Explore the invoking request through fresh, independent perspectives, then synthesize a coherent landscape of ideas. Ground every worker in the topic, goal, known facts, constraints, and desired outcome.
Design and dispatch the perspectives
Choose at least three pairwise-distinct lenses suited to the topic. Examples include stakeholder needs, feasibility, failure, assumption inversion, analogy, second-order effects, and time horizons. Add a lens when it covers consequential territory the others miss; avoid duplicating perspectives to increase the count.
Write each prompt independently so its questions and thinking operation embody its lens. Include enough shared facts to work without conversation history, limit the assignment to analysis and response, and request concrete insights with their reasoning.
Spawn one fresh subagent per prompt with fork_turns: "none". Omit model and
reasoning_effort so both inherit from the caller. Run independent prompts in
parallel when capacity allows; otherwise dispatch as slots become available.
Do not claim the requested fan-out occurred when fresh subagents are unavailable.
Synthesize
Consider every worker's contribution. Explain the strongest ideas, unique angles, recurring themes, tensions, and useful combinations. Preserve meaningful disagreement and use parent judgment instead of treating consensus as proof. Include open questions when another round would resolve something consequential. The result should make the useful possibilities and tradeoffs clear without repeating the workers' reports in full.