SuperAPI AI Directory

retro

Coding & development

View repository

Updated 11-11 18:37

About this skill

Retro

Propose improvements to the agent's environment based on where a session struggled. Propose only: change nothing until the user picks a candidate. Fix the environment, not the code the session produced (that is code-review).

Steps

  1. Create a task per step below, each with its completion criterion.
  2. Get the session record:
    • No session named: use the current conversation.
    • Session named, or the current one is too long to recall reliably: run python3 scripts/session_digest.py <id-or-path> (--list N --project <repo> to find it). Digest each subagent transcript it lists when the struggle happened there.
  3. Mark the struggle moments: errors, retries, hook blocks, long searches, oversized results, compactions, user corrections, wrong turns. Cite each by digest call number (#12) or by quoting the user.
  4. Read the repo's existing checks (Makefile, package.json scripts, pre-commit config, CI workflows, .claude/settings.json hooks). A check that exists but is unwired or broken is the finding, in place of a new one.
  5. Map each struggle moment to a candidate using the categories below. Drop any candidate you can't trace to a struggle moment.
  6. Present candidates ranked by severity: cost of the struggle times how often it will recur. Each candidate states the moment, the fix, and the file it lands in.

Categories

  • Navigation: the agent took long to find a file or fact. Fix: a pointer from a file it already reads.
  • Automated checks: the agent made a mistake a tool could catch. Fix: lint rule, type, test, pre-commit hook, CI job, or a Claude Code PreToolUse/PostToolUse hook. A repo with no guardrail (no pre-commit hook and no CI running lint/typecheck/test) is a finding in itself.
  • Coding standards: the reviewer missed a mistake. Classify it first. Mechanical (banned API, import shape, file location, fixed syntax) gets a deterministic check. Judgement call (cross-file consistency, matching surrounding style) goes in the repo's standards doc (CODING_STANDARDS.md or CONTRIBUTING.md). code-review reads only what the repo documents, so a new standards doc also needs a one-line pointer from the project CLAUDE.md.
  • Steering bloat: global ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, project CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, .claude/rules/, auto-memory MEMORY.md, SessionStart hook context, or model-invoked skill descriptions are large. Fix: move instructions into checks or standards, path-scope them into rules, or tighten a skill description or make it user-invoked.
  • No-ops: steering lines the agent already obeys by default, or ignored anyway. Fix: delete, or replace with a check. Treat each as a candidate for the deletion test, judged on one session.
  • Skills: a skill failed to fire, fired wrongly, or its instructions misled the agent. Fix: its description or body.
  • Tool economy: a tool call was expensive for what it returned (see oversized results in the digest), or the agent repeated a call. Fix: a cheaper command, a script, or a narrower tool.
  • Information access: the agent lacked information it needed. Fix: tee dev server logs to a file, read-only access to a service, a docs pointer.
  • Sandbox and permissions: a sandbox or hook block cost retries. Fix: the command pattern the agent should have used, or a sandbox/permission rule change for the user to make.

Placement

The implementer has the most context pressure: it explores, writes code and debugs. The reviewer gets a diff. Put rules where there is room to apply them.

  • Steering files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SessionStart hooks) load into every session. Reserve them for navigation pointers and rules that apply to every task.
  • A recurring mistake becomes a failing check before it becomes prose.
  • Judgement rules go to the reviewer's standards doc, not CLAUDE.md. Extend an existing doc before writing a new one.
  • A user preference correction belongs in auto-memory as a feedback memory. Repo facts belong in the repo.

Applying a picked candidate

Load the matching skill before editing:

  • CLAUDE.md or .claude/rules/ -> authoring-claude-md
  • A skill -> skill-creator-primer
  • Hooks, permissions or settings -> update-config

Run a proposed check against the repo before letting it block anything.