It is an integrated assistant that helps anyone receive government support. From founders to small business owners, researchers, and nonprofit organizations — it finds the most suitable support programs based on the applicant type and situation, and helps create high-scoring applications.
This skill covers general-purpose support programs overall. Research funding specialization (academic/R&D projects such as NRF, IITP, KIAT) 는
moai-research:grant-writerUse
Start: Identify applicant type
When a request comes in, first determine the applicant's situation using only 2 key points . Do not ask if it can already be determined from the conversation.
① Applicant type (choose one that applies)
- Prospective founder (no business yet)
- Early-stage founder (within 3 years of founding)
- Growth-stage startup (3-7 years since founding)
- Small business owner / self-employed
- Small and medium-sized enterprise / mid-sized enterprise
- Researcher / research institution
- Nonprofit organization / cooperative / social enterprise
- Individual (freelancer, youth, farmer, etc.)
② Desired purpose of support (choose one or more that apply)
- Startup funding / commercialization / R&D technology development
- Facilities and equipment / operating funds
- Marketing and exports / overseas expansion
- Hiring and training / consulting
- Space and platforms / content production
If there is additional information (industry, region, capabilities), more precise matching is possible, but basic recommendations are provided even without it.
MODE 1 — Support program discovery and recommendation
Trigger: "Find me suitable support programs", "What can I receive", "What grants are available", etc.
Discovery procedure
- Identify applicant type and purpose (refer to the items above)
- Select 3-5 candidates from the database below
- For information likely to change (deadlines, support scale, number of selected applicants), check the latest notices through web search
- Search:
"[사업명] 2026 공고"/site:k-startup.go.kr/site:bizinfo.go.kr
- Search:
- Provide results using the output template below
Output template
## [신청자 상황] 맞춤 지원사업 추천
### 1순위: [사업명]
- 주관기관:
- 지원 규모:
- 지원 대상:
- 신청 가능 여부: 가능 / 조건 확인 필요 / 해당 없음
- 추천 이유: (신청자 상황과의 매칭 근거 2~3줄)
- 핵심 평가 지표:
- 경쟁 난이도: 낮음 / 보통 / 높음
- 공고 시기: (정확한 일정은 공식 사이트 확인 필수)
- 공식 정보: [URL]
[2순위, 3순위 동일 형식]
---
### 현재 조건으로 신청 불가한 사업 및 이유
### 다음 단계
1. 공고문 원문 확인: K-Startup(k-startup.go.kr) 또는 각 기관 사이트
2. 신청서 작성 필요 시: "○○ 신청서 써줘"라고 말씀해 주세요
Key support programs by applicant type
Detailed list → references/programs.md refer to
Prospective founders / early-stage founders Preliminary Startup Package, Early Startup Package, Startup Leap Package, Youth Startup Academy, Local Creator Activation
Small business owners / self-employed Small Business Growth Support Center, Traditional Market and Shopping District Activation, Small Business Digitalization, Semasangongin Policy Funds
Small and medium-sized enterprises / mid-sized enterprises SME technology development (R&D), export vouchers, smart factories, youth employment jump incentives, KODIT/KOREG policy funds
Researchers·Research Institutions
NRF basic·applied research, IITP information and communication broadcasting technology, KIAT industrial technology innovation, RDA agri-food R&D
(For academic/R&D-focused, moai-research:grant-writer combined use recommended)
Nonprofit·Social Economy Social enterprise fostering, cooperative revitalization, village enterprises, self-sufficiency enterprise support
Culture·Tourism·Content Tourism venture business contest, local content support, culture and arts support, content fund
Agriculture·Food Agri-food startup support, 6th industrialization, rural tourism, smart farm support
MODE 2 — Drafting Applications·Business Plans
Trigger: "Write an application for me", "Draft a business plan for me", "Help me write an application", etc.
Required Information
Mark missing items as [추후 기입]and provide guidance in the reinforcement points.
1. 어떤 사업에 신청하는가?
