Functionality
Conduct rigorous and meticulous evaluation and scoring of story text, analyzing story quality from multiple dimensions including market potential, innovation attributes, and content highlights.
Usage Scenarios
- Conduct novel initial screening to quickly determine work value
- Conduct multi-dimensional evaluation scoring of story text
- Provide judgment basis for IP adaptation potential
- Guide story creation and optimization directions
Evaluation Dimensions
1. Market Potential
Judge story's performance potential in the market.
- Audience Fit: Judge whether story aligns with target audience
- Discussion Heat: Judge whether story content can generate significant discussion热度
- Scarcity: Analyze whether story has sufficient uniqueness
- Performance Data: Analyze story's market prospects
2. Innovation Attributes
Judge whether story possesses innovation.
- Core Selection: Judge whether story's core selection is fresh and unique
- Story Concept: Judge whether story's concept is prominent and distinctive
- Story Design: Analyze from perspectives of theme, characters, worldview, and plot whether story design has originality
3. Content Highlights
Judge from story content level whether it possesses strong watchability.
- Theme Concept: Analyze whether theme concept is clear and definite
- Story Situation: Judge whether story situation has tension and dramatic quality
- Character Design: Judge whether character design is novel and distinctive
- Character Relationships: Judge whether character relationships are outstanding and distinctive
- Plot Segments: Judge whether plot segments have dramatic tension
Scoring Standards
- 8.5 and above: Excellent, possessing extremely strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation
- 8.0-8.4: Good, possessing strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation
- 7.5-7.9: Qualified, average competitiveness
- 7.4 and below: Poor, almost no competitiveness
Core Steps
- Deep Reading: Deep read story text to form independent understanding
- Dimension Scoring: Conduct rigorous and meticulous analysis and scoring of story according to evaluation dimensions
- Overall Evaluation: Form overall evaluation and score, provide recommendation on whether to continue development
Input Requirements
- Complete story text or story outline
- Story's genre and type (e.g., urban romance, historical fantasy, etc.)
Output Format
[Market Potential]:
- Audience Fit: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Discussion Heat: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Scarcity: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
- Performance Data: [Analysis and evaluation] Score: [score]
[Innovation Attributes]:
- Core Selection: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Concept: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Design: [Comprehensive analysis] Score: [score]
[Content Highlights]:
- Theme Concept: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Story Situation: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Character Design: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Character Relationships: [Analysis] Score: [score]
- Plot Segments: [Analysis] Score: [score]
[Overall Evaluation]: [Analysis and evaluation] Total Score: [score]
[Follow-up Recommendations]: [Development recommendations]
Constraints
- Evaluation must be based on provided story text content; do not independently create or add information
- Scoring should be objective and fair, accompanied by detailed analysis
- Recommendations should be specific and feasible, helpful for story improvement
Examples
See {baseDir}/references/examples.md for detailed evaluation examples. This file contains complete evaluation reports and analysis explanations for various story types (urban counterattack, sweet romance, suspense mystery, etc.).
Detailed Documentation
See {baseDir}/references/ directory for more documentation:
guide.md- Complete evaluation guide and framework explanationexamples.md- More scenario examples
Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.0 | 2026-01-11 | Optimized description field; added allowed-tools (Read) and model (opus) fields; optimized descriptions for functionality, usage scenarios, evaluation dimensions, scoring standards, and core steps; added constraints and examples sections |
| 2.0.0 | 2026-01-11 | Restructured according to official specifications |
| 1.0.0 | 2026-01-10 | Initial version |