posts (GPT, Claude, DeepSeek, etc.)
- Self-Media Operations: 100 posts (growth strategies, content creation)
- Technical Learning: 80 posts (programming experience, pitfall records)
Search Methods
Method A: Directly Search Raw Data (Recommended First)⭐
Applicable Scenarios:
- New topics, unorganized themes
- Needs the most original genuine expressions
- Current affairs commentary, trending topics
Operating Steps:
- Use the Grep tool to search
pattern: "关键词1|关键词2|关键词3"
path: /Users/alchain/Documents/写作/写作参考/个人素材库/全部即刻动态.csv
output_mode: content
-n: true
-i: true # 忽略大小写
- Extract core viewpoints From the search results, find:
- Peanut's genuine complaints
- Specific observations and attitudes
- Actual usage experience
- Data and results
- Rewrite into article material
- ✅ Expand into long-form logic (short post → complete paragraph)
- ✅ Maintain genuine attitude and complaining tone
- ✅ Add background explanations and details
- ❌ Do not directly copy the original text
Search Examples:
# 写高德扫街榜相关文章
pattern: "高德|扫街榜"
# 写AI编程工具对比
pattern: "Cursor|Claude Code|Copilot|GitHub"
# 写产品增长策略
pattern: "增长|转化|用户|留存"
# 写技术学习经验
pattern: "学习|掌握|理解|踩坑"
# 写自媒体运营
pattern: "公众号|视频|小红书|播放量|阅读量"
Advantages:
- Most quickly find Peanut's genuine views
- Obtain the most original expressions and emotions
- Suitable for all topics, not limited by already organized materials
- Can find the latest posts (latest as of 2025.10)
Method B: View Extracted Materials
Applicable Scenarios:
- Common topics (AI programming tools, product development, etc.) already have systematic organization
- Need complete experience summaries
- Looking for systematic viewpoints
Operating Steps:
- Open the master index
/写作参考/个人素材库/README.md
- Find the topic
Open
_即刻动态主题索引.md, found related topics:
- AI programming tools? → 504 items of material
- Product development? → 200 items of material
- AI model evaluation? → 150 items of material
-
Select material View extracted files (e.g.
AI编程工具使用心得.md) -
Rewrite and use Refer to the examples in
_即刻动态使用规范.md:
- ✅ Expand into long-form article logic
- ✅ Maintain a genuine attitude
- ❌ Do not copy directly
List of extracted topics:
AI编程工具使用心得.md产品开发经验总结.md自媒体运营实践.md技术学习方法.md
Typical use cases
Scenario 1: Article opening (introduce with real experience)
Requirement: Write the opening for "Claude Code In-Depth Review"
Search:
pattern: "Claude Code"
Find material:
"Claude Code's biggest advantage is context understanding. When changing a feature, it knows which files need to be modified."
Rewrite example:
用Claude Code两周了。最明显的变化是,之前改一个功能,要手动翻5-6个文件,现在Claude Code能一次性找全。这个能力太关键了,特别是接手老项目的时候。
今天聊聊Claude Code值不值得用。
Scenario 2: Supporting an argument (real evaluation)
Requirement: Write "AI Programming Tool Selection Guide", need a real comparison
Search:
pattern: "Cursor|Claude Code|对比"
Find material:
"Cursor is suitable for small projects, Claude Code is suitable for large projects. The price is a real drawback."
Rewrite example:
我同时用了3个月Cursor和Claude Code。结论是:
- Cursor:适合个人项目、小团队。每月20美元,性价比高。
- Claude Code:适合大型项目、复杂重构。每月100+美元,公司用合适。
如果你是个人开发者,先用Cursor。如果公司报销,上Claude Code。
Scenario 3: Case display (real project)
Requirement: Write "Introduction to HarmonyOS Development", need a real project case
Search:
pattern: "鸿蒙|HarmonyOS"
Find material:
"The biggest pitfall in HarmonyOS development is incomplete documentation. The official examples don't run."
Rewrite example:
我之前用Cursor开发鸿蒙App,踩了不少坑。最大的问题是文档不全——官方示例有30%跑不通,错误信息还不清楚。
后来发现,最快的办法是直接看源码。HarmonyOS的组件源码写得挺清晰,比文档靠谱。
Scenario 4: Closing thoughts (personal insight)
Requirement: Write "The Value of Programmers in the AI Era", need an elevated conclusion
Search:
pattern: "AI|替代|程序员|价值"
Find material:
"AI can write for me, but it cannot think for me. The real value is judgment."