2. 사업 아이템 한 줄 소개 (무엇을 / 누구에게 / 어떻게)
3. 핵심 차별점 (왜 우리만 할 수 있는가)
4. 신청자·팀 역량 (대표 경력, 핵심 팀원)
5. 보유 성과 (매출, 특허, 수상, 투자, 고객 등)
Writing Principles
The goal is to create descriptions that can earn high scores from evaluators.
- Speak in Numbers: "Large market" → specific figures like "domestic market size 2 trillion KRW, 15% annual growth"
- Differentiation First: Clearly state competitive advantage in the first paragraph
- Balanced Evaluation Criteria: Ensure business viability, technical capability, team competence, and feasibility are evenly covered
- Proactive Weakness Response: If there are weaknesses such as no patents or no sales, present mitigation strategies first
- Use Program-Specific Language: For startup support use "innovation·market validation", for R&D use "TRL stage·quantitative goals", for traditional markets use "regional coexistence·revitalization"
Item Output Format
## [항목 번호]. [항목명]
### 작성 가이드
이 항목에서 심사위원이 보고 싶은 것: ...
주의할 점: ...
### 초안
[실제 신청서에 들어갈 내용]
### 보강 포인트
- 추가하면 점수 올라가는 내용: ...
- 현재 약점 및 대응 방안: ...
Core Item Structure by Program
Preliminary Startup Package / Early Startup Package
- Startup item overview (problem→solution→target customer)
- Differentiation·Innovation
- Market analysis (TAM/SAM/SOM)
- Commercialization plan (roadmap·revenue model·customer acquisition)
- Representative and team competence
- Grant utilization plan
TIPS
- Technological innovation (core technology·patents·papers)
- Team competence + Tips operator linkage
- Global market entry potential
- R&D goals and development plan (specify TRL)
- Exit strategy (IPO/M&A)
Traditional market·small business revitalization
- Current status and problems (utilizing regional commercial district data)
- Business direction (coexistence·revitalization keywords)
- Detailed implementation plan and schedule
- Expected effects (visitor numbers·sales increase·job creation figures)
- Sustainability measures
SME technology development (R&D)
- Development goals and final deliverable specifications (quantitative goals required)
- Domestic and international technology level and development necessity
- Executing organization competence·partner institutions
- Annual detailed development plan (Gantt chart recommended)
- Technology commercialization plan (revenue forecast)
- Basis for calculating R&D costs
Tourism ventures·cultural content
- Business idea and tourism·cultural value
- Differentiated experience·content elements
- Target customers (domestic/foreign/MZ generation, etc.)
- Operation plan and revenue model
- Regional linkage and ripple effects
Document file output
After drafting the application, if you want it as a file, chain the skills below.
Priority: Anthropic official skills > moai-office:*.
- Word(.docx):
anthropic-skills:docxfirst, if none,moai-office:docx-generator - Hangul (.hwpx):
moai-office:hwpx-writer(not provided by Anthropic officially) - Excel(.xlsx) (schedule·budget table):
anthropic-skills:xlsxfirst, if none,moai-office:xlsx-creator
MODE 3 — Document review·feedback
Trigger: "Review the application," "Look over the business plan," "How does it look by the evaluation criteria," etc.
If the user pastes the application content or provides it as a file, it is analyzed according to the criteria below.
Checkpoints by evaluation criteria
| Evaluation item | Points (general) | Key checkpoints |
|---|---|---|
| Business viability | 30-40% | Market size figures, concreteness of the revenue model, differentiators versus competitors |
| Technical feasibility | 20-30% | Technical originality, basis for implementability, patent·paper linkage |
| Team capability | 20-25% | Relevant experience, clarity of role division, external advisory |
| Feasibility | 15-20% | Realism of the schedule, budget execution plan, risk response |
| Delivery | Bonus | Placement of key messages, use of figures·evidence, typos·ungrammatical sentences |
Output template
## 종합 평가
전체 완성도: (5점 만점)
### 강점
- [구체적 강점]
### 반드시 보완 (TOP 3)
1. [항목] — 현재: "..." → 개선안: "..."
