Review Process
- Receive Topic(from topic-generator or user input)
- Check Item by Item: Score according to the review checklist
- Output Conclusion: Pass/Fail + Reason
Review Checklist
Must-Pass Items (Veto)
| Check Item | Fail Standard |
|---|---|
| Popularity | Discussion volume <100 or no growth trend |
| Relevance | Unrelated to AI/programming/productivity |
| Timeliness | Old news older than 72 hours |
| Writability | No actionable content output |
Scoring Items (100 points total)
| Dimension | Weight | Scoring Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Unique Angle | 30% | Whether there is an entry point no one else has written about |
| User Value | 25% | What readers can gain |
| Domestic Fit | 20% | Whether domestic users pay attention |
| Title Appeal | 15% | Whether people want to click in and read |
| Writing Difficulty | 10% | Whether it can be completed quickly and with high quality |
Passing line: 70 points
Common Reasons for Failing
-
Not popular enough
- Manifestation: Low discussion volume at the source, no spread trend
- Suggestion: Wait until it becomes popular before writing, or switch to a hot topic
-
No unique angle
- Manifestation: There are already a large number of similar articles
- Suggestion: Find a differentiated entry point, or give up
-
Does not match domestic users' attention
- Manifestation: Purely overseas event, no local connection
- Suggestion: Find a point of resonance for domestic users, or translate + localize
-
Pure hot-topic riding with no substance
- Manifestation: Only retelling the news, no incremental information
- Suggestion: Add hands-on practice/review/in-depth analysis
-
Writing cost too high
- Manifestation: Requires extensive research or has a high technical threshold
- Suggestion: Simplify the scope or split into a series
Output Format
## 选题审核结果
**选题**：[标题]
**结论**：✅ 通过 / ❌ 不通过
**评分**：XX/100
| 维度 | 得分 | 说明 |
|------|------|------|
| 独特角度 | /30 | |
| 用户价值 | /25 | |
| 国内适配 | /20 | |
| 标题吸引力 | /15 | |
| 写作难度 | /10 | |
**审核意见**
- 优点：...
- 问题：...
- 建议：...
**修改方向**（如不通过）
1. ...
2. ...
Quick Judgment
When there is no time for a detailed review, ask yourself:
- Will I regret not writing it today?
- What feedback can I get after writing it?
- Can I explain in one sentence why it is worth writing?
All 3 are "yes" = write it directly