Automatically stage all changes, let LLM judge if new files are safe to commit, then generate Conventional Commits format commit messages in Chinese.
When to Use
- User wants to commit code changes
- User asks to generate a commit message
- User mentions "提交", "commit", "commit message"
Git Tag entry point
- When the user only asks to create a tag, upgrade the version tag, or explicitly invokes
/git-tag/$git-tag, use the adjacent git-tag skill, directly invokecyeam tag。 /git-tagdefault minor version upgrade;/git-tag majormajor version upgrade;/git-tag minor --dry-runpreview only.- When only creating a tag, do not enter the staging, commit message generation, or commit confirmation flow below.
- When the user asks to both commit and create a tag, first complete the user-authorized commit, then use
git-tag; an ordinary commit will not automatically create a tag. - Modifying the skill file itself does not mean a request to commit code or create a tag.
Conventional Commits Specification
Format:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
BREAKING CHANGE: <description>
Closes #<issue>
Co-authored-by: {model_name} <{model_email}>
All text must be in Chinese except type, scope, and special tokens (BREAKING CHANGE, Closes).
Types
| Type | Chinese | When |
|---|---|---|
| feat | New feature | New feature |
| fix | Bug fix | Bug fix |
| docs | Documentation change | Documentation only |
| style | Code formatting | Formatting, whitespace, semicolons (no logic change) |
| refactor | Refactoring | Neither new feature nor bug fix |
| perf | Performance optimization | Performance improvement |
| test | Test-related | Adding or fixing tests |
| chore | Build/tooling/dependencies | Build, tools, dependencies |
| ci | CI/CD configuration | CI/CD configuration |
| revert | Revert commit | Reverting a commit |
| build | Build system | Build system or external dependencies |
Rules
- Auto-stage all changes first. Run
git add .to automatically stage all modified and untracked files. Do NOT ask user togit addmanually. - LLM judges new file safety. For every untracked/new file, intelligently determine if it's safe to commit. Consider: filename, file extension, likely content, and purpose.
- If all files are safe, proceed automatically. No need to stop for confirmation on file safety if LLM determines all files are appropriate to commit.
- Analyze staged changes. Run
git diff --cachedto understand what changed. Never guess. - Determine type from changes, not from user description. If user says "update" but the change adds a feature, use
feat. - Scope is optional but recommended. Infer from changed file paths (package name, module name, directory). Use one scope per commit.
- Subject line: Chinese, imperative mood, no period, under 50 chars. Concise summary of WHAT and WHY, not HOW.
- Body: Chinese, explain WHY the change was made. Use numbered list for multiple changes. One change per line.
- Do NOT include HOW details (implementation specifics) in the message.
- Commit but do NOT push. Run
git commitonly. Nevergit push. - Must wait for user confirmation. After generating the commit message, show it to the user and wait for explicit consent. Before the user replies, executing
git commitis prohibited. If the user provides revision feedback, adjust accordingly and show it again for confirmation. - Use the current agent's question tool. Claude Code should use
AskUserQuestion. Codex should userequest_user_inputwhen that tool is listed, available, and permitted in the current mode. If no structured question tool is available or the tool call fails, ask the same question in plain text and wait for the user's reply.
Decision UI
For every user decision in this skill, use this order:
- Claude Code: use
AskUserQuestionwith the listedquestion,header, andoptions. - Codex: use
request_user_inputwith one question object. Includeheader, a stable snake_caseid,question, and 2-3 options. Put the recommended option first and suffix its label with(Recommended). - Fallback: if the current agent does not expose either structured question tool, or the tool is unavailable, not permitted, or fails, ask the same options as plain text. Do not continue until the user clearly chooses an option.
Never invent a tool name that is not available in the current runtime.
Pre-commit File Check
Auto-stage first: Always run git add . at the start to stage all changes automatically.
LLM File Safety Judgment
For every new/untracked file being staged, use LLM intelligence to judge if it should be committed:
Judgment Criteria:
- File type: Is this a source code file, config file, documentation, or binary/blob?
- File name: Does the name suggest it contains secrets, credentials, or temporary data?
- Project context: Does this file belong in the repository based on the project's language/framework?
- Common sense: Would most developers commit this file in a similar project?
Automatic Action Rules:
- ✅ Safe to commit: Source code (
.go,.py,.js,.ts,.java, etc.), config files (.json,.yaml,.yml,.toml), documentation (.md,.txt), tests, assets that are clearly part of the project. Proceed automatically, no need to ask. - ⚠️ Ask user: Large binary files, files with suspicious extensions, files that look like they might contain secrets, or files whose purpose is unclear.
- ❌ Auto-remove: Files matching the known bad patterns below. Auto-unstage these and inform user.
Known Bad Patterns (Auto-remove)
Auto-unstage files matching these without asking:
| Category | Patterns |
|---|---|
| IDE/Editor | .idea/, .vscode/, *.swp, *.swo, *~, .DS_Store |
| Build output | *.o, *.a, *.so, *.exe, *.dll, *.pyc, __pycache__/, *.class, *.jar, *.war, dist/, build/, out/, target/ |
| Dependencies | node_modules/, vendor/, venv/, .venv/ |
| Secrets/Credentials | .env, *.pem, *.key, *.p12, credentials.*, *.secret, id_rsa* |
| Log/Temp | *.log, *.tmp, *.bak, *.cache, .cache/ |
| OS files | Thumbs.db, Desktop.ini, .DS_Store |
Workflow
1. git add . → Auto-stage ALL changes (modified + untracked files)
2. git diff --cached --name-only → Get staged file list
3. Check for known bad patterns → Auto-unstage them, inform user
4. For remaining new files → LLM safety judgment
a. If all judged safe → Proceed automatically (no user prompt)
b. If uncertain/suspicious → Use Decision UI to confirm
5. If patterns suggest missing .gitignore:
- Check if .gitignore exists and already covers these patterns
- If not covered, propose .gitignore additions
- Use Decision UI to ask: whether to create/update .gitignore
6. Proceed with commit message generation
.gitignore Handling
- If
.gitignoredoes not exist in the repo root, offer to create one with appropriate patterns for the project's language/framework. - If
.gitignoreexists but misses patterns for the flagged files, propose appending the missing patterns. - Never modify
.gitignorewithout user confirmation. - If user confirms
.gitignoreupdate, stage the.gitignorechange and include it in the same commit with typechore.
