intraday_abnormal_move_alert_skill

Intraday Abnormal Move Alert Skill

Data dependencies and execution prerequisites

It is recommended to use Wind wind-mcp-skill to obtain the underlying data. Before execution, first check whether there is already a local wind-mcp-skill; if not, prompt the user to install:

# GitHub
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

# Gitee 镜像（国内）
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

Skill positioning

This skill is used to provide a quick-judgment result of "explain first, then grade, then prompt action" when rapid rises, rapid declines, volume shocks, or abnormal turnover appear during the trading session. The core goal is to help users determine whether this movement is noise, event-driven, or an effective change worth continued tracking.

Execution flow

Step 1: Define the abnormal movement object and pattern

First clarify which stock, which time period, and which type of abnormal movement. The abnormal movement pattern should at least clearly describe the following information:

• Price direction: rapid spike, sharp drop, surge and retreat, bottoming and rebound, amplified oscillation
• Magnitude and speed: whether short-term fluctuations significantly deviate from the norm
• Trading changes: whether there is synchronized volume expansion, volume contraction, or increased turnover
• Position: whether it occurs at a prior high, prior low, dense moving-average zone, or trend continuation zone

Step 2: Investigate explicit drivers

Prioritize checking whether there is newly added information that can directly explain the abnormal movement, focusing on:

• Company announcements, industry news, policy news, regulatory developments
• Financial reports, earnings forecasts, product launches, major contracts, suspension and resumption information
• Sector-wide abnormal movements, index or futures linkage, overseas mapping

If no obvious catalyst can be found, also clearly state that "no newly added explicit driver has been found yet"; do not assume there must be news.

Step 3: Determine whether the abnormal movement has sector or sentiment resonance

Analyze whether the stock's abnormal movement is an isolated event or group behavior, focusing on answering:

• Whether the same sector is moving abnormally in sync
• Whether theme heat is spreading
• Whether it is consistent with the market's main direction
• Whether it is merely capital huddling in a local area or switching at high levels

Isolated abnormal movements and sector resonance have completely different meanings and must be distinguished.

Step 4: Assess sustainability and credibility

Assess the quality of the abnormal movement from four perspectives: "event strength, volume-price structure, positional relationship, and follow-through degree":

• Whether the event is new enough, strong enough, and specific enough
• Whether volume expansion matches a price breakout, rather than a late-session or instantaneous pulse
• Whether the current price position is prone to encountering trapped positions or profit-taking positions
• Whether the market provides sustained follow-through orders, rather than a single order lifting the price

Step 5: Provide response prompts

The focus of the output is not to directly conclude buy or sell, but to tell the user what should be prioritized for observation at this time:

• If the abnormal movement is credible, which confirmation signals should continue to be monitored
• If the quality of the abnormal movement is average, which pullback or rebound traps should be guarded against
• If the abnormal movement is highly doubtful, how to lower the priority of attention

Step 6: Integrate into an intraday quick-judgment card

The final output is a concise conclusion card, without expanding the internal investigation process. The language should be short, clear, and easy to read quickly during the trading session.

Output structure

---

{Stock name} intraday abnormal movement quick judgment ({HH:mm})

1. Abnormal movement overview

• Abnormal movement type: {sharp rise/sharp fall/spike and retreat/dip and rebound}
• Abnormal movement description：{what price and volume changes occurred within what period of time}
• Position：{key level, middle of range, near previous high, near previous low, etc.}

II. Possible drivers

• Explicit driver：{if any, state the core event; if none, write "no newly discovered explicit driver"}
• Sector resonance：{whether there is any, and how it is performing}
• Sentiment factors：{whether it belongs to theme fermentation, capital scrambling for shares, panic stampede, etc.}

III. Judgment of abnormal movement quality

Dimension	Judgment	Explanation
Event intensity	High/Medium/Low	{reason}
Price-volume match	High/Medium/Low	{reason}
Continuation probability	High/Medium/Low	{reason}
Pullback risk	High/Medium/Low	{reason}

IV. Key points for intraday response

• Priority confirmation signal：{what needs to be seen for continued strengthening}
• Invalidation signal：{if what appears, it indicates the abnormal movement is likely distorted}
• Current conclusion：{one-sentence summary of whether it is worth continued tracking}

---

Quality requirements

1. A quick judgment must prioritize answering "why did it move" and "can this wave be trusted," rather than repeating the intraday performance.
2. When no cause can be found, state it truthfully; do not package speculation as fact.
3. Judgments about sustainability must include evidence and must not merely say "it looks very strong."
4. The main text should be suitable for intraday reading and avoid long background introductions.
5. If the abnormal movement is caused by resonance across the entire sector, highlight whether "the individual stock is merely a mapping" or "the individual stock has an independent catalyst."