SuperAPI AI Directory

proposal-writer

Design & creation

View repository

Updated 10-16 07:58

About this skill

Proposal Writer — proposal writing Full pipeline

proposal clientanalysis→solutiondesign→price→differentiation→specialistperson An agent team collaborates to generate all deliverables at once.

execution mode

agent team — 5 agents communicate directly via SendMessage and cross-verify each other's work.

agent composition

agent file role type
client-analyst .claude/agents/client-analyst.md client , decision-makingstructure, competitionsituation general-purpose
solution-architect .claude/agents/solution-architect.md solution composition, implementation plan, WBS general-purpose
pricing-strategist .claude/agents/pricing-strategist.md KRW, price model, ROI general-purpose
differentiator .claude/agents/differentiator.md USP, competitionadvantage, Win Theme general-purpose
proposal-designer .claude/agents/proposal-designer.md integration composition, specialistperson, cross-verification general-purpose

workflow

Phase 1: preparation (Orchestrator directly perform)

  1. Extract from user input:
  • client: clientcompanypeople, , scale
  • proposal target: /service/project
  • RFP (optional): RFP/RFI document
  • competition situation (optional): competitor
  • existing material (optional): before proposal, company itemsfrom, results material
  1. _workspace/ Create the directory at the project root
  2. Organize input and save to _workspace/00_input.md
  3. If existing files are provided, copy them to _workspace/and skip the corresponding Phase
  4. Determine the execution mode based on the scope of the request

Phase 2: team composition and execution

order task responsible dependency deliverable
1 client analysis analyst None _workspace/01_client_analysis.md
2a solution design architect task 1 _workspace/02_solution_design.md
2b differentiation strategy differentiator task 1 _workspace/04_differentiation.md
3 price strategy strategist task 1, 2a _workspace/03_pricing_model.md
4 proposal integration and verify designer task 2a, 2b, 3 _workspace/05_final_proposal.md

task 2a(solution) and 2b(differentiation) ** execution**. task 1(clientanalysis) only dependency.

teamKRW between flow:

  • analyst complete → architectto requirements+technicalenvironment deliver, differentiatorto competitionanalysis+company deliver, strategistto budget+priceinformation deliver
  • architect complete → strategistto KRW element deliver, differentiatorto technical gapbypoint deliver
  • differentiator complete → strategistto value message deliver
  • strategist complete → designerto price strategyfrom deliver
  • designer all deliverable cross-verification. 🔴 required revision findings when Request revision from the relevant agent -> rework -> re-verify (up to 2 rounds)

Phase 3: integration and final deliverable

  1. _workspace/ Verify all files in the directory
  2. verify reportConfirm that all critical revisions from the review report have been addressed
  3. Report the final summary to the user:
  • client analysis — 01_client_analysis.md
  • solution design — 02_solution_design.md
  • price strategy — 03_pricing_model.md
  • differentiation strategy — 04_differentiation.md
  • final proposal — 05_final_proposal.md

task scaleby mode

user request pattern execution mode deploy agent
"proposal create it", "RFP response" Full pipeline 5people beforeKRW
" RFP solution designplease do" solution mode analyst + architect + designer
"price only " (solution provide) price mode strategist + designer
" proposal differentiation point reportplease do" differentiation mode differentiator + designer
" proposal reviewplease do" review mode designer

existing file utilization: user RFP, existing proposal, company itemsfrom provide applicable content reflected.

data deliver protocol

strategy method also
File-based _workspace/ Store and share major deliverables
Message-based SendMessage Real-time key information transfer, revision requests

File naming convention: {}_{agent}_{deliverable}.{extensionspecialist}

error handling

error type strategy
client information insufficient /scalefrom file , userto core information question
RFP None user inputfrom requirements , proposal structure applied
specialistcompany information None userto strength/results question, minimum information differentiation composition
web search failure user provide material based task, "external data un-secure" specify
agent failure Retry once -> proceed without that deliverable
verifyfrom 🔴 findings Request revision from the relevant agent -> rework -> re-verify (up to 2 rounds)

test scenario

flow

Prompt: "Acompany ERP whensystem proposal create it. duringbasis sales 50000M scale. competitor SAP ." expected result:

  • client analysis: Acompany , Pain Point, decision-making structure, SAP/ competition analysis
  • solution: ERP , composition, implementation schedule, WBS
  • price: KRW analysis, 3degree price option, ROI(investment number duration)
  • differentiation: Win Theme 3items, SAP/ versus advantage matrix
  • proposal: integration proposal + specialistperson guide + consistency matrix confirm

RFP based flow

Prompt: " RFP proposal create it" + RFP file provide expected result:

  • RFP requirements itemby minute → responsetable writing
  • all requirements regarding solution mapping
  • RFP assessment standard proposal structure

error flow

Prompt: "proposal create it" expected result:

  • client/proposal target people → userto confirm question
  • answer basedas task progress
  • verify report "client information estimation based — confirm after revision needed" specify

agentby extension skill

extension skill target agent role
roi-calculator .claude/skills/roi-calculator/skill.md pricing-strategist, solution-architect ROI/TCO/NPV/IRR calculation, scenario analysis
win-theme-builder .claude/skills/win-theme-builder/skill.md differentiator, client-analyst Win Theme building, competition positioning, Ghost strategy