share

share

Take a finished report and produce platform-native content, ready to paste. Nothing generic: each platform gets its own format, length, and link etiquette.

Workflow

1. Locate the report. A file the user points at, the report from this conversation, or — if there is none — offer to run the bullshit-detector skill first.
2. Ask which platforms if not stated. Default set: X thread + LinkedIn post.
3. Write the posts following the per-platform specs in PLATFORMS.md exactly — hooks, length limits, link placement. Output each as a separate fenced block the user can copy verbatim.
4. Carousel (if requested or if the platform benefits): extract the report into a slides.json (schema below) and render:

uv run <this-skill-dir>/scripts/render_carousel.py slides.json -o carousel/

First run needs a one-time browser install: uv run --with playwright playwright install chromium. Output: slide-N.png (1080×1350, works on X, LinkedIn, Instagram) + carousel.pdf (LinkedIn document post).

slides.json schema

{
  "title": "Video/article title",
  "source": "Author · Platform · 1.16M views",
  "score": 5,
  "verdict_line": "Real tools, fantasy income math",
  "footer": "@their-handle · their-link (the sharer's, not the tool author's — see rules)",
  "slides": [
    { "type": "hook" },
    { "type": "claim", "n": "1/12", "claim": "Quoted or paraphrased claim, ≤200 chars",
      "verdict": "misleading", "evidence": "One-sentence reality, ≤160 chars" },
    { "type": "cta", "headline": "Run it on anything",
      "lines": ["the sharer's own links — ask, don't assume"] }
  ]
}

Verdicts: confirmed / plausible / misleading / false / unverifiable / not checked — the same six the report uses, and the renderer rejects anything else rather than guessing a colour. Pick 3–4 claim slides — the spiciest verdicts with the strongest evidence, not the first four. Hook and CTA slides bookend them.

A not checked claim renders, but think before using one: it carries no verdict and no evidence by definition, so it makes a weak slide and a reader may take the empty cell for a finding.

Rules

• The report is the content; the tool is the footnote. Hooks lead with findings ("12 claims, 3 misleading"), never with "I built a tool".
• Footer and CTA belong to the person sharing. Ask for their handle/newsletter/links (or omit those slides) — never default to the tool author's branding. Crediting the tool is welcome but optional: one line like "made with bullshit-detector" is plenty.
• Numbers must match the report exactly — a fact-checking brand cannot round its own stats.
• Stay honest in compression: if the report's verdict is nuanced ("competent hype, not a scam"), the post says that too. No rage-bait the report doesn't support.
• Never fabricate engagement bait ("everyone is talking about this").
• Each platform block must be paste-ready: correct length, line breaks, and links already positioned per PLATFORMS.md.