Rewrite example:
AI可以替我写代码,但不能替我想清楚为什么要写这段代码。
技术会越来越强,但判断力永远是人的——选什么技术栈、做什么产品、服务谁、怎么增长。这是AI学不会的。
程序员的价值,从来不是敲代码的速度,而是想清楚该敲什么代码。
Rewriting guidelines
✅ Correct rewriting
- Expand the background: short post → complete paragraph, add time, scene, and reason
- Maintain attitude: real complaints and clear opinions should not be "whitewashed" into official jargon
- Add details: specific numbers, timelines, operation steps
- Natural transition: let the material blend into the article without feeling abrupt
❌ Incorrect rewriting
- Direct copying: pasting the short post unchanged
- Over-embellishment: changing "falling into a pit" to "a learning opportunity"
- Losing personality: changing a complaining tone to neutral and objective
- Fabricating details: data that is not in the original material must not be made up
Rewrite example comparison
Original material(Jike post):
"Amap's Street Scan list forced a pop-up during National Day, so disgusting. The product manager's brain has a hole."
❌ Incorrect rewriting(over-embellishment):
"Amap still has room for improvement in user experience, especially the design of the pop-up feature needs to be more user-friendly."
✅ Correct rewriting(maintain attitude, expand details):
"On National Day, I opened Amap, and the Scan Street Ranking event page was force-popped up, and I couldn't close it without tapping "Join." I just wanted navigation—why force me to join an event?
This design logic is baffling. What is the user's core need when opening navigation? It's to quickly start navigating, not to join the Scan Street Ranking. Forced pop-ups only create resentment and don't help event participation rates either—will people who were forced to tap "Join" really go scan streets?
The core of product design is respecting user intent, not pushing KPIs."
Notes
1. Authenticity principle
- ✅ All materials are real; do not fabricate or exaggerate
- ✅ Data, times, and tool names must be accurate
- ✅ Do not change other people's experiences into Huasheng's
2. Timeliness principle
- ✅ Pay attention to the time span (2025.05-2025.10)
- ✅ Avoid using outdated information (such as "GPT-3.5 is mainstream")
- ✅ When product features are involved, verify whether they still apply
3. Rewriting principle
- ✅ Must be rewritten into long-form logic; do not copy directly
- ✅ Maintain Huasheng's real attitude and ranting tone
- ✅ Add background, details, and thought process
- ❌ Do not "whitewash" it into official phrasing or neutral objectivity
4. Frequency of use
- ✅ Use at least 1-2 real materials per article
- ✅ The beginning, case examples, and ending are the best places to use them
- ❌ Do not rely excessively; maintain originality
Frequently asked questions
Q1: What should I do if I can't find relevant materials by searching?
A:
- Try adjusting keywords (synonyms, related concepts)
- Expand the search scope (search broader concepts)
- Check the topic index to see whether there are related categories
- If there really are none, you can skip the materials and supplement through search and analysis
Q2: What should I do if the materials do not perfectly match the article topic?
A:
- Extract the core viewpoint and attitude rather than the specific content
- Introduce it by analogy ("This reminds me of before...")
- Use it as a counterexample or contrast
Q3: How do I judge whether materials are outdated?
A:
- Check time markers (publish time is in the CSV)
- When product features are involved, search to verify the latest status
- If in doubt, note "at the time..." or "back in month X..."
Q4: Must every article use personal materials?
A:
- Not mandatory, but strongly recommended
- Real materials are the most effective way to reduce the AI feel
- Use 1-2 instances at least in the beginning or in the case section
Technical implementation
Grep search example
# 搜索关键词(支持正则表达式)
grep -i "Cursor\|Claude Code" /Users/alchain/Documents/写作/写作参考/个人素材库/全部即刻动态.csv
# 搜索并显示行号
grep -in "增长\|转化" /Users/alchain/Documents/写作/写作参考/个人素材库/全部即刻动态.csv
# 搜索并显示上下文(前后3行)
grep -i -C 3 "鸿蒙\|HarmonyOS" /Users/alchain/Documents/写作/写作参考/个人素材库/全部即刻动态.csv
Use the Grep tool in Claude Code
Grep工具参数:
pattern: "关键词1|关键词2"
path: /Users/alchain/Documents/写作/写作参考/个人素材库/全部即刻动态.csv
output_mode: content
-n: true
-i: true
-C: 2 # 显示上下文
Reference resources
/写作参考/个人素材库/README.md- Master index (start here)/写作参考/个人素材库/全部即刻动态.csv- Raw data (1800+ items)/写作参考/个人素材库/_即刻动态主题索引.md- Topic categories/写作参考/个人素材库/_即刻动态使用规范.md- Rewriting guidelines and examples
Successful cases
- "Why the Best Content Is All Useless": used MrBeast case materials, adding a sense of authenticity
- "How a Team Burning Billions of Tokens a Month Uses Claude Code": used multiple instances of Claude Code usage experience, with high credibility
Last updated: 2025-11-07 Applicable projects: WeChat public account writing, video scripts Maintainer: Huasheng