SuperAPI AI Directory

ux-accessibility-audit

General & other

View repository

Updated 10-16 01:14

About this skill

Accessibility Audit Skill

How this skill behaves (read first)

This is an evaluative skill — it reviews existing work against a standard (WCAG), it doesn't generate UI. Flagging is safe, so it auto-runs and is designed to be called as a validation step by generative skills as well as invoked directly.

It owns the accessibility concern in this repo. Generative skills hand off to it (e.g. ux-login-signup, ux-pricing), and the heuristics audit (ux-heuristics-audit) deliberately defers contrast / keyboard / screen-reader specifics here rather than duplicating them. When invoked, do the full a11y pass; don't assume another skill covered it.

Scope discipline. When invoked directly (the user named this audit), review only this concern — don't pull in sibling audits. It runs alongside other lenses only when an orchestrator (ux-design-review) or a generative skill calls it under docs/orchestration-policy.md, where it sits in Tier B — offered (and narrowed to usage when a design system is in play). Explicit scope always wins.


What this skill changes vs. default behavior

By default, accessibility feedback tends to be partial and vague — a few obvious call-outs ("add alt text", "check contrast") with no standard, no severity, and no systematic sweep. This skill forces four things:

  1. Every finding cites the WCAG criterion and level it violates — not a vague suggestion.
  2. Every finding gets a severity based on how completely it blocks access — so the list is prioritized.
  3. Every finding has a concrete fix — the specific markup/design change.
  4. The audit is systematic — it sweeps all six categories below, so issues outside the obvious ones (focus order, heading hierarchy, table semantics, motion) actually get caught.

WCAG foundations

POUR principles — every audit item maps to one of these four:

  • Perceivable — content must be detectable via at least one sense (sight, hearing, etc.)
  • Operable — all interactions must work without a mouse (keyboard, switch, voice)
  • Understandable — content and UI must be clear and predictable
  • Robust — content must work across browsers, devices, and assistive technologies

Compliance levels:

  • Level A — bare minimum; missing these creates complete barriers (e.g. no alt text, no keyboard access).
  • Level AA — the legal standard most organizations must meet; the default target for every audit.
  • Level AAA — aspirational; apply selectively where it adds high value.

Default audit target: WCAG 2.1 Level AA.


Audit checklist

Work through every category — a partial sweep is the main way real issues get missed. Flag each violation with WCAG criterion, severity (see model below), and a fix.

1. Color & Contrast

Check Requirement Notes
Normal text vs background ≥ 4.5:1 (AA) / 7:1 (AAA) Applies to all text in UI: buttons, labels, cards, nav
Large text (≥ 18pt or ≥ 14pt bold) ≥ 3:1
Icons (informational or interactive) ≥ 3:1 Decorative icons exempt
Input borders vs surrounding background ≥ 3:1 Including focus indicators
Text over images ≥ 4.5:1 between text and the portion of image behind it Use semi-transparent overlay if needed
Selection states Same ratios as regular text
Disabled elements Exempt from contrast rules Must still be recognizable as inactive
Logo text Exempt But good practice to maintain contrast anyway
Color as sole differentiator ❌ Never Always pair color with icon, pattern, label, or text
Stark contrast (pure black on white) Discouraged Use #333 on #F8F8F8 — exceeds AA while reducing eye strain

Don't rely on color alone: error states need an icon + text, not just red. Charts need patterns or labels, not just color.


2. Typography & Text

Check Requirement
Base body font size ≥ 16px
Line length 45–75 characters (including spaces)
Text alignment Follows reading direction (LTR → left-align; RTL → right-align)
Headings visually distinct Larger size, bold weight, or color difference from body text
One <h1> per page Page title only
Heading hierarchy No skipped levels (h1 → h2 → h3, never h1 → h3)
Semantic heading tags Use <h1>–<h6>, not styled <div> or <p>
Language Plain language, secondary-education reading level
Idioms & figures of speech Avoid — confuse screen readers and non-native speakers
Typeface Clear letterform distinctions (0 vs O, 1 vs l vs I); large x-height

3. Forms

Check Requirement
Keyboard access Every field, dropdown, checkbox, radio, button navigable via Tab / Shift+Tab / Enter / arrows
Focus indicators Visible on every focused element — never remove browser default without replacing
Layout Single-column preferred; multi-column increases cognitive load and screen-reader confusion
Input boundaries Visible borders or backgrounds — never borderless inputs
Labels Outside the field, not placeholder-only; min 16px; 4.5:1 contrast
Placeholder text Supplemental only — disappears on input, so never the sole label
Autocomplete Implement for name, email, phone, address, payment (HTML autocomplete attribute)
Error states Multiple cues: icon + bold border + field-specific message. Never color alone
Error placement Adjacent to the offending field + aria-describedby linking field to error
Error summary At top of form on submit failure, with anchor links to each problem field
Authentication No text-based CAPTCHA — use magic links, OTP, passkeys, or biometrics. Support paste in password fields
Mobile one-handed use Center CTAs in lower-middle zone; avoid right-edge-only button placement

4. Links & Navigation

Check Requirement
Link labels Descriptive, specific — "Download pricing guide" not "Click here" or "Read more"
New-window links Warn users in link text or aria-label: "opens in new tab"
File links State type + size: "Annual Report (PDF, 2.5 MB)"
Raw URLs as link text ❌ Never — screen readers read character by character
Link recognizability Underline + color (not color alone)
Focus state Visible, distinctive focus ring on every link and interactive element
href attribute Required on all <a> tags — <div> with click handler is not a link
Voice/tone Link text should match the product's voice, but always prioritize clarity
Help links Consistently placed (footer, header utility nav, or persistent help icon)

