Graphql Client And Bff Integration
Use When
- UI needs flexible data fetching across services
- Multiple clients share similar aggregation needs
Workflow
- Define schema ownership and deprecation policy
- Implement BFF resolvers with timeout and batching controls
- Normalize errors for UI consumption
- Add persisted queries or complexity limits where needed
- Monitor resolver latency and failure hotspots
Required Checks
- Schema changes are backward compatible or versioned
- N+1 query risks are controlled
- Auth enforced in BFF and underlying services
- Client cache invalidation strategy documented
Decision Framework
- Use BFF to shield UI from microservice churn
- Limit query depth and cost to prevent abuse
- Prefer explicit operations over unbounded graph exploration
- Cache at BFF only when staleness tolerance is clear
Common Rationalizations And Rebuttals
- "GraphQL removes need for API design." -> Schema governance is still required.
- "Client can call services directly." -> Coupling and security boundaries weaken.
- "No query limits needed internally." -> Expensive queries will appear under load.
Evidence Pack
- Schema diff and compatibility note
- Load test for hot queries
- Auth negative tests at BFF boundary
- UI error-state screenshots or tests
Exit Criteria
- GraphQL layer is secure and performant
- UI teams have stable contracts