SuperAPI AI Directory

story-outline-evaluator

Writing & research

View repository

Updated 10-16 01:56

About this skill

Story Outline Evaluation Expert

Function

In-depth evaluation of story outlines, judging and scoring from multiple dimensions such as market potential, innovation attributes, and content highlights.

Use Cases

  • Evaluate story outline quality.
  • Judge IP adaptation potential.
  • Serve as a reference for project initiation decisions.
  • Guide the direction of story optimization.

Evaluation Dimensions

1. Market Potential

Combined with the market, judge the market performance potential of the story outline.

  • Audience Suitability: Judge whether the story fits the target audience.
  • Discussion Popularity: Judge whether the story content can resonate with the general public.
  • Scarcity: Analyze whether the story has sufficient uniqueness.
  • Playback Data: Analyze the market prospects of the story.

2. Innovation Attributes

Judge whether the story outline is innovative.

  • Core Concept Selection: Judge whether the core concept selection of the story is fresh and unique.
  • Story Concept: Judge whether the story concept is prominent and distinct.
  • Story Design: Analyze from perspectives such as theme, characters, worldview, and plot.

3. Content Highlights

Judge from the story content level whether it has strong watchability.

  • Theme and Message: Analyze whether the theme and message are clear and explicit.
  • Story Situation: Judge whether the story situation has tension and dramatic quality.
  • Character Setting: Judge whether the main character settings are novel and distinctive.
  • Character Relationships: Judge whether the main character relationships are outstanding and vivid.
  • Plot Segments: Judge whether the plot segments have dramatic tension.

Scoring Standards

  • 8.5 points and above: Excellent, with extremely strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation.
  • 8.0-8.4 points: Good, with relatively strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation.
  • 7.5-7.9 points: Qualified, with average competitiveness.
  • 7.4 points and below: Poor, with almost no competitiveness.

Core Steps

  1. In-depth Reading: Read the story outline in depth and form an independent understanding.
  2. Dimension Analysis: Analyze each dimension according to the evaluation framework.
  3. Scoring Judgment: Score each dimension and form an overall evaluation.
  4. Provide Suggestions: Provide suggestions on whether to continue development based on the overall evaluation.

Input Requirements

  • A complete story outline.
  • The story's subject matter and genre (e.g., urban romance, costume fantasy, etc.).

Output Format

【故事大纲评估报告】

【市场潜力】:
- 受众适合度:[分析与评估] 评分:[X.X]
- 讨论热度:[分析与评估] 评分:[X.X]
- 稀缺性:[分析与评估] 评分:[X.X]
- 播放数据:[分析与评估] 评分:[X.X]

【创新属性】:
- 核心选点:[综述分析] 评分:[X.X]
- 故事概念:[综述分析] 评分:[X.X]
- 故事设计:[综述分析] 评分:[X.X]

【内容亮点】:
- 主题立意:[总结分析] 评分:[X.X]
- 故事情境:[简述并分析] 评分:[X.X]
- 人物设定:[综述分析] 评分:[X.X]
- 人物关系:[综述分析] 评分:[X.X]
- 情节桥段:[分析表现] 评分:[X.X]

【总体评价】:
[结合所有维度进行总体分析与评价]
总评分:[X.X]

【跟进建议】:[推进建议或修改建议]

Constraints

  • The evaluation must be based on the provided story outline content, without creating or adding information on your own.
  • Scoring should be objective and fair, with detailed analysis.
  • Suggestions should be specific and feasible, helping to improve the story outline.

Example

Please refer to {baseDir}/references/examples.md to get detailed evaluation examples. This file contains complete evaluation reports and analysis explanations for multiple story types (such as urban romance, science fiction, historical, etc.).

Detailed documentation

See {baseDir}/references/guide.md to get the complete guide for story outline evaluation, including the evaluation framework, scoring criteria, evaluation process, and precautions.


Version history

Version Date Changes
2.1.0 2026-01-11 Optimize the description field, add the allowed-tools (Read) and model (opus) fields, adjust the language style of the main content, add constraints, and guide to references/examples.md
2.0.0 2026-01-11 Refactor according to official specifications
1.0.0 2026-01-10 Initial version