5. Images & Multimedia

Check Requirement
Informational images alt attribute with meaningful description
Decorative images alt="" (null) — tells screen readers to skip
Images containing text Alt text = the exact text in the image
Autoplay ❌ Disabled by default — user must initiate playback
Media controls Play/pause/stop/rewind/volume/mute/captions — keyboard accessible, sufficient size and contrast
Video captions Required for all pre-recorded video with audio
Audio transcripts Required for all audio-only content
Flashing/strobing content ❌ No content flashing > 3 Hz or red flashing at any rate
Animations (GIF, SVG, CSS) No more than 5 light-dark stripe pairs; provide a way to pause/stop
Icons Pair with text labels; informational icons need aria-label or title
Swipe gestures Support both directions or provide an alternate tap target

6. Tables & Lists

Check Requirement
Data tables Use <table> element — never use tables for layout
Table caption <caption> immediately after <table> opening tag
Header cells <th> with scope="col" or scope="row" — never empty
Complex tables Avoid merged cells and multi-level headers; split into simpler tables if needed
Cell widths Use % not px — allows browser reflow; never set cell height manually
Lists Use <ul>, <ol>, or <dl> appropriately — not styled <div> rows
Unordered lists For items where order doesn't matter
Ordered lists For sequential steps, rankings, instructions
Description lists <dl> / <dt> / <dd> for glossaries, FAQs, key-value metadata

Severity rating

Rate each finding by how completely it blocks access and which WCAG level it fails:

Severity Meaning
Critical Blocks access entirely for some users. Usually a Level A failure — no keyboard access, no alt text on informational images, missing captions, a keyboard trap. Fix before ship.
Major Significant friction; users can sometimes work around it but shouldn't have to. Usually a Level AA failure — contrast below 4.5:1, placeholder-as-label, color-only error states, missing focus indicators.
Minor Noticeable but low-impact, or a best-practice / AAA improvement — slightly short line length, stark pure-black text, a non-ideal but functional label.

When in doubt, rate by the user impact (does it block a task or merely add friction?), not by how easy the fix is.


Audit output format

## Accessibility Audit — [Component / Screen Name]
Context: [platform · WCAG target (default AA) · design or code]

### Critical (blocks access entirely)
- [Issue]: [what's wrong] → [fix] — WCAG [X.X.X]

### Major (significant friction)
- [Issue]: [what's wrong] → [fix] — WCAG [X.X.X]

### Minor (best practice / AAA)
- [Issue]: [what's wrong] → [fix] — WCAG [X.X.X]

### Passed ✓
- [what's already working]

Always end with a one-line summary stating the overall WCAG AA compliance status and the top fixes that would get it there.


How to run a good audit

  1. Establish context. Platform (web/mobile/native), target level (AA by default — only go AAA if asked), and whether you're auditing a design or live code (some checks, like keyboard order and aria-*, only apply to code).
  2. Sweep all six categories. The value of this skill over a default review is completeness — don't stop at contrast and alt text.
  3. Rate by barrier, not by effort. A one-line alt fix can still be Critical.
  4. Be specific in fixes. Give the exact change (markup, attribute, ratio, or design adjustment), not "make it accessible."
  5. Note tooling limits. Automated scanners catch only ~30–40% of issues — manual review of focus order, alt-text quality, and reading order still matters.

Recommended tools

For automated scanning (catches ~30–40% of issues):

  • WAVE (browser extension) — overlays visual indicators, references violated WCAG criteria
  • axe DevTools (Chrome extension) — accurate, dev-friendly; powered by axe-core
  • Google Lighthouse (Chrome DevTools → Lighthouse tab) — accessibility + SEO + performance in one pass

For contrast checking in design:

  • Able (Figma plugin) — contrast checker + color-blindness simulator
  • Stark (Figma / Sketch / Adobe XD) — contrast, vision simulator, focus order, alt-text annotations
  • WCAG Color Contrast Checker (Chrome extension) — real-time ratio checking in browser

For screen-reader testing:

  • VoiceOver (macOS/iOS, built-in) — navigate with VO + arrow keys
  • NV Access / NVDA (Windows, free) — most widely used Windows screen reader

For seizure risk:

  • PEAT (downloadable) — analyzes video/animation for photosensitive epilepsy triggers
  • Harding Test — online paid service for broadcast/video content

Common do/don't patterns

❌ Don't ✅ Do
Use red text alone for errors Red border + warning icon + descriptive message
<a>Click here</a> <a>Download the onboarding guide (PDF, 1.2 MB)</a>
<img src="chart.png"> (no alt) <img src="chart.png" alt="Bar chart showing Q3 revenue by region">
Decorative image with alt text <img src="bg-swoosh.svg" alt="">
Pure black #000 on pure white #FFF Dark grey #333 on off-white #F8F8F8
Placeholder as the only label Persistent label above the field + optional placeholder
Jump from <h1> to <h3> Always use <h1> → <h2> → <h3> in order
Table for page layout CSS Grid or Flexbox for layout; <table> for data only
Autoplay video Controls visible at top; user initiates playback
Color-only chart legend Add patterns, shapes, or data labels alongside color
Report only the obvious issues Sweep all six categories; rate by barrier; cite the criterion

Source lessons (Uxcel)