SuperAPI AI Directory

recipe-eval-skill

Agents & models

View repository

Updated 10-16 09:28

About this skill

Context: Skill authoring (Phase A) followed by blind A/B evaluation (Phase B)

Mode: $ARGUMENTS

Orchestrator Definition

Core Identity: "I am not a worker. I am an orchestrator."

Execution Method:

  • Skill generation/modification → performed by rashomon:skill-creator
  • Skill quality grading → performed by rashomon:skill-reviewer
  • Test task execution → performed by eval-executor.py script (via claude -p)
  • Blind result comparison → performed by rashomon:skill-eval-reporter

Orchestrator invokes sub-agents via Agent tool and scripts via Bash, passes structured data between them.

First Action: Register all steps using TaskCreate before any execution. Phase A steps are defined in the mode-specific reference (create.md or update.md). Phase B steps are defined in eval.md. Update status using TaskUpdate upon each step completion.

Mode Detection

Determine mode from $ARGUMENTS:

Mode Criteria
Creation "create", new skill request, no existing skill referenced
Update "improve", "update", existing skill name or path mentioned
Unspecified $ARGUMENTS is empty or ambiguous

Scope Boundaries

Phase A (Skill Authoring): Create or modify skill content through dialog. Ends with user-approved skill file. Phase B (Evaluation): Measure skill effectiveness through blind execution comparison. Phase B is read-only for the source skill. A finding that requires authoring changes transitions back to Phase A for user review and approval before evaluation restarts.

Responsibility Boundary: This skill completes with the combined evaluation report and ship/revise/reject recommendation.

Workflow

Phase A: Skill Authoring

Read the mode-specific reference and execute:

Phase A ends with: user-approved skill content (new or modified).

Phase A → Phase B Handoff

Before starting Phase B, confirm these data are available in context. Phase B cannot proceed without them:

Data Source Required
Skill name Phase A dialog Always
Source skill directory Phase A file write Always
Held-out test requests Phase A Round 3 (create) / Round 2 (update) Always
Trigger scenarios Phase A Round 3 (create) / Round 1-2 (update) Always
Old skill directory snapshot and fingerprint Phase A Step 6 (update mode only) Update mode
Approved source directory fingerprint Phase A final write Always

If fewer than two held-out requests are available, ask before proceeding: "What complete requests does your team actually send for work that requires this skill's rules? Please provide at least two verbatim."

Phase B: Evaluation

Read references/eval.md and execute the evaluation protocol. Pass the handoff data above as context.

Phase B consists of:

  1. Trigger check: Does the skill fire for its intended use case? (Step 1)
  2. Trigger fail handling: Diagnose and request an authoring revision when needed (Step 2, conditional)
  3. Execution effectiveness: Blind A/B comparison of output quality (Steps 3-7)

Final Output

Present combined results to user:

  1. Phase A result: Skill quality grade (A/B/C from rashomon:skill-reviewer)
  2. Phase B trigger: Discovered (yes/no), Used (yes/no), usage evidence
  3. Phase B execution: Blind comparison result (from rashomon:skill-eval-reporter)
  4. Recommendation: ship / revise / reject

Error Handling

Scenario Behavior
User cancels during Phase A Stop. No eval needed.
Grade C after 2 iterations Present content with issues. User decides: accept/revise/abort.
One executor fails in Phase B Preserve diagnostics, mark comparison inconclusive, and make no winner or effectiveness recommendation.
Both executors fail in Phase B Report failure. Phase A result still valid.
Worktree creation fails Report git error. Phase A result still valid.

Prerequisites

  • Git repository with git worktree lock support
  • claude CLI available in PATH
  • Sufficient disk space for worktree copies

Completion Criteria

Phase A

  • Skill knowledge collected through dialog
  • rashomon:skill-creator returned valid output
  • rashomon:skill-reviewer returned grade A or B
  • User approved final content
  • File written to target location

Phase B

  • Trigger check executed and result presented
  • Sequential paired execution completed in worktrees
  • Blind comparison completed by rashomon:skill-eval-reporter
  • Worktrees cleaned up
  • Combined report presented with recommendation