canslim_growth_scan_skill

CANSLIM Growth Scan Skill

Data dependencies and execution prerequisites

It is recommended to use Wind wind-mcp-skill to obtain underlying data. Before execution, first check whether there is already wind-mcp-skilllocally; if not, prompt the user to install:

# GitHub
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

# Gitee 镜像（国内）
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

Skill positioning

This skill is used to screen out, from a large number of stocks based on a growth stock selection framework, strong candidate stocks with "fundamental growth, strengthening market expectations, leading price performance, and favorable supply-demand structure." The output focus is not to mechanically label classic methodologies, but to integrate growth quality, earnings acceleration, relative strength, and market capital preference into a practical screening framework.

Function overview

The core function of this skill is: use a growth stock methodology to batch-screen strong candidates where fundamentals and price action resonate.

It emphasizes combining growth, expectations, strength, supply and demand, and market主线 in judgment, helping users form a growth stock candidate pool closer to the logic of "the strong stay strong."

Use cases

• Growth stock investors need to quickly identify, from a batch of stocks, the ones that best fit the strong growth profile.
• After earnings season or during a phase of strengthening prosperity, the growth candidate pool needs to be updated in batches.
• Users want to consider both fundamental growth and market strength, rather than looking at only a single dimension.
• Teams need to conduct structured screening within an industry for "who is strongest and why."

Working principles

1. Growth stock screening must consider both operating acceleration and market confirmation, and cannot look only at earnings growth rates.
2. Relative price strength is both an outcome and a screening condition, but it cannot be used separately from fundamentals.
3. Attention should be paid to supply-demand structure and free-float share characteristics, avoiding looking only at static financial indicators.
4. The methodology should serve actual screening and should not be written as terminology explanations.
5. The main text does not explicitly mention the internal invocation process.

Execution process

Step 1: Confirm the screening scope and definition of growth

First clarify whether this scan is more oriented toward:

• Leader screening within high-growth industries
• Cross-industry horizontal scanning for strong growth stocks
• Earnings growth stocks that have shown obvious acceleration in recent quarters
• Or prosperity growth stocks under strengthened themes

At the same time, confirm whether the user places more emphasis on profit growth, revenue growth, or a comprehensive profile of "growth + relative strength."

Step 2: First screen operating growth and direction of change

The first layer of growth stocks is whether the operating variables are improving. Key judgments:

• Whether revenue, profit, profit margin, or core business indicators are accelerating
• Whether growth comes from real demand expansion or one-time fluctuations
• Whether current growth is still improving, rather than having already peaked
• Whether the company has the foundation to support continued high prosperity for the next several quarters

Step 3: Combine market expectations and earnings verification

Whether a growth stock is worth tracking depends not only on the statements, but also on whether the market is willing to revise expectations upward. Judge:

• Whether recent earnings reports or business updates have continuously strengthened market expectations
• Whether management guidance and industry feedback support further upward revisions
• Whether the market previously underestimated the strength of growth
• If expectations are already very high, whether there is still enough room for further upward revisions

Step 4: Check relative strength and leadership attributes

Growth stock selection must also consider market confirmation. Focus on:

• Whether price performance is significantly stronger than the broad market, the industry, and peers
• Whether the strength is steady progress or a one-off spike after violent fluctuations
• Whether it has the attribute of leading capital focus within the sector
• Over the past period, whether pullbacks were short and strong and advances had more slope

Step 5: Evaluate supply-demand structure and trading characteristics

Many growth stocks fail to become strong not because the logic is bad, but because the supply-demand structure does not support it. Observe:

• Whether the free float, turnover, and chip structure support trend continuation
• Whether there is excessive crowding or clear pressure for profit-taking
• Whether the market's preference for this growth style is rising
• Whether it currently looks more like an “institutional slow bull” or a “thematic fast rise and fast fall”

Step 6: Identify real priority differences

Rank candidates comprehensively by “growth acceleration + expectation revision capability + relative strength + supply-demand structure,” distinguishing:

• Core strong growth stocks
• Suboptimal targets with good logic but still awaiting confirmation
• Watchlist targets with seemingly attractive financial growth but not yet confirmed by the market

Step 7: Add risks and failure modes

Growth stock screening must proactively consider failure modes, such as:

• High growth is unsustainable
• Valuation is overextended too quickly
• Market style shifts to defensive
• Deterioration in supply-demand structure causes the strong trend to break

Step 8: Integrate into a finished strong growth stock draft

The final output should let users know “who best fits the strong growth stock profile, why, who to keep following, and who to avoid.” The main text should present only conclusions, evidence, and the subsequent observation framework.

Output structure

---

Strong Growth Stock Screening ({YYYY-MM-DD})

I. 30-second conclusion

• Strongest growth candidates: {name list}
• Most core advantage dimension: {growth acceleration / expectation revision / relative strength / supply-demand advantage}
• Overall judgment: {active tracking / selective focus / cautious tiering}
• Main risks: {one sentence}

II. Candidate pool overview

Stock	Growth quality	Expectation revision space	Relative strength	Supply-demand structure	Priority
{Target 1}	{Strong/Medium/Weak}	{High/Medium/Low}	{Strong/Medium/Weak}	{Excellent/Medium/Weak}	{A/B/C}
{Target 2}	{Level}	{Level}	{Level}	{Level}	{Level}

III. Breakdown of key candidates

{Stock Name}

• Growth main line: {content}
• Why the market is willing to give a premium: {content}
• Strongest confirmation signal: {content}
• Variables still needing observation: {content}
• Failure mode: {content}

IV. Tracking checklist

• {Tracking point 1}
• {Tracking Point 2}
• {Tracking Point 3}

V. Risk Disclosure

• {Risk 1}
• {Risk 2}
• {Risk 3}

---

Quality Requirements

1. Both lines—operating growth and market confirmation—must be taken into account.
2. High growth rates cannot be directly equated with strong growth stocks.
3. It is necessary to explain whether the supply-demand structure and style environment support continuation.
4. A distinction must be made between core candidates and watchlist targets that have only a growth narrative.
5. The output should directly serve the management of the growth stock candidate pool.