Overview
This skill providessingle-chapter or coherent multi-sectiondeep reconstruction capability, carrying out all-round academic-level rewriting of academic chapters through a systematic four-stage workflow (in-depth analysis -> solution design -> content reconstruction -> quality inspection). Core capabilities include: in-depth analysis of chapter intent, precise deconstruction of sentence meaning, re-sorting of writing logic, and intelligent reorganization and utilization of materials. The specific discipline and chapter numbering are determined by the user's project; this skill is not bound to a fixed topic structure.
Workflow Decision Tree
用户请求章节重构
↓
识别章节类型(绪论/综述/方法/实验/结论等)与在全文中的作用
↓
诊断问题类型(逻辑不清/组织混乱/表达不规范/素材利用不足)
↓
执行四阶段重构流程
↓
输出重构后的完整章节
Phase 1: In-depth Chapter Analysis
Core Tasks
-
Chapter Objective Analysis
- Identify the core scientific problems and technical objectives that the chapter aims to solve
- Clarify the academic status and role of the chapter in the entire paper
- Systematically sort out the technical innovation points and academic contributions to be explained in the chapter
- Consider the knowledge background and technical needs of the target readers
-
Technical Content Sorting
- Deeply understand the precise meaning of each technical term and concept
- Analyze logical relationships such as causality, contrast, and supplementation between sentences
- Extract core academic viewpoints and technical claims from scattered expressions
- Identify implicit technical assumptions and preconditions in the text
-
Logical Relationship Identification
- Analyze the logical structure and organization of the existing content
- Identify technical key points and innovation points in the chapter
- Discover logical problems and technical defects in the existing writing
-
Problem Diagnosis
- Diagnose the existing structural problems and logical defects of the chapter
- Objectively evaluate the academic value and technical significance of the existing materials
Phase 2: Reconstruction Solution Design
Core Tasks
-
Determination of Reconstruction Objectives
- Clarify the core objectives and academic positioning of the chapter reconstruction
- Design a new logical framework and main argument thread for the chapter
-
Design of New Logical Framework
- Redesign the core argument thread and logical development path of the chapter
- Reorganize the content according to "background-problem-method-validation-conclusion"
- Ensure logical progression and content coherence among subsections
-
Content Reorganization Strategy
- Formulate specific strategies for reusing materials
- Maximize the retention of valuable original technical content and experimental data
- Adjust materials to the positions where they can play the greatest role according to argumentation needs
-
Construction of Argumentation Chain
- Build a complete technical argumentation chain to avoid logical jumps
- Establish effective connections between materials and core viewpoints
Phase 3: Content Reconstruction Implementation
Core Tasks
-
Material Extraction and Reorganization
- Extract valuable original materials and reorganize them according to the new logic
- Retain all measured data and experimental results
- Reintegrate the theoretical derivation process to ensure logical coherence
-
Logical reorganization
- Rewrite the content of each part to ensure logical coherence
- Establish a clear chapter hierarchy and content organization
- Ensure that the parts form a natural logical progression
-
Academic expression optimization
- Unify professional terminology and improve the professionalism of academic expression
- Deepen the technical discussion and enhance the depth of theoretical analysis
- Highlight technical innovation points and strengthen comparative analysis with existing methods
- Standardize academic expression to meet the writing standards of a degree thesis
-
Technical detail integration
- Ensure that technical details serve the overall argumentation goals
- Integrate related content and establish a clear thread of technical development
- Improve the transitions and connections between the parts
Phase 4: Quality inspection and optimization
Core tasks
-
Logical completeness check
- Verify the logical completeness and coherence of the reorganized chapters
- Ensure that the entire chapter forms a complete argumentation system
- Check the logical progression between the parts
-
Academic standardization verification
- Check the professionalism and standardization of academic expression
- Verify the consistency and accuracy of terminology usage
- Ensure compliance with the writing standards and quality requirements of a degree thesis
-
Material utilization assessment
- Assess the degree of utilization and value embodiment of the original materials
- Check whether the placement of materials in the new framework is appropriate
- Confirm whether the materials play their greatest argumentative role in the best positions
-
Expression effect optimization
- Optimize the final expression effect and readability
- Ensure that the chapter hierarchy is clear and the primary and secondary arguments are clearly distinguished
- Verify that technical innovation points and academic contributions are fully reflected
Chapter-Specific Strategies
Differentfunctional typesof chapter restructuring strategies are shown in chapter-strategies.md(organized by types such as "review / data / methods / experiments / conclusion",without presupposingspecific chapter numbers or topics). Map your project's chapters to the corresponding types and consult them as needed.
Refactor Types & Methods
Different types of chapter problems require different restructuring methods; seerefactor-types.md:
- Type 1: Unclear main logical thread - Redesign the main argumentation thread and organize the content according to a standard academic framework
- Type 2: Chaotic content organization - Replan the hierarchical structure and present the theoretical framework, technical methods, and experimental verification in layers
- Type 3: Nonstandard academic expression - Unify professional terminology, deepen the technical discussion, and highlight innovation points
- Type 4: Insufficient material utilization - Comprehensively sort the existing materials and readjust their positions and presentation methods
Output Standards
The restructuring results must meet the following standards; seeoutput-standards.md:
- Logical coherence: The entire chapter forms a complete argumentation system, with logical progression among the parts
- Clear hierarchy: The chapter hierarchy is clear, and primary and secondary arguments are clearly distinguished
- Professional expression: Use standardized academic language and accurate professional terminology
- Prominent innovation: Technical innovation points and academic contributions are fully reflected
- Material preservation: Maximize the preservation of valuable original technical content and data
Working Principles
1. Principle of prioritizing deep understanding
- The technical content and academic intent of the entire chapter must first be analyzed in depth
- Accurately grasp the core technical issues and innovation points of the chapter
- Fully identify the academic value and technical significance of the existing materials
- Systematically sort out the logical relationships within the chapter and with other chapters
2. Principle of fully utilizing materials
- Maximize the preservation of valuable original technical content and experimental data
- Adjust the materials to the positions where they can play the greatest role according to the needs of argumentation
- Make the argumentative role of the materials more prominent through reorganization
- Ensure that the reconstructed chapter content fully covers the key points of the original chapter
3. Principle of logic reconstruction as the foundation
- Ensure that the reconstructed chapter has a clear main line of discussion and logical thread
- Establish a clear chapter hierarchy and content organization method
- Ensure that a natural logical progression is formed among the parts
- Build a complete technical argumentation chain and avoid logical jumps
4. Principle of improving academic quality
- Use standardized academic language and professional terminology
- Enhance the depth and academic value of technical discussion
- Effectively highlight technical innovation points and academic contributions
- Ensure compliance with the writing standards and quality requirements of degree theses
Resources
references/
- chapter-strategies.md - Reconstruction strategies by chapter function type (general)
- refactor-types.md - Reconstruction methods for different types of chapters
- output-standards.md - Output specifications and quality standards
These reference documents contain detailed implementation guidelines, specific strategies, and examples, and should be consulted as needed when performing reconstruction tasks.