A combinator-style meta-skill that runs three independent reviewers in parallel over the currently-uncommitted diff, then arbitrates a single verdict with a strict priority rule.
This is the same combinator + arbitrate pattern as
meta-security-review-bundle, applied to a code-review domain. The
three reviewers each carry a tight, project-specific rubric — safety
focuses on injection / credentials / G1.6 contract; tests focuses on
the "new public surface ⇒ corresponding test" expectation; style
flags only a fixed list of antipatterns so it doesn't drift into
free-form opinions.
Trigger surface
Fire by saying multi-reviewer diff, codereview my diff, or one of the
localized triggers listed in the frontmatter. The diff is read from the working
tree (git diff --cached HEAD, falling back to git diff HEAD if nothing is
staged).
Fallback
If read_diff returns NO_DIFF, the downstream reviewers should
reply with their respective clean verdicts ("CLEAR" / "PASS" /
"CLEAN") and arbitrate emits PASS_WITH_NOTES: clean. If a reviewer
LLM step fails, the orchestrator's partial outputs are visible in
step_outputs; operator should manually re-run the failed reviewer.