pullback_opportunity_finder_skill

Pullback Opportunity Finder Skill

Data dependencies and execution prerequisites

It is recommended to use Wind wind-mcp-skill to obtain underlying data. Before execution, first check whether there is already wind-mcp-skill; if not, prompt the user to install:

# GitHub
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

# Gitee 镜像（国内）
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

Skill positioning

This skill is used to screen candidate stocks whose main upward logic is still intact and whose trend has not yet been broken, but whose price has undergone a phase of pullback. The output focus is not to mechanically look for stocks with large declines, but to identify which pullbacks are healthy consolidation and which are merely downward continuations before Weak rebounds, thereby helping users base "dip buying" on judgments of trend and structure.

Function overview

The core function of this skill is: to find candidate stocks with sufficient pullback but an unbroken trend, and to locate dip-buying observation zones.

It emphasizes combining trend integrity, pullback depth, support signals, catalyst continuity, and risk boundaries into an integrated assessment, avoiding mistaking all declines for opportunities.

Use scenarios

• After a strong sector pulls back, it is necessary to determine which individual stocks are still worth continuing to track.
• The user hopes to find "second boarding" opportunities rather than buying at highs.
• The trading team needs to update the dip-buying watchlist intraday or at day-end.
• Users who already have positions want to distinguish normal pullbacks from trend weakening.

Working principles

1. The premise of a pullback opportunity is that the original main trend is still valid; one cannot look only at the decline while ignoring the trend.
2. It is necessary to distinguish among the three types of pullback nature: "strong consolidation," "trend damage," and "sentiment clearing."
3. All dip-buying conclusions should be accompanied by an observation range, confirmation signals, and error-stop boundaries.
4. If a pullback lacks support or the catalyst is disproven, it should be regarded first as risk rather than opportunity.
5. The main text only presents analysis results and does not explicitly describe internal implementation details.

Execution process

Step 1: Confirm the stock pool and the definition of pullback

First clarify which type of pullback opportunity is being sought this time:

• It is a technical pullback of a previously leading stock
• It is a rapid repair opportunity for a trending stock after a news shock
• It is looking for the few strong stocks that remain resilient after a sector cools down
• Or is it a phased washout opportunity within a medium-term main upward wave

At the same time, confirm whether the user is focused on daily-level, weekly-level, or shorter-cycle pullbacks.

Step 2: Confirm whether the original trend holds

For candidate stocks, first review whether the rise before the pullback had a real trend basis:

• Whether there was a continuous strong structure rather than a pulse-like surge
• Whether there is support from mainlines such as performance, prosperity, policy, or theme reinforcement
• Whether the volume-price relationship during the rising phase was healthy
• Whether the stock has historically shown behavioral characteristics of continuing to strengthen after a pullback

If the original rise itself lacked trend quality, subsequent pullbacks should not easily be defined as opportunities.

Step 3: Assess whether the pullback depth and pace are healthy

The key point of a healthy pullback is not "falling enough," but "retreating in an orderly way." Observe:

• Whether the pullback magnitude is still within an acceptable range relative to the previous rise
• Whether the pullback speed is a sharp drop clearing out positions, or a moderate low-volume consolidation
• Whether the pullback breaks below an important moving average, the lower edge of a platform, or a key low
• Whether there is obvious volume blowout out of control or chip stampede during the decline

If the pullback is too deep or the rhythm is unbalanced, priority should be given to shifting to risk observation rather than a dip-buying candidate.

Step 4: Find support zones and absorption signals

Pullback opportunities must be tied to specific price zones and behavioral signals. Key confirmations:

• Which range may form effective support
• Whether, when falling back to the support zone, there is shrinking volume and stabilization, lower-shadow repair, or active absorption
• Whether stocks in the same sector simultaneously show signs of stabilizing
• If there is a rebound, whether the rebound quality shows that funds are willing to re-enter

Without absorption, there is only decline; price merely approaching support does not mean the opportunity has already appeared.

Step 5: Verify whether the catalyst is still effective

The key to a valid dip-buying setup is that the original main line has not been fundamentally damaged. Re-verify:

• Whether the core narrative driving the rise still holds
• Whether the pullback stems from staged profit-taking rather than weakening fundamentals
• Whether there will still be an event window in the coming period that continues to strengthen the logic
• Whether market preference has already rotated away from this style

If the catalyst has clearly dulled or reversed, the priority for dip buying should be lowered.

Step 6: Distinguish the “observation zone” from the “confirmation point”

High-quality dip buying does not mean buying as soon as the level is reached, but rather breaking the process into two layers:

• Observation zone: the price area where the stock price enters a range worthy of close monitoring
• Confirmation point: evidence of price-volume repair, sector resonance, or renewed strength

At the same time, clearly write down:

• Under what circumstances the tracking level can be upgraded
• Under what circumstances the original dip-buying judgment should be abandoned
• If the optimal position is missed, whether there is still a second entry opportunity

Step 7: Form candidate ranking and strategy recommendations

Rank candidates comprehensively by “trend integrity + pullback health + absorption quality + catalyst continuity,” and clearly distinguish:

• Pullback opportunities that can be actively observed
• Observation targets suitable only for waiting for confirmation
• Risk targets whose pullback appears sufficient but which in fact should not be bought on dips

Step 8: Integrate into a finished pullback opportunity draft

The final output should help users know “which stocks can wait, where to wait, what signals to watch, and under what circumstances to stop waiting.” The main text should present only conclusions, evidence, and the observation framework, not intermediate drafts.

Output structure

---

Pullback opportunity screening ({YYYY-MM-DD})

I. 30-second conclusion

• Most noteworthy pullback targets: {name list}
• Current healthiest pullback type: {mild consolidation / rapid clearing / platform pullback}
• Overall strategy bias: {actively wait for confirmation / observe only / temporarily no dip buying}
• Biggest risk point: {one sentence}

II. Candidate pool overview

Stock	Original trend quality	Current pullback nature	Support zone	Confirmation signal	Priority
{Target 1}	{strong/medium/weak}	{healthy/average/weak}	{range}	{content}	{A/B/C}
{Target 2}	{Level}	{Nature}	{Range}	{Content}	{Level}

III. Breakdown of Key Candidates

{Stock Name}

• Original Mainline: {Content}
• Reason for This Round of Pullback: {Content}
• Support Observation Zone: {Content}
• Follow-Through Signal: {Content}
• Upgrade Confirmation Conditions: {Content}
• Invalidation Boundary: {Content}

IV. Sector and Environment Assessment

• Sector Status: {Content}
• Whether Market Style Supports Buying on Dips: {Content}
• Whether There Is a Basis for Secondary Strengthening: {Content}

V. Observation and Response Checklist

• {Observation Point 1}
• {Observation Point 2}
• {Observation Point 3}

VI. Risk Warnings

• {Risk 1}
• {Risk 2}
• {Risk 3}

---

Quality Requirements

1. Pullback candidates must be based on the premise that the original trend remains valid.
2. A support observation zone and confirmation signals must be provided; vague direction alone is not acceptable.
3. A distinction must be made between "pullback has reached position" and "pullback has ended."
4. If the pullback has already evolved into trend damage, the buy-on-dips logic should be explicitly rejected.
5. The output must serve subsequent observation and disciplined execution, and avoid being written as general market commentary.