Triggers & routing
- Trigger: evidence audit, missing evidence, unsupported claims, review evidence audit, evidence gaps.
- Use when:
paper-reviewIn the process, it is necessary to check the evidence chain of each claim, missing baselines, and weak points in evaluation one by one. - Skip if: missing claims input (for example, there is not yet
output/CLAIMS.md)。 - Network: none.
- Guardrail: only write "gaps/risks/next-step verification"; do not write arguments on behalf of the authors or introduce new claims.
Transforms a claim ledger into a gap report for paper-review.
Input
output/CLAIMS.md
Output
output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.mdoutput/EVIDENCE_AUDIT.jsonl(review-evidence-gap.v1)
Contract
Each gap block should include:
- claim reference
- what evidence is already present
- what is missing or weak
- minimal fix
- severity
Each JSONL record must retain claim_id and a stable gap_id so the final
review can cite the exact failure rather than paraphrasing an unlocated concern.
Script boundary
scripts/run.py should:
- iterate existing claims only
- classify the likely evidence risk
- write actionable, bounded gap items
It should not invent new claims or rewrite the manuscript.
Acceptance
- every claim has a corresponding evidence note or gap item
- minimal fixes are actionable and concrete
- structured records join back to every
claim_id
Non-goals
- manuscript rewriting
- novelty assessment
- recommendation writing