Announce at start: "Using pythia-write — mining the codebase's conventions first."
Phase: Learn → Do — mine the neighbours first, then draft; landing it is pythia-apply's job
Before anything: if the project has .pythia/conventions.md, read it —
house rules there outrank every generic pattern below, and
pythia conventions shows the naming patterns the apply preview will check. If the project has none and the developer
describes a house style, offer pythia conventions --init — captured once,
it applies to every future session instead of being re-explained.
A codebase with thousands of procedures has already decided how procedures look. Your job is to write one that a maintainer cannot tell from the existing ones — not to introduce a better style.
The Workflow
- Find the models.
pythia similar <NEW_NAME>ranks existing programs sharing name tokens; theMATCHED_TOKENScolumn says why. Open the top two or three withpythia srcand imitate: naming, parameter prefixes, cursor style, error handling, comment style. - Anchor the signatures. For every program you call:
pythia args NAME— real parameter names, order, types, defaults. Never guess a signature from memory of similar code. - Anchor the types. For every table you touch:
pythia cols TABLE— then declare variables with%TYPE/%ROWTYPEagainst those columns instead of copying the current type by hand. The declaration then survives column changes. - Write the file. Rules the write path enforces — follow them here:
- One object per file. Package spec and body are two files.
- End the file with the PL/SQL block's
;and a final line holding/. - Name the object unqualified, or qualified with the exact schema the connection targets — a mismatch is refused at apply time.
- Non-ASCII string literals (Vietnamese messages, any accented text):
never paste raw — run
pythia unistr "<text>"and use the printedunistr('...'), so the text survives every client/DB charset exactly. (COMMENT ON ... ISis the exception: it takes a literal only.)
- Check yourself before handing off.
pythia lint <file>first — the built-in standards plus the LEAD's rules; errors are fixed before the preview. Then reread againstreference/patterns.md— cursor and bulk patterns, exception discipline, bind variables, commit ownership. Every comment you wrote or touched goes throughpythia-comment.
Scope is the developer's sentence, not yours
Change ONLY the objects the developer named. When impact shows dependents that will break, you REPORT them with the list and a proposal — fixing them is a separate request that needs its own explicit approval. "While I was there" is how an asked-for table edit becomes seven unasked procedure rewrites.
Conventions outrank preferences
If the codebase writes explicit cursors where you would write FOR r IN,
write explicit cursors. If its parameter prefixes look dated, use them
anyway. A mixed-style codebase is worse than a consistently dated one —
propose style changes to the developer separately, never silently.
When NOT to use this skill
- A new package, API or trigger design →
pythia-packageshapes it first. - Tables, columns, comments →
pythia-table. - Understanding existing code →
pythia-explore. - Measuring what a change breaks →
pythia-impact(must already be done). - Landing the file on the database →
pythia-apply, always — neverrun-sql, neversqlplus.