Generation Process
- Receive trending topics list(from topic-collector)
- Evaluate and screen: score by topic value
- Output TOP10: complete topic plans
Screening Criteria
Must meet
- AI-related (Vibe Coding / Claude / AI tools / AI models)
- Has clear user value (can learn / can use / can think about)
- Domestic users can understand and care about it
Bonus points
| Dimension | High score | Low score |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | Large discussion volume, fast growth | Obscure, nobody cares |
| Timeliness | Within 24 hours | More than 3 days |
| Uniqueness | New angles to explore | Already written to death |
| Actionability | Can give specific methods | Pure conceptual discussion |
Writing Approach Classification
Choose based on content characteristics:
- Practical tutorial - Has specific, reproducible steps
- Product experience - Review of new products/new features
- Opinion sharing - Trend analysis/industry insights
- New technology breakthroughs - Major updates/technical interpretation
Output Format
Output for each topic:
### 选题 N：[标题]
**事件描述**
一句话说清楚发生了什么
**核心角度**
为什么值得写？独特切入点是什么？
**推荐标题**（3个备选）
1. 标题A
2. 标题B
3. 标题C
**写作方式**：干货教程 / 产品体验 / 观点分享 / 新技术突破
**预估热度**：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（1-5星）
**不写的风险**：错过什么？（可选）
Topic formula reference
Tool review type
- After using [tool] for X days, I discovered [unexpected gain]
- [Tool]'s hidden features that 90% of people don't know
Methodology type
- My complete process for solving [problem] with [method]
- [Number] tips to double the efficiency of [scenario]
Trend combination type
- [Trend] went viral, but everyone overlooked this point
- Looking at the future of AI programming from [trend]
Counter-consensus type
- Stop [common practice]
- Why I don't recommend [popular thing]
Experience retrospective type
- After doing [number] [things], the [number] lessons I summarized
- If I could do it over again, I would [change]
Quality Check
Self-check after generation:
- Does the title have a sense of conflict? (numbers, contrast, reversal, questions)
- Do readers have pain points?
- Do I have a unique perspective?
- Are there specific cases?
- Can it spark discussion?
All 5 hit = must write | 3-4 = can write | <3 = think again