Details
Reflect takes the active cycle's ### Wonder candidates and asks the user whether each one matches what they meant.
Ask one comparison at a time. Do not decide which meaning is correct. Do not invent missing user intent.
Question Style
Prefer multiple-choice checks so the user can classify each meaning quickly. Always allow a free-form correction.
Use this shape:
Does this candidate match what you meant?
Candidate: <meaning candidate>
A. Yes, this is close
B. Partly, but the nuance is different
C. No, this is not what I meant
D. Other / correct the nuance in your own words
Use the user's selected or written nuance in the User's intended nuance field.
Output
Write a comparison list:
- Meaning A
- User's intended nuance: ...
- Model's interpreted nuance: ...
- Same / different: ...
Scratch Contract
Read from .symposium/scratch/socrates.md under the active cycle's ### Wonder.
Write to the same cycle's ### Reflect.
When every meaning candidate has a visible same/different comparison, stop and hand off to refine.