SuperAPI AI Directory

patent-write

General & other

View repository

Updated 10-16 01:48

About this skill

Chinese invention patent drafting

When to use

  • The user wants to write a Chinese invention patent
  • The user wants to supplement a certain section, such as the abstract, claims, or specific embodiments
  • The user has provided a reference patent and hopes to distill the writing method, structure, and expression patterns
  • The user wants to consolidate, converge, or check terminology consistency in an existing patent draft

Step 1: Identify the task type

User expression / keywords Execution file
Complete patent, full text, complete specification, help me write the entire patent reference/full-patent.md
Title, name, title optimization, title convergence reference/title.md
Abstract reference/abstract.md
Background technology, defects of existing technology reference/background.md
Summary of the invention, technical solution, beneficial effects reference/invention-content.md
Claims, independent claims, dependent claims reference/claims.md
Description of drawings, figure numbers reference/figures-desc.md
Drawing creation (Draw.io black-and-white Chinese) reference/figures-drawio.md
Specific embodiments, examples reference/implementation.md
Consolidation, checking, terminology consistency, self-check reference/review.md
Reference patent distillation, imitation writing patterns, structure extraction reference/distill.md

Step 2: Collect input

Prioritize collecting the following materials, and supplement whatever is missing:

  • Technical solution description: what problem is solved, what the core means are
  • Existing draft: any existing part of the title, abstract, claims, or specification
  • Reference patent: used to distill structure, language, and granularity, not to be directly copied
  • Drawings or flowcharts: module diagrams, flowcharts, architecture diagrams, sequence diagrams
  • Innovation points: specific differences and effects relative to existing technology

If the user wants to write the full text, proceed by default in the following order:

  1. First extract the innovation points and the subject of protection
  2. First build the skeleton of the claims
  3. Then write the abstract and summary of the invention
  4. Then expand the specific embodiments
  5. Finally perform consolidation and consistency checking

Step 3: Execute and output

  • Read the writing rules, structure templates, and taboos of the corresponding reference
  • Write strictly around the materials provided by the user, and do not add nonexistent experimental data, implementation results, or hardware parameters
  • In the same round of output, provide finished products as much as possible, not just principles
  • If the information is insufficient to support formal patent text, first list the missing items, then provide an actionable draft

General principles

  • Do not fabricate: do not write modules, steps, experimental data, or performance indicators that are not in the materials
  • Structure first: first define the protection skeleton, then write the expanded text
  • Unified terminology: use only one main designation for the same object throughout the text
  • Technical correspondence: background defects, invention objectives, technical solution, and beneficial effects must correspond one to one
  • Write less empty talk: avoid having only functional results without an implementation path
  • Broad first, then narrow: the independent claim summarizes the core solution, and the dependent claims then refine the steps, conditions, modules, and formulas

High-frequency patterns distilled from reference patents

  • Titles should preferably follow the common naming structure of "method, system, device, and medium"
  • Write the abstract as "disclosed content + core steps + technical effects", and do not copy the long sentence patterns of the claims
  • The background art should describe the specific defects of existing methods, not just industry trends
  • In the summary of the invention, first write the purpose, then the technical solution, then the beneficial effects
  • Claim 1 is responsible for the overall process or core modules; dependent claims are responsible for detailing sub-steps, parameters, constraints, and dependency relationships
  • The specific embodiments should form a closed loop with the drawings, step numbers, and module names