SuperAPI AI Directory

problem-classifier

Data & analytics

View repository

Updated 10-16 02:32

About this skill

Preconditions
  • planning/parse/problem_parse.json exists and maps every Qx to an output.
  • Material framing ambiguities are visible.

Read legacy parse paths only during migration.

Task Types
  • evaluation/ranking;
  • prediction/estimation;
  • optimization/decision;
  • mechanism/dynamics;
  • classification/clustering;
  • graph/routing/network;
  • simulation/scenario;
  • descriptive/inference;
  • mixed.

Detailed cues are in references/task-type-guide.md.

Workflow
  1. Classify from the required output, decision structure, constraints, and relationships—not keywords alone.
  2. Assign:
    • primary type;
    • optional secondary type;
    • confidence;
    • evidence from the parse;
    • consequences for validation and deliverables.
  3. Identify mixed or ambiguous framings that would change what the team can claim.
  4. For a load-bearing ambiguity, invoke one choice card explaining consequences. Do not silently settle it.
  5. Save planning/classification/problem_classification.json.
  6. Record the human framing decision in methods/Qx/qx_decisions.jsonl, or in planning/framing_decisions.jsonl when the Qx method directory does not yet exist.
Output Contract
{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "subquestions": [
    {
      "id": "Q1",
      "primary_type": "evaluation",
      "secondary_type": null,
      "confidence": "high",
      "evidence": [],
      "required_validation": [],
      "framing_decision_id": null,
      "risks": []
    }
  ]
}
Rules
  • Do not propose or choose methods.
  • Do not classify only from nouns such as “forecast” or “optimal”; verify the required output.
  • A subquestion may be mixed, but avoid listing many types without prioritization.
  • Human framing is required when alternative classifications lead to materially different outputs or claims.
  • Do not create a long taxonomy report when the JSON record is sufficient.
Verification
  • Every Qx has one primary type.
  • Mixed/secondary types are justified.
  • Classification evidence resolves to the parse.
  • Ambiguous framing is human-confirmed or remains a blocker.
  • No algorithm selection leaked into classification.
Reference
  • references/task-type-guide.md