SuperAPI AI Directory

design-review

Design & creation

View repository

Updated 10-16 09:51

About this skill

Design Review

Conduct a design review of UI code and return a prioritised critique. The reviewer's lens is Emil Kowalski's design-engineering philosophy — taste is the differentiator; the unseen details compound; show the eye where to look — made concrete with the heuristics from Refactoring UI, WCAG, and MDN.

This is a read-only review skill: it diagnoses and proposes fixes; it does not rewrite the codebase. Each finding names the wrong default the code fell into, the exact fix, and why it matters.

When to Apply

  • The user asks to "review this UI", run a "design review", or "critique" a component, screen, or page.
  • The user says the output "looks off", "looks AI-generated", "looks like a wireframe", or "feels generic", and wants to know why.
  • A PR touches CSS/JSX/Tailwind and the user wants design feedback before merge.
  • The user wants to raise the visual polish or accessibility of an existing interface.

Not for building UI from scratch (use web-taste) or for the exhaustive animation rule set (use emilkowal-animations).

How to Run the Review

Two modes. A static review reads the code and is the default. A runtime review additionally drives a real browser to measure what the code can't show — animation timing and dropped frames, layout shift, the live focus order and accessibility tree, and the multi-page flow clicked through end to end. Switch to runtime whenever the verdict turns on rendered behaviour (the motion-, interact-, and flow- categories), per runtime-capture.md.

  1. Orient — the 0.5-second test. Before reading line by line, picture the rendered screen. Where does the eye land first? Is there a single focal point, or does everything carry equal weight? This frames which categories matter most for this UI.
  2. Pass the categories in priority order (table below). For each decision the code makes, read the matching reference file and check the code against it. Visual hierarchy and spacing are where the largest, most frequent problems live — start there.
  3. For multi-page or interaction-driven UX, walk it in a browser. When the brief is a flow ("review this onboarding") or the issue is felt in motion (jank, blank route flashes, lost focus), capture runtime evidence per runtime-capture.md so the Before column is a measured value, not a guess.
  4. Record each problem as a finding with a Before (the exact code or measurement), an After (the concrete fix), a Why (the principle), and a context-assigned Severity.
  5. Close with a verdict: the top 3 fixes, ranked by impact, so the author knows what to change first.

Output Format (Required)

Report findings as a single markdown table, one row per issue. Do not write findings as prose or as Before: / After: on separate lines.

Severity Before After Why
High transition: all 300ms ease-in transition: opacity 180ms cubic-bezier(0.23, 1, 0.32, 1) ease-in feels sluggish on entry; name the property and use a strong ease-out curve
High every button bg-indigo-600 one filled primary; others ghost/outline Equal-weight buttons compete; one primary makes the next step obvious
Medium color: #000 on #fff color: hsl(222 47% 11%) Pure black is harsher than ink and reads as stark
Critical <div onClick={remove}> <button type="button" onClick={remove}> A div is unreachable by keyboard and invisible to screen readers

Wrong format — never do this:

Before: transition: all 300ms
After: transition: opacity 180ms ease-out
────────────────────────────
Before: color #000
After: color slate-900

Severity guide (assigned per finding, by impact in this UI):

Severity Meaning
Critical Breaks usability or accessibility — fails contrast, no keyboard access, unreadable text
High Clearly damages the design — no hierarchy, cramped spacing, competing primary actions
Medium Noticeable polish gap — default easing, uniform line-height, missing press feedback
Low Minor refinement — a value slightly off the scale

Finish with: Top 3 fixes — the highest-impact rows, in the order the author should tackle them.

Rule Categories

# Category Prefix Covers
1 Visual Hierarchy hier- Focal point, emphasis technique, one primary action, value-over-label, space over borders
2 Spacing & Layout space- Spacing scale, generous whitespace, proximity grouping, constrained width
3 Typography type- Type scale, line length, line-height, alignment, readable body text
4 Colour & Contrast color- Near-black text, WCAG contrast, HSL ramps, restrained accents, colour-plus-cue
5 Component States & Feedback state- Press feedback, focus-visible, the full state matrix, empty states
6 Motion & Animation motion- Purpose/frequency, ease-out curves, sub-300ms, enter origin/scale, transform-only
7 Responsiveness & Touch resp- Fluid mobile-first, 44px targets, gating hover
8 Accessibility & Semantics access- Semantic elements, accessible names, reduced-motion
9 Flow & Navigation flow- App-shell consistency, view-state persistence, entry-point integrity, wayfinding
10 Interaction Continuity interact- Bridging route transitions, async feedback, focus on navigation

Quick Reference

1. Visual Hierarchy (hier-)

2. Spacing & Layout (space-)

3. Typography (type-)

4. Colour & Contrast (color-)

5. Component States & Feedback (state-)

6. Motion & Animation (motion-)

For drag, gestures, springs, stagger, clip-path, and the full timing/easing tables, defer to the emilkowal-animations skill.

7. Responsiveness & Touch (resp-)

8. Accessibility & Semantics (access-)

9. Flow & Navigation (flow-)

Reviews the experience across pages, which single-screen review can't see. Walk the flow in a browser (runtime-capture.md).

10. Interaction Continuity (interact-)

Reviews whether the experience stays continuous over time and across transitions — the dimension a screenshot can't show. Best judged against a captured trace (runtime-capture.md).

How to Use

Read a reference file when its decision comes up in the code under review. Each rule names the wrong default it corrects, then shows the canonical fix (with an Incorrect/Correct contrast only where the wrong way is a real trap). Cite the rule slug in the "Why" column so the author can follow up.

  • Runtime capture — drive a real browser (chrome-devtools-mcp) to measure motion, jank, focus order, and multi-page flow when a static read isn't enough
  • Section definitions — category structure and order
  • Rule template — for adding new rules
  • AGENTS.md — auto-built table of contents across all rules

Related Skills

  • emilkowal-animations — the exhaustive animation rule set (easing, gestures, springs, stagger); this skill defers motion depth to it.
  • web-taste — building React/Next/Tailwind UI with taste from the ground up (the build counterpart to this review).
  • tailwind-ui-refactor — applying these fixes as Tailwind refactors.
  • ui-design — broader build-time frontend reference (Core Web Vitals, forms, dark mode). Where the two overlap (semantics, contrast, focus, single primary action), reach for ui-design while authoring and design-review while reviewing.

Reference Files

File Description
references/_runtime-capture.md Browser-driven capture playbook (chrome-devtools-mcp via mcporter)
references/_sections.md Category definitions and ordering
assets/templates/_template.md Template for new rules
metadata.json Version and source references