SuperAPI AI Directory

ln-623-duplication-overabstraction-auditor

General & other

View repository

Updated 10-15 23:59

About this skill

Paths: File paths (references/, ../ln-*) are relative to this skill directory.

Duplication & Over-Abstraction Auditor (L3 Worker)

Type: L3 Worker

Specialized worker auditing duplication, over-abstraction, and unused extensibility.

Purpose & Scope

  • Audit duplication and over-abstraction (DRY/KISS/YAGNI)
  • Return structured findings with severity, location, effort, pattern_signature, recommendations
  • Emit MERGE_DUPLICATION, REMOVE_ABSTRACTION, or REMOVE_YAGNI
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10) for Duplication & Over-Abstraction category

Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and references/mcp_tool_preferences.md. Tool policy: You may run as an isolated subagent where host AGENTS.md is not in scope, so default to hex-line MCP first for file reads, search, and edits. Load references/mcp_integration_patterns.md only when MCP behavior is unclear.

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, best_practices, principles, codebase_root, output_dir.

Domain-aware: Supports domain_mode + current_domain (see audit_output_schema.md#domain-aware-worker-output).

Use hex-graph first when clone groups, implementations, or semantic relationships materially improve the audit. Use hex-line first for local code reads when available. If MCP is unavailable, unsupported, or not indexed, continue with built-in Read/Grep/Glob/Bash and state the fallback in the report.

Workflow

Detection policy: use two-layer detection (candidate scan, then context verification); load references/two_layer_detection.md only when the verification method is ambiguous.

  1. Parse context -- extract fields, determine scan_path (domain-aware if specified), extract output_dir
  2. Load detection patterns
    • MANDATORY READ: Load references/detection_patterns.md for language-specific Grep/Glob patterns
    • Select patterns matching project's tech_stack
  3. Scan codebase for violations (Layer 1)
    • All Grep/Glob patterns use scan_path (not codebase_root)
    • Graph acceleration (if available): IF contextStore.graph_indexed OR .hex-skills/codegraph/index.db exists:
      • DRY (1.1-1.10): audit_workspace(path=scan_path, verbosity="minimal", limit=5, clone_member_limit=3) -- each returned clone group = DRY candidate. Raise limits only for deliberate drill-down. Use clone kind and hotspot context for severity triage. Fall back to grep patterns if unavailable.
      • KISS inheritance: find_implementations(symbol) for abstract classes -- count implementations (1 = KISS candidate). Trace inheritance depth via graph.
      • Complexity: audit_workspace(path=scan_path, verbosity="minimal", limit=5) -- use returned hotspots to pre-identify complex functions for KISS/quality analysis. Raise limit only for deliberate drill-down.
      • Outline-first read: outline(file_path) before reading large source files -- understand structure before analyzing principles.
    • Follow step-by-step detection from detection_patterns.md
    • Apply exclusions from detection_patterns.md#exclusions
  4. Analyze context per candidate (Layer 2)
    • DRY: read both code blocks to confirm true duplication (not just similar naming or shared interface)
    • KISS: check if abstraction serves DI pattern (valid single-impl interface) or is premature
    • YAGNI: check if feature flag was recently added (intentional) or dormant for months
  5. Generate recommendations
    • MANDATORY READ: Load references/refactoring_decision_tree.md for pattern selection
    • Match each finding to appropriate refactoring pattern via decision tree
  6. Collect findings with severity, location, effort, pattern_id, pattern_signature, recommendation
    • Tag each finding with domain: domain_name (if domain-aware)
    • Assign pattern_signature for managed aggregation
  7. Calculate score using penalty algorithm
  8. Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/ln-623--{domain}.md (or 623-principles.md in global mode) in single Write call. Include <!-- FINDINGS-EXTENDED --> JSON block with pattern_signature fields for cross-domain DRY analysis
  9. Return Summary: Return minimal summary (see Output Format)

Two-Layer Detection

Detection policy: use two-layer detection (candidate scan, then context verification); load references/two_layer_detection.md only when the verification method is ambiguous.