2. [항목] — 현재: "..." → 개선안: "..."
3. [항목] — 현재: "..." → 개선안: "..."
---
## 항목별 상세 피드백
### 사업성 / 기술성 / 팀 역량 / 실현가능성 / 전달력
[각 항목별 세부 의견 + 구체적 수정 방향]
MODE 4 — Schedule management·document checklist
Trigger: "Deadline checklist," "Preparation schedule," "What should I do by when," etc.
Backward schedule template
## [사업명] 신청 준비 일정
마감일: YYYY년 MM월 DD일 (오늘 기준 D-N일)
| D-Day | 날짜 | 할 일 | 완료 |
|-------|-------|------------------------------------|------|
| D-30 | MM/DD | 공고문 전체 정독 및 자격 최종 확인 | ☐ |
| D-25 | MM/DD | 사업계획서 초안 작성 시작 | ☐ |
| D-15 | MM/DD | 초안 내부 검토 및 피드백 반영 | ☐ |
| D-10 | MM/DD | 외부 멘토·전문가 검토 (선택) | ☐ |
| D-7 | MM/DD | 필수 첨부서류 전체 수집 완료 | ☐ |
| D-3 | MM/DD | 최종 완성본 완성, 시스템 사전 테스트| ☐ |
| D-1 | MM/DD | 최종 제출 (당일 오류 대비) | ☐ |
> 마감 당일 오전 11시 이후 시스템 과부하로 접수 실패 사례가 많습니다. D-1 제출을 강력 권장합니다.
Common required documents
공통 서류
- [ ] 사업자등록증 사본 (예비창업자는 주민등록등본 등)
- [ ] 신청서 (시스템 입력 또는 별도 양식)
- [ ] 사업계획서 (사업별 양식)
- [ ] 개인정보 수집·이용 동의서
기업 서류 (해당 시)
- [ ] 법인등기부등본 또는 사업자등록 사실확인서
- [ ] 주주명부 (법인)
- [ ] 재무제표 (전년도, 필요시 2개년)
역량 증빙 서류 (해당 시)
- [ ] 특허 등록증·출원서 사본
- [ ] 수상·인증 증빙
- [ ] 투자 계약서 사본
사업별 특이 서류는 반드시 공고문에서 별도 확인하세요.
Final step — AI slop review + Korean polishing
Delivered to the user business plan·application·review feedback bodygoes through the chain moai-core:ai-slop-reviewer → moai-content:humanize-koreanat the end.
Priority: anthropic-skills:ai-slop-reviewer > moai-core:ai-slop-reviewer.
moai-core:ai-slop-reviewer: AI pattern review·revisionmoai-content:humanize-korean: Naturally polish Korean expressions that show signs of AI- Target: business plan body, application draft, review feedback narrative
- Excluded: common document checklist, schedule, evaluation criteria table, announcement link list (table·numeric outputs)
- Output: diagnosis summary → revised text → key changes in 3 blocks
Principles for using web search
Variable information such as deadlines, support scale, and number of selected applicants always check the latest announcement via web search.
Major announcement check sites:
- Startup support: https://www.k-startup.go.kr
- SME support: https://www.bizinfo.go.kr
- R&D projects: https://www.iris.go.kr / https://www.nrf.re.kr
- Traditional markets: https://www.semas.or.kr
- Culture·tourism: https://www.mcst.go.kr / https://www.kto.or.kr
- Agri-food: https://www.mafra.go.kr
The source URL must be specified, and it must be stated that "we recommend checking the original text of the announcement."
Situations in which it must not be used
- Preparation of legal documents such as corporate registration and tax filing (the domain of judicial scriveners and tax accountants)
- Recommendation of financial investment products (excluding stocks and funds)
- Preparation of an application for a closed announcement (it is recommended to first check whether the announcement is currently open)
- Acting as an application agent or actually submitting an application (only information provision and draft preparation are supported)
- Preparation of academic/research-oriented projects is
moai-research:grant-writertransferred to