Workflow
1. git add . → Auto-stage ALL changes (no need to ask user to git add)
2. git diff --cached --stat → Overview of changes
3. git diff --cached --name-only → Staged file list
4. Pre-commit file check:
a. Auto-unstage known bad patterns and inform user
b. LLM safety judgment on new files
c. If all safe → proceed automatically
d. If uncertain → stop for user confirmation
5. git diff --cached → Detailed diff (after any file removals)
6. Analyze: type + scope + subject + body
7. Add Co-authored-by trailer (fallback chain: model → client → omit):
a. **Detect model name** (priority order, highest first):
1. **Claude Code system prompt** - look for exact line: "You are powered by the model <model_name>"
2. `~/.trae/traecli.yaml` → `model.name` field
3. `$ANTHROPIC_MODEL` environment variable
4. Self-identify from system prompt metadata
b. **CRITICAL**: If system prompt says "ark-code-latest", use that EXACTLY. Do NOT translate to Claude 4.7 or any other model name"
c. **Infer provider** from model name prefix (see Provider Mapping below)
d. **If no prefix match**, infer provider from `$ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL` domain (see Base URL Fallback below)
e. **If still unresolved**, omit the Co-authored-by line entirely — never use "Unknown"
f. Format: `Co-authored-by: {model_name} ({provider}) <noreply@{provider_domain}>`
Provider Mapping:
| Prefix/Keyword | Provider | Domain |
|-----------------------|------------------|---------------------|
| ark-* | ByteDance (ARK) | volcesengine.com |
| glm-*, GLM-* | Zhipu AI | zhipuai.cn |
| claude-*, Claude* | Anthropic | anthropic.com |
| gpt-*, o1-*, o3-* | OpenAI | openai.com |
| deepseek-* | DeepSeek | deepseek.com |
| qwen-*, Qwen* | Alibaba Cloud | alibabacloud.com |
| doubao-* | ByteDance | bytedance.com |
| llama-*, Llama* | Meta | meta.com |
| gemini-*, Gemini* | Google | google.com |
| mistral-*, Mistral* | Mistral AI | mistral.ai |
Base URL Fallback:
| Domain Pattern | Provider |
|------------------------|------------------|
| volces.com / ark.* | ByteDance (ARK) |
| anthropic.com | Anthropic |
| openai.com | OpenAI |
| deepseek.com | DeepSeek |
8. ⚠️ MUST STOP: 使用 Decision UI 展示生成的 commit message 并等待用户确认
- question: "生成的提交信息是否符合要求?\n\n提交信息预览:\n```\n{commit_message}\n```"
- header: "提交信息确认"
- id: "commit_message_action"
- options: [
{ label: "提交并推送", description: "使用此提交信息进行提交并直接 push 到远程仓库" },
{ label: "确认提交", description: "使用此提交信息进行提交" },
{ label: "重新生成", description: "重新分析代码变更并生成新的提交信息" },
{ label: "取消操作", description: "取消当前提交操作" }
]
9. git commit -m "<message>" → Execute commit (only after user confirms)
10. If user chose "提交并推送": git push → Execute push (only after commit is successful)
11. Show git log -1 --oneline → Confirm result
Subject Examples
Good:
feat(user): 新增用户注册接口fix(cache): 修复缓存过期时间未生效的问题refactor(handler): 优化指标打点逻辑并调整handleBinlogMessage参数perf(query): 减少数据库查询次数chore(deps): 升级Gin框架至v1.9.0
Bad:
feat(user): 新增了一个用户注册的接口功能(too verbose)fix: fix bug(no scope, no detail)update code(not Conventional Commits)feat(user): add user register API(not Chinese)
Body Examples
Good:
refactor(handler): 优化指标打点逻辑并调整handleBinlogMessage参数
1. 重构emitCounter函数,移除固定name参数,内置指标名并通过tagkv传递维度信息
2. 调整handleBinlogMessage签名,新增topic参数用于传递binlog主题
3. 统一所有指标打点的标签格式,补充binlog主题、失败原因等维度信息
4. 调整日志和指标打点的关联逻辑,移除重复的指标调用
Co-authored-by: GLM-5.1 (Zhipu AI) <noreply@zhipuai.cn>
Bad:
fix: 修复了一些问题
- 改了代码
- 修了bug
(vague, no real information)
Edge Cases
- No changes at all: If
git add .results in empty staging area, inform user there are no changes to commit. - Mixed types in one commit: Pick the most significant type. If a refactor also fixes a bug, use
fixif the bug fix is the primary intent,refactorif the restructuring is the primary intent. - Multiple scopes: Use the most affected scope, or omit scope if no single scope dominates.
- Breaking changes: Always add
BREAKING CHANGE:footer in body. - Auto-removed files: After auto-unstaging known bad files, if no files remain to commit, inform user.