All findings require Layer 2 context analysis. Layer 1 finding without Layer 2 = NOT a valid finding. Before reporting, ask: "Is this violation intentional or justified by design?"

Finding Type Layer 2 Downgrade Examples
DRY Modules with different lifecycle/ownership -> skip. Intentional duplication for decoupling -> skip
KISS Framework-required abstraction (e.g., DI in Spring) -> downgrade. Single implementation today but interface for testing -> skip
YAGNI Feature flag used in A/B testing -> skip. Config option used by ops team -> skip

Audit Rules

1. DRY Violations (Don't Repeat Yourself)

MANDATORY READ: Load references/detection_patterns.md for detection steps per type.

Type What Severity Exception (skip/downgrade) Default Recommendation Effort
1.1 Identical Code Same functions/constants/blocks (>10 lines) in multiple files HIGH: business-critical (auth, payment). MEDIUM: utilities. LOW: simple constants <5x Different lifecycle/ownership modules -> skip. Intentional decoupling -> skip Extract function -> decide location by duplication scope M
1.2 Duplicated Validation Same validation patterns (email, password, phone, URL) across files HIGH: auth/payment. MEDIUM: user input 3+x. LOW: format checks <3x Different security contexts (auth vs public) -> skip Extract to shared validators module M
1.3 Repeated Error Messages Hardcoded error strings instead of centralized catalog MEDIUM: critical messages hardcoded or no error catalog. LOW: <3 places User-facing strings requiring per-context wording -> downgrade Create constants/error-messages file M
1.4 Similar Patterns Functions with same call sequence/control flow but different names/entities MEDIUM: business logic in critical paths. LOW: utilities <3x Modules with divergent evolution expected -> skip Extract common logic (see decision tree for pattern) M
1.5 Duplicated SQL/ORM Same queries in different services HIGH: payment/auth queries. MEDIUM: common 3+x. LOW: simple <3x Different bounded contexts; shared DB is worse than duplication -> skip Extract to Repository layer M
1.6 Copy-Pasted Tests Identical setup/teardown/fixtures across test files MEDIUM: setup in 5+ files. LOW: <5 files Tests intentionally isolated for clarity/independence -> downgrade Extract to test helpers M
1.7 Repeated API Responses Same response object shapes without DTOs MEDIUM: in 5+ endpoints. LOW: <5 endpoints Responses with different versioning lifecycle -> skip Create DTO/Response classes M
1.8 Duplicated Middleware Chains Identical middleware/decorator stacks on multiple routes MEDIUM: same chain on 5+ routes. LOW: <5 routes Routes with different auth/rate-limit requirements -> skip Create named middleware group, apply at router level M
1.9 Duplicated Type Definitions Interfaces/structs/types with 80%+ same fields MEDIUM: in 5+ files. LOW: 2-4 files Types with different ownership/evolution paths -> skip Create shared base type, extend where needed M
1.10 Duplicated Mapping Logic Same entity->DTO / DTO->entity transformations in multiple locations MEDIUM: in 3+ locations. LOW: 2 locations Mappings with different validation/enrichment rules -> skip Create dedicated Mapper class/function M

Recommendation selection: Use references/refactoring_decision_tree.md to choose the right refactoring pattern based on duplication location (Level 1) and logic type (Level 2).

2. KISS Violations (Keep It Simple, Stupid)

Violation Detection Severity Exception (skip/downgrade) Recommendation Effort
Abstract class with 1 implementation Grep abstract class -> count subclasses HIGH: prevents understanding core logic Interface for DI/testing -> skip. Framework-required (Spring, ASP.NET) -> skip Remove abstraction, inline L
Factory for <3 types Grep factory patterns -> count branches MEDIUM: unnecessary pattern Factory used for DI/testing swap -> downgrade Replace with direct construction M
Deep inheritance >3 levels Trace extends chain HIGH: fragile hierarchy Framework-mandated hierarchy (UI widgets, ORM models) -> downgrade Flatten with composition L
Excessive generic constraints Grep <T extends ... & ...> LOW: acceptable tradeoff Type safety for public API boundary -> skip Simplify constraints M
Wrapper-only classes Read: all methods delegate to inner MEDIUM: unnecessary indirection Adapter pattern for external API isolation -> skip Remove wrapper, use inner directly M

