Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:
- Ticket tracker — where tickets live (GitHub by default; local markdown is also supported out of the box)
- Triage labels — the strings used for the five canonical triage roles
- Domain docs — where
CONTEXT.mdand ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading them - Review prep — the repo's commit style and breadcrumb convention, consumed by
tdd(writer) andprepare-for-review(reader)
This is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.
Process
1. Explore
Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:
git remote -vand.git/config— is this a GitHub repo? Which one?AGENTS.mdandCLAUDE.mdat the repo root — does either exist? Is there already an## Agent skillssection in either?CONTEXT.mdandCONTEXT-MAP.mdat the repo rootdocs/adr/and anysrc/*/docs/adr/directoriesdocs/agents/— does this skill's prior output already exist?.scratch/— sign that a local-markdown ticket tracker convention is already in use
2. Present findings and ask
Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then walk the user through the four decisions one at a time — present a section, get the user's answer, then move to the next. Don't dump them all at once.
Assume the user does not know what these terms mean. Each section starts with a short explainer (what it is, why these skills need it, what changes if they pick differently). Then show the choices and the default.
Section A — Ticket tracker.
Explainer: The "ticket tracker" is where tickets live for this repo. Skills like
to-ticketsandto-specread from and write to it — they need to know whether to callgh issue create, write a markdown file under.scratch/, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.
Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a git remote points at GitHub, propose that. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:
- GitHub — tickets live in the repo's GitHub Issues (uses the
ghCLI) - Local markdown — tickets live as files under
.scratch/<feature>/in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote) - Other (Jira, Linear, etc.) — ask the user to describe the workflow in one paragraph; the skill will record it as freeform prose
Section B — Triage label vocabulary.
Explainer: Tickets move through a state machine — needs evaluation, waiting on reporter, ready for an AFK agent to pick up, ready for a human, or won't fix. To do that, skills need to apply labels (or the equivalent in your ticket tracker) that match strings you've actually configured. If your repo already uses different label names (e.g.
bug:triageinstead ofneeds-triage), map them here so the skills apply the right ones instead of creating duplicates.
The five canonical roles:
needs-triage— maintainer needs to evaluateneeds-info— waiting on reporterready-for-agent— fully specified, AFK-ready (an agent can pick it up with no human context)ready-for-human— needs human implementationwontfix— will not be actioned
Default: each role's string equals its name. Ask the user if they want to override any. If their ticket tracker has no existing labels, the defaults are fine.
Section C — Domain docs.
Explainer: Some skills (
improve-codebase-architecture,tdd) read aCONTEXT.mdfile to learn the project's domain language, anddocs/adr/for past architectural decisions. They need to know whether the repo has one global context or multiple (e.g. a monorepo with separate frontend/backend contexts) so they look in the right place.
Confirm the layout:
- Single-context — one
CONTEXT.md+docs/adr/at the repo root. Most repos are this. - Multi-context —
CONTEXT-MAP.mdat the root pointing to per-contextCONTEXT.mdfiles (typically a monorepo).
Section D — Review prep.
Explainer: The implementation skills (
tddand successors) follow two project conventions: a commit style (so reviewers can read commits one at a time) and a breadcrumb convention (the agent writes short decision notes to.scratch/<feature>/decisions.mdas it works).prepare-for-reviewlater turns those notes into PR-body bullets and inline review comments — so reviewers see real rationale captured at the moment of choice, not reconstructed afterwards.
Bundled as one section because the two settings are always adopted together. Skim the seed templates with the user; let them edit before writing:
docs/agents/commit-style.md— one logical change per commit.docs/agents/decisions-breadcrumb.md— breadcrumb schema with examples.
3. Confirm and edit
Show the user a draft of:
- The
## Agent skillsblock to add to whichever ofCLAUDE.md/AGENTS.mdis being edited (see step 4 for selection rules) - The contents of
docs/agents/ticket-tracker.md,docs/agents/triage-labels.md,docs/agents/domain.md,docs/agents/commit-style.md,docs/agents/decisions-breadcrumb.md
Let them edit before writing.
4. Write
Pick the file to edit:
- If
CLAUDE.mdexists, edit it. - Else if
AGENTS.mdexists, edit it. - If neither exists, ask the user which one to create — don't pick for them.
Never create AGENTS.md when CLAUDE.md already exists (or vice versa) — always edit the one that's already there.
If an ## Agent skills block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.
The block:
## Agent skills
### Ticket tracker
[one-line summary of where tickets are tracked]. See `docs/agents/ticket-tracker.md`.
### Triage labels
[one-line summary of the label vocabulary]. See `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`.
### Domain docs
[one-line summary of layout — "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.
### Review prep
Commit style and breadcrumb convention for review-ready PRs. See `docs/agents/commit-style.md` and `docs/agents/decisions-breadcrumb.md`.
Then write the docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:
- ticket-tracker-github.md — GitHub ticket tracker
- ticket-tracker-local.md — local-markdown ticket tracker
- triage-labels.md — label mapping
- domain.md — domain doc consumer rules + layout
- commit-style.md — house commit style for review-by-commit
- decisions-breadcrumb.md — breadcrumb schema + examples
For "other" ticket trackers, write docs/agents/ticket-tracker.md from scratch using the user's description.
5. Done
Tell the user the setup is complete and which engineering skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit docs/agents/*.md directly later — re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch ticket trackers or restart from scratch.