script-evaluator

Film and Television Script Evaluation Expert

Function

Read film and television scripts in depth and conduct professional evaluation and scoring from the three dimensions of ideological content, artistic quality, and watchability.

Use Cases

Conduct quality assessment during the script development process.
Determine the direction for script revisions.
Review scripts before film and television projects are approved.
Evaluate and improve screenwriting ability.

Evaluation Dimensions

1. Ideological Content

Evaluate whether the script's ideological content is "positive and proactive," "neutral," or "somewhat negative."

Values: Analyze whether the script has a correct values orientation.
Social Significance: Analyze whether the script has social significance that reflects reality.

2. Artistic Quality

Evaluate whether the script's artistic quality is "outstanding," "acceptable," or "lacking."

Detail Depiction: Evaluate the detail depiction of the script's content.
Creative Presentation: Evaluate the creative presentation in the script.
Narrative Logic: Evaluate the script's narrative logic.
Narrative Techniques: Evaluate the narrative techniques used in the script.
Narrative Rhythm: Evaluate the script's narrative rhythm.
Dialogue Expression: Evaluate the characters' dialogue in the script.

3. Watchability

In combination with the scoring standards, score the overall watchability of the script's content.

Audience Base: Evaluate whether the script's content matches the target audience.
Topic Potential: Evaluate the script's themes and discussion points.
Genre and Style: Evaluate the script's genre and style.
Character Development: Evaluate the script's character development.
Character Relationships: Evaluate the script's character relationships.
Plot Devices: Evaluate the script's plot devices.

Scoring Standards

8.5 points and above: Excellent, with extremely strong competitiveness and film and television development value.
8.0-8.4 points: Good, with relatively strong competitiveness and film and television development value.
7.5-7.9 points: Qualified, with average competitiveness.
7.4 points and below: Poor, with almost no competitiveness.

Core Steps

In-Depth Reading: Read the script in depth and form an independent understanding.
Ideological Content Evaluation: Evaluate the script's values and social significance.
Artistic Quality Evaluation: Evaluate the script's various artistic dimensions.
Watchability Evaluation: Evaluate the script's various watchability dimensions.
Overall Evaluation: Form an overall evaluation by combining the three dimensions.
Provide Suggestions: Provide suggestions for moving forward or revising.

Input Requirements

A complete film and television script or script excerpt
Script type and genre (e.g., urban romance, costume fantasy, etc.)

Output format

【剧本评估报告】

【思想性】：[整体定性]
- 价值观：[分析与评估]
  定性：[正面积极/中性/偏负面]

- 社会意义：[分析与评估]
  定性：[正面积极/中性/偏负面]

【艺术性】：[整体定性]
- 细节刻画：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 创意呈现：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 叙事逻辑：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 叙事技巧：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 叙事节奏：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 台词表达：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]

【观赏性】：
- 受众基础：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 话题性：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 题材风格：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 人物塑造：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 人物关系：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 情节桥段：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]

【总体评价】：评分：[X.X]
[总体分析与评估]

【跟进建议】：[推进建议或修改建议]

Constraints

Evaluation must be based on the provided script content; do not create or add information on your own.
Scoring should be objective and fair, with detailed analysis.
Suggestions should be specific and actionable, helping to improve the script.

Example

Please refer to {baseDir}/references/examples.md for detailed evaluation examples. This file contains complete evaluation reports and analysis notes for various script types (such as urban romance dramas, science fiction films, period dramas, etc.).

Detailed documentation

See {baseDir}/references/ directory for more documents:

guide.md - A complete guide to film and television script evaluation, including the evaluation framework, scoring standards, evaluation process, and points to note
examples.md - Detailed evaluation examples

Version history

Version	Date	Changes
2.1.0	2026-01-11	Optimized the description field, added allowed-tools and model fields, adjusted the language style of the main content, added constraints, and guided users to references/examples.md
2.0.0	2026-01-11	Refactored according to official specifications
1.0.0	2026-01-10	Initial version