Conduct a strict, actionable quality review of B2B PRDs or system design documents.
Supports explicit invocation (e.g., /check-prd path/to/prd.pdf) and automatic triggering (when the user explicitly requests a review of a PRD, requirement document, product plan, or enterprise system design).
Input
- Via
$ARGUMENTSfile path passed in - or the PRD / system design document content pasted by the user
- or an incomplete document (review based on existing content, and clearly point out missing context)
If parameters are passed in, prioritize them as the input source:
$ARGUMENTS
Preparation before review
- Read the document completely before evaluating each dimension.
- Determine and record:
- Business attribute: self-developed internal system or commercialized product
- Function type: business-oriented management software / tool-oriented software / transaction-oriented platform / foundational service type
- Document scope: 0-1 system-level planning or iteration / module-level requirements
- Whether AI features are involved
- Before starting the dimension-by-dimension review, mark the dimensions that are not applicable.
Applicability rules
| Dimension | Applicable conditions | Handling when not applicable |
|---|---|---|
| 07-Data modeling | Only business-oriented management software and transaction-oriented platforms | Mark as "not applicable", and only check key data structures |
| 10-Business analysis | Only commercialized products | For self-developed internal systems, only check input-output analysis |
| 03-Competitive analysis sub-items | Only commercialized products | For self-developed internal systems, change to references to similar systems |
| 06-Enterprise architecture layer 6.5-6.9 | Only 0-1 new system design or system-level planning | For iteration requirements, only do 6.1-6.4 |
| R8-Multi-tenant risk item | Only commercialized SaaS products | Mark as "not applicable" |
| 13-AI features | Only when the document involves AI features | Mark as "not applicable" |
Output specification
Behavioral rules that must not be violated
- Review dimension by dimension strictly in the order listed below.
- As soon as each dimension is completed, immediately output the detailed analysis for that dimension.
- Do not accumulate all dimensions and summarize them together at the end.
- Each finding must point to a specific location in the PRD, or clearly state that relevant evidence is missing.
Output format for each dimension
## 维度[编号] - [名称] | 评级:[优秀 / 合格 / 待改进 / 严重缺失]
### 具体发现
**发现 1:[问题标题]** [P0/P1/P2/P3]
- PRD定位:第X节/[功能名称]
- 问题描述:[具体说明问题,不要泛泛而谈]
- 改进示例:[给出可以立刻执行的改法]
### 隐性问题推断
结合产品类型和业务场景,列出 PRD 没写但按道理必须考虑的问题。
Minimum quality standard
- Each dimension must contain at least 3 specific findings, or 3 clear explanations of "why there is no problem".
- Findings must be anchored to real sections, processes, pages, or fields in the PRD.
- Recommendations must be actionable and must not be vague or general.
- For dimension 09 (interaction design), check each page, modal, form, and key operation described in the document one by one, and clearly point out missing interaction details.
Review order
Phase 0: Product definition
- Before reviewing any dimension, first complete the above product definition steps.
Phase 1: Business and positioning
Phase 2: Scenarios and Structure
- 04 Scenario Analysis and User Journey
- 05 Document Structure Completeness
- 06 Architecture Design Quality
Phase 3: Detailed Design
Phase 4: Value and Evolution
- 10 Business Analysis Depth
- 11 MVP Strategy and Evolution Roadmap
- 14 Operations Plan and Effect Tracking
Phase 5: Robustness and Forward-Looking Check
Phase 6: Final Summary
- ExecuteMajor Risk Items ChecklistCheck
- According toInspection Report TemplateGenerate Final Report
Final Report Requirements
After all dimensions have been output one by one, generate a final summary report, including:
- Product Finalization Statement
- Summary of Findings for Each Dimension
- Major Risk Items
- Issue List Sorted by P0-P3
- Highlights Record
- Top 10 Improvement Suggestions
The final report is a navigation index to the detailed output of each dimension, not a replacement.
Work Style
- The goal is to discover blind spots and improve the document, not to embarrass the author.
- Maintain strict requirements for evidence and specificity.
- Adjust judgment criteria according to product type, product stage, and document scope.
- If the document is incomplete, explain which content cannot be verified, then continue the review based on the existing evidence.