SuperAPI AI Directory

cmux-review

Coding & development

View repository

Updated 10-15 14:13

About this skill

cmux Review

Review to reduce developer attention. Surface concrete correctness defects; suppress style, nits and speculative improvements unless requested.

Default pre-merge review

  1. Give a review subagent the task intent, base/head SHAs and exact diff. Ask for correctness first, then repository rules; keep discovery independent of the author's reasoning. Review policy edits against the base-branch rules.
  2. Verify concrete findings, fix them when authorized, and push. Re-run the original discriminator after repair. A green test counts only if it exercises the asserted failure; prefer red-before/green-after evidence.
  3. If fixes were non-trivial, obtain a fresh subagent review of the repair delta.
  4. Merge when the checks that judge the change pass and the approval rule below is met. Report findings with evidence, verification performed and coverage gaps.

Use subagents in the current runtime, not a second model or external review service as a gate. Keep review read-only until an authorized repair. Do not commit review receipts, scratch reproductions or generated logs.

Dogfood and merge

For implementation handoff or merge, read dogfood and merge for per-change verification, first-pass completion, re-dogfood and merge receipts. The main agent owns dogfood, approval, mergeability and every pushed fix. App/runtime/UI merges require the user's explicit approval after dogfood or a direct merge directive (merge, merge it, auto-merge; not finish, lgtm or ship it). main is nightly: stack fixes, do not revert.

Adversarial review

For security, persistence, concurrency, data-loss risks, or a requested deep review, use the full protocol:

These stages retain the advanced evidence protocol; ordinary reviews use the short default pass above.