ACTION REQUIRED (execute immediately after reading)
NOW: Read../field-journal/precedent-pentest.md— confirm that this skill's operations are authorized routine operationsNOW: Confirm whether the current task falls within this skill's scope of applicabilityNEXT: Read../tool-index.md, verify tool availability and actual pathsNEXT: When tools are missing, call bootstrap; do not guess pathsACT: Enter the first step of the "Workflow" and execute it; do not stop at the confirmation state
SBOM / SCA / CI/CD pipeline / dependency provenance Regulation-driven: U.S. Executive Order SBOM, Chinese national standards, EU CRA
Applicable Scenarios
- Software supply chain security assessment
- Open source dependency vulnerability scanning and verification
- CI/CD pipeline security audit
- Container image security analysis
- Third-party component compliance review
- Build artifact provenance and integrity verification
Six-Layer Supply Chain Governance Framework
Layer 1: 源码信任评估 → 上游仓库/维护者/发布历史审查
Layer 2: 构建管道集成 → CI/CD 安全门禁、签名验证
Layer 3: 制品分发完整性 → 签名、校验和、SBOM 附加
Layer 4: 运行时保护 → 容器扫描、准入控制
Layer 5: 持续监控 → CVE 实时追踪、漏洞可达性分析
Layer 6: 事件响应 → 供应链攻击应急、回滚策略
Workflow
1. SBOM Generation and Audit
生成 SBOM:
□ CycloneDX 格式: cdxgen → bom.json
□ SPDX 格式: sbom-tool generate
□ Syft: syft <image|dir> -o spdx-json
审计要点:
□ 是否存在未知/未授权的依赖
□ 是否存在已废弃/停止维护的包
□ 许可证冲突检测
□ 直接依赖 vs 传递依赖清单
□ 每个组件的发布时间线和维护者状态
2. Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
# OSV-Scanner(免费、Google 维护)
osv-scanner scan -r . --format json
# OWASP Dependency-Track(企业级持续监控)
docker run -p 8080:8080 dependencytrack/apiserver
# → 上传 SBOM → 自动匹配 NVD/OSV/GitHub Advisory
# Snyk(商业)
snyk test --all-projects
snyk monitor # 持续监控
# Trivy(容器 + 依赖 + IaC)
trivy fs . # 文件系统扫描
trivy image nginx # 容器镜像
trivy config . # IaC 配置
3. Vulnerability Reachability Verification
SCA 告警 ≠ 实际风险!大多数 SCA 工具只有 ~15% 的告警是实际可达的。
验证步骤:
1. 用 Dependency-Track 或 Trivy 获取 CVE 列表
2. 筛选 CVSS ≥ 7.0 的漏洞
3. 对有 PoC 的 CVE 做可达性分析
- Code Property Graph 切片: 追踪用户输入到漏洞函数的路径
- DEPTEX 方法: EPD (Execution Path Dominance) + LLM 语义验证
4. 在隔离环境中验证 PoC
5. 对可达的漏洞按实际影响排序修复优先级
Tool reference:
- CodeQL: GitHub code queries → data flow analysis
- Snyk Code: reachability tagging
- DEPTEX: LLM-assisted context-aware risk assessment
4. CI/CD Pipeline Security
安全检查点:
□ 代码提交 → pre-commit hook: gitleaks (密钥扫描)
□ PR 阶段 → SCA 扫描 (Trivy/OSV-Scanner)
□ 构建阶段 → 制品签名 (cosign)
□ 推送阶段 → SBOM 附加 (syft + attest)
□ 部署阶段 → 准入控制 (OPA/Kyverno + 镜像扫描)
□ 运行时 → 持续漏洞监控 (Dependency-Track)
管道自身安全:
□ Pipeline as Code 审计(GitHub Actions / GitLab CI 配置注入)
□ Runner 隔离(防止恶意构建突破容器)
□ 密钥管理(Actions Secrets / Vault,禁止硬编码)
□ 第三方 Action 审查(锁定 commit SHA,非 tag)
5. Container Image Security
# Dockerfile 审计
hadolint Dockerfile
# 镜像扫描(多层:OS + 应用依赖 + 配置)
trivy image --severity HIGH,CRITICAL nginx:latest
# 最小基础镜像
# 优先: distroless → alpine → slim → 避免 latest
docker scout quickview nginx:latest
# 镜像签名
cosign sign --key cosign.key myimage:tag
cosign verify --key cosign.pub myimage:tag
6. Third-Party Dependency Review
新增依赖 Checklist:
□ 维护状态:最近 6 个月有提交?维护者活跃度?
□ 安全历史:过去有无被植入恶意代码?
□ 依赖树:引入后新增多少传递依赖?
□ 许可证:与项目许可证兼容?
□ 替代方案:有无更安全的替代(Snyk Advisor / Socket.dev 评分)?
风险评估矩阵:
高维护 × 低依赖数 × 兼容许可证 → 低风险
低维护 × 高依赖数 × 许可证冲突 → 高风险
Toolchain
| Tool | Purpose | Acquisition |
|---|---|---|
| OWASP Dependency-Track | Enterprise-grade continuous SCA | docker pull dependencytrack/apiserver |
| OSV-Scanner | Free SCA (OSV.dev ecosystem) | go install github.com/google/osv-scanner |
| Trivy | Image + dependency + IaC scanning | apt install trivy |
| Syft | SBOM generation | curl -sSfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anchore/syft/main/install.sh |
| cdxgen | CycloneDX SBOM generation | npm install -g @cyclonedx/cdxgen |
| Cosign | Container signing | go install github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2/cmd/cosign |
| Gitleaks | Secret/credential scanning | go install github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks/v8 |
| Snyk | Commercial SCA + reachability | npm install -g snyk |
| CodeQL | Code queries + data flow | Built into GitHub Actions |
Reference
references/sbom-sca-methodology.md— SBOM + SCA methodologyreferences/cicd-pipeline-security.md— CI/CD pipeline security audit
Task Completion Self-Check (MUST pass before claiming completion)
- Did I execute every step in the workflow (rather than only reading it)?
- Did I use real tool paths based on
tool-index? - Did I produce reproducible evidence (commands/scripts/screenshots/reports)?
- Did I complete and write back the Checklist items required by RULES?