3. YAGNI Violations (You Aren't Gonna Need It)

Violation Detection Severity Exception (skip/downgrade) Recommendation Effort
Dead feature flags (always true/false) Grep flags -> verify never toggled LOW: cleanup needed A/B testing flags -> skip. Ops-controlled toggles -> skip Remove flag, keep active code path M
Abstract methods never overridden Grep abstract -> search implementations MEDIUM: unused extensibility Plugin/extension point in public library -> downgrade Remove abstract, make concrete M
Unused config options Grep config key -> 0 references LOW: dead config Env-specific configs (staging/prod) -> verify before flagging Remove option S
Interface with 1 implementation Grep interface -> count implementors MEDIUM: premature abstraction Interface for DI/testing mock -> skip Remove interface, use class directly M
Premature generics (used with 1 type) Grep generic usage -> count type params LOW: over-engineering Public library API designed for consumers -> skip Replace generic with concrete type S

4. Evidence Gate

Do not report aesthetic preferences. A finding is valid only when the worker can show repeated code, an abstraction with no real variation point, or unused extensibility that adds maintenance cost.

Issue Required Evidence Action
Duplication matching code blocks, repeated validation/query/mapping, or pattern_signature repeated across files MERGE_DUPLICATION
Over-abstraction abstraction layer with one real implementation and no framework/testing need REMOVE_ABSTRACTION
YAGNI feature flag, config option, generic, or extension point with no current use REMOVE_YAGNI

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

Write report to {output_dir}/ln-623--{domain}.md (or 623-principles.md in global mode) with category: "Duplication & Over-Abstraction".

FINDINGS-EXTENDED block (required for this worker): After the Findings table, include a <!-- FINDINGS-EXTENDED --> JSON block containing all DRY findings with pattern_signature for managed aggregation. Follow references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

pattern_id: DRY type identifier (dry_1.1 through dry_1.10). Omit for non-DRY findings.

pattern_signature: Normalized key for the detected pattern (e.g., validation_email, sql_users_findByEmail, middleware_auth_validate_ratelimit). Same signature in multiple domains triggers cross-domain DRY finding. Format is defined in references/detection_patterns.md.

Return summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md.

When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-623--users.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Critical Rules

Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Do not auto-fix: Report only
  • Domain-aware scanning: If domain_mode="domain-aware", scan ONLY scan_path
  • Tag findings: Include domain field in each finding when domain-aware
  • Pattern signatures: Include pattern_id + pattern_signature for every DRY finding
  • Context-aware: Use project's principles.md to define what's acceptable
  • Effort realism: S = <1h, M = 1-4h, L = >4h
  • Exclusions: Skip generated code, vendor, migrations (see detection_patterns.md#exclusions)
  • Unique angle: Audit only duplication, over-abstraction, and unused extensibility. Do not audit delivery gates, security, package health, local complexity metrics, architecture boundaries, or runtime lifecycle.
  • Action required: Every finding uses MERGE_DUPLICATION, REMOVE_ABSTRACTION, or REMOVE_YAGNI.

Definition of Done

Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • contextStore parsed (including domain_mode, current_domain, output_dir)
  • scan_path determined (domain path or codebase root)
  • Detection patterns loaded from references/detection_patterns.md
  • All 3 checks completed (scoped to scan_path):
    • DRY (10 subcategories: 1.1-1.10), KISS, YAGNI
  • Recommendations selected via references/refactoring_decision_tree.md
  • Findings collected with severity, location, effort, action, pattern_id, pattern_signature, recommendation, domain
  • Score calculated per references/audit_scoring.md
  • Report written to {output_dir}/ln-623--{domain}.md with FINDINGS-EXTENDED block (atomic single Write call)
  • Summary written per contract

Reference Files


Version: 5.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-08