English version: See the corresponding English skill.
When to Use
- Need to handle mobile testing-related tasks in a real project.
- Need a result that can be directly used for execution, review, or follow-up.
Execution Flow
- Read and follow the main prompt in "Load on Demand" (coverage checklist, output structure, quality requirements).
- Only supplement project context that truly affects the result: scope, environment, constraints, risks, dependencies, expected deliverables.
- When information is incomplete, first provide a usable initial version and explicitly mark assumptions and information gaps.
- Default to Markdown; switch only when the user specifies another format.
Domain Execution Key Points
- Use production distribution, changes, and incident evidence to select a risk matrix of OS × device × install/upgrade path × network × foreground/background, note samples and uncovered combinations, and do not fabricate a support list.
- For deeplinks, preserve the original URI, decoding rules, routing/parameters, and authorization state; compare cold start, warm start, and restoration, and parameters must not be lost or double-decoded after restoration.
- For interrupted payments, record the order/operation_id and submission point; after restoration, the server-side read-back accounting and UI state must be consistent; if the response is lost, check the status first and do not pay twice.
- Verify data compatibility, permission changes, state after process termination, and resources for upgrades; unexecuted devices can only be candidates, and support scope conclusions must be separated from real device evidence.
Core Constraints
- Prioritize by risk/business impact; do not spread effort evenly.
- Write "confirmed facts" and "current assumptions" separately.
- Do not fabricate interfaces, fields, environments, or root cause details that the user did not provide.
- The result must be actionable: scenarios specific, prioritized, and able to guide the next step.
Load on Demand
-
When calibrating domain results, correct comparisons, or evidence gaps, read references/domain-decision-example.md 's desensitized inputs, item-by-item expectations, and recalculation basis.
-
Before producing output, you must read and follow
prompts/mobile-testing.md(minimum coverage checklist, output structure, quality requirements). -
When Excel/CSV/JSON/Word or other formats are needed: read
output-formats.md, and output according to the user's format requirements. -
When a ready-made template needs to be applied: read the matching template in
output-templates/, and do not invent a conflicting structure. -
When the user wants examples or to benchmark against existing assets: read the relevant samples in
examples/. -
When in-depth materials such as framework specifications, troubleshooting, or report schemas are needed: read only the files in
references/that are relevant to the current issue; do not read the entire directory. -
When format conversion or auxiliary validation is needed: prefer using the existing scripts in
scripts/rather than rewriting them. -
When evaluating/regressing this skill: use
evals/, and validate and run with skill-up. -
When the user only wants the shortest onboarding path: read
quick-start.md。
Pre-Delivery Self-Check
- Has followed the main prompt's output structure
- Minimum coverage focus: scope, device and system coverage, install/upgrade checks, core flows, permission handling, network and interruption behavior, push or deeplink (if relevant), performance or power consumption risks... (details are subject to the main prompt)
- Has covered the minimum checklist, or indicated why it was omitted
- High-risk items have clear priorities
- Did not fabricate details not provided by the user
- Assumptions and information gaps are marked
Common pitfalls
- When neither the scope nor the context is clear, do not pretend it is already fully usable.
- Do not write all items as equally important.
- Do not skip assumptions and information gaps.
- Do not output long passages of vague theory unrelated to the current toolchain.