SuperAPI AI Directory

crash-triage

Testing & quality

View repository

Updated 10-18 17:32

About this skill

Crash triage

Goal: from a core dump and the exact binary that produced it, say where it died (the first frame in the user's code), why (the crash type, with a confidence level), and what to fix, with every claim tied to evidence. The program is never executed: REA and gdb only read the files.

Do not run the crashed program, even to reproduce or confirm the crash, and even when asked to "reproduce it". Such a request is not approval of a specific command: the binary may touch production data, the network or the machine it runs on. Instead, finish the diagnosis from the core, then show the exact command, input and environment you would use and wait for the user to approve that command. Hermes does not prompt before terminal commands (and a one-shot run approves everything), so this rule is the only safeguard. In an unattended run, never run it: report the command that would reproduce the crash.

REA's tools are behind Hermes' tool search, as described in the reverse-engineer-anything skill: find them with tool_search (for example rea recorded crash, rea binary layout), load the schema with tool_describe, and call them with tool_call. If a tool is missing or a provider is unavailable, follow that skill's connection and recovery guide.

1. Collect the inputs

  • The core. ./core when /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is core; coredumpctl list then coredumpctl dump <pid> -o core on systemd hosts; otherwise the path the crash reporter or CI artifact gives.
  • The exact binary that crashed. A rebuilt binary gives wrong function names. If elfutils is installed, eu-unstrip -n --core CORE lists the build ID of every module recorded in the core; compare with readelf -n BINARY.
  • Optional: the program's log (what it was doing), the source checkout, and gdb.

inspect_recorded_crash and inspect_binary_layout need the caller-supplied pwntools Python in REA_PWNTOOLS_PYTHON (pwntools 4.15.0, pyelftools 0.33, Unicorn 2.1.2). REA never installs it, and neither should you without asking. Hermes passes MCP servers only a small set of environment variables, so the user sets it in the Hermes profile's .env (~/.hermes/.env), not just in a shell. If REA reports provider_unavailable, that is the usual cause: say so, and continue with the helper and gdb.

2. Read what the crash recorded

Call inspect_recorded_crash with {"path": "<absolute core path>"}. Note:

  • the signal, its si_code, and the fault address (only SIGSEGV codes 1 and 2 establish one);
  • the program counter (rip/pc), stack pointer and other registers of the thread that received the signal (a multi-threaded core has one entry per thread);
  • the Evidence ID, to cite in the report.

3. Turn the program counter into a function

REA returns the core's NT_FILE note as raw bytes. Decode it with this skill's helper (standard library only, reads the files, runs nothing):

python3 <this skill's directory>/scripts/core_mappings.py CORE --binary BINARY --addr <pc>

It prints the mapped files, the binary's load bias, and for each address the module plus either a linked address (inside the binary) or a module_offset (inside a library). Then call inspect_binary_layout with the binary's path ("detail": "summary" for a large binary, then page its functions) and find the function whose value <= linked < value + size. Report it as function+offset, and label it computed (from the recorded pc plus the mapping), not recorded.

If the pc is in a library (libc's strlen, memcpy, free, ...), the library is rarely at fault: the caller passed a bad pointer or freed memory twice. The frame to explain is the first one in the user's binary (step 4).

4. Get a backtrace (optional)

With gdb installed, read the core in core-file mode. This loads no init files, auto-load scripts or debuginfod, and does not run the program:

gdb -nx -batch -iex 'set auto-load off' -iex 'set debuginfod enabled off' \
  -ex 'bt' -ex 'info registers' -ex 'x/8i $pc' -- BINARY CORE

Alternatively, call inspect_recorded_crash with "include_debugger_context": true when the user has pwndbg configured for REA. Without either, there is only the faulting frame: say so in the report instead of guessing callers. With debug info (-g), addr2line -f -e BINARY <linked> gives the source file and line.

5. Classify the crash

Evidence Crash type Confidence
SIGSEGV, fault address below 0x1000 NULL pointer dereference high
SIGSEGV, fault address a small offset (below ~64 KiB) field read through a NULL struct pointer medium
SIGSEGV, fault address just below the stack pointer, or deep repeating frames stack overflow (runaway recursion, huge local buffer) high with repeating frames
SIGSEGV code 2 on a read-only or code mapping write to read-only memory (string literal, const data) high
SIGSEGV with pc equal to the fault address jump through a bad function pointer (freed object, corrupt vtable) medium
SIGSEGV code 128 (SI_KERNEL), no fault address general protection fault: non-canonical garbage pointer (use after free, uninitialized) medium
SIGABRT abort(): failed assert, uncaught C++ exception (std::terminate), or glibc heap check ("double free or corruption", "malloc(): ...") depends on the frames and the log message
SIGFPE integer divide by zero (or INT_MIN / -1) high
SIGILL trap instruction (ud2, __builtin_trap, a compiler-inserted UB trap) or a corrupted pc medium
SIGBUS access past the end of a truncated memory-mapped file, or misaligned access medium

For NULL and garbage-pointer crashes, find the register that held the bad value: decode the faulting instruction (gdb's x/8i $pc, or open_binary then analyze_function on the function from step 3; warn that the first Ghidra-backed query on a large binary can take minutes). The memory operand (mov (%rax),%eax with rax = 0) names the register; then follow where that register was loaded from. Pseudocode is decompiler output, not the original source: corroborate it with the assembly.

6. Find the root cause

The crash site is where a bad value was used. The fix belongs where it was produced: why the pointer was NULL (never allocated, a failed lookup, an unchecked error), who freed the memory, why the recursion never stopped.

  • With the source checkout, read the failing function and its callers, and git log -L or git blame the lines to see what changed recently.
  • Heap-corruption aborts point at the allocator that noticed the damage, not the code that caused it. Recommend rebuilding with -fsanitize=address,undefined -g and rerunning the failing case, which names the culprit. Running it is the user's call: ask first.
  • Use the log to tie the crash to an input: the last request, file or record processed before it died.

7. Write the report

Use this shape, in GitHub Markdown, so it can be pasted into an issue:

# Crash: <crash type> in `<function+offset>`

## Summary
<program> crashed with <signal>: <one sentence on what happened and where>.

## Crash details
| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Signal | SIGSEGV (code 1) |
| Fault address | `0x0` |
| Program counter | `0x...` |
| Location | `<function+offset> (<module>+0x...)`, `<file:line>` if known |
| Confidence | high / medium / low |
| Signature | <crash type> + top 3 function names in the user's code |

## Backtrace
## Faulting instruction and registers
## Likely cause
## Suggested next steps
## Evidence and limitations
- Core and binary SHA-256, REA Evidence IDs, gdb used or not
- Which facts were recorded (signal, registers), computed (function+offset)
  or inferred (crash type, cause)
- The program was not executed

The signature uses the crash type and function names only, never addresses or paths, so the same bug in many cores groups together. With several cores, triage each one, group them by signature and rank the groups by count.

Care

  • Cores are copies of process memory and can hold passwords, tokens and user data. Analyze them where they are; never paste raw memory or upload a core.
  • Reports include paths, register values and log lines. Point this out before the user posts one publicly.
  • Reproducing a crash means running the program. See the rule at the top: propose the exact command and wait for approval of that command; in an unattended run, only report it. The same applies to rebuilding with sanitizers and rerunning tests.