Preamble
echo "🚀 敏捷管理方案制定工具已启动"
Write-time boundaries
When only discussing, do not write files; during startup checks, do not create directories. When the user requests saving artifacts, first confirm the current product, the exact output path, and the overwrite/append choice for existing files; after confirmation,only immediately before the actual Writecreate the parent directory of that output file. For full installation, see skills/_shared/artifact-policy.md, and installing this skill alone also follows this paragraph.
Cross-Agent interaction rules
When the process requires interaction with the user:
- If the current environment supports AskUserQuestion, use AskUserQuestion (best experience).
- If the current environment does not support AskUserQuestion, you must ask the same question via a normal chat message.
- Ask only one question at a time.
- After asking, you must stop the current turn and wait for the user's answer (STOP and WAIT).
- Do not generate documents or write to docs before the user answers.
- Existing docs files cannot substitute for the user's answer in this turn.
Execution flow
Step 1: Understand the team's current state
Use AskUserQuestion:
📊 Team current-state assessment
Please select the team's size:
A) Small team (2-5 people) B) Medium team (6-15 people) C) Large team (16-30 people) D) Multi-team collaboration (more than 30 people)
Continue asking:
🔄 Agile maturity assessment
The team's familiarity with agile development:
A) First attempt (needs detailed guidance) B) Some foundation (familiar with basic concepts) C) Experienced (can optimize independently)
Step 2: Design the iteration cadence
Use AskUserQuestion:
⏱️ Iteration cycle planning
Recommended iteration cycle:
A) 1 week (fast iteration, suitable for the startup phase) B) 2 weeks (standard cadence, suitable for most teams) C) 3 weeks (complex projects, needs more development time) D) 4 weeks (large projects, high coordination cost)
Continue asking:
📅 Iteration meeting planning
Which iteration meetings are needed:
A) Standard meetings (planning meeting, daily standup, review meeting, retrospective meeting) B) Streamlined meetings (only planning meeting and review meeting) C) Custom meeting process
Step 3: Plan the task board
Use AskUserQuestion:
📋 Task board type
Choose a suitable board mode:
A) To do - In progress - Done (basic board) B) To do - Development - Testing - Done (standard board) C) To do - Analysis - Development - Testing - Acceptance - Done (detailed board) D) Custom board process
Step 4: Design the progress tracking mechanism
Use AskUserQuestion:
📈 Progress tracking frequency
How frequently progress tracking is needed:
A) Daily (daily standup + board updates) B) Weekly (weekly report + weekly meeting) C) Per iteration (statistics only at the end of the iteration) D) Real-time (automated tools + dashboard)
Step 5: Generate the agile management plan
Use the Write tool to generate docs/04-风控管理/敏捷管理方案.md。
Subagent parallel acceleration (new in v2.0.0)
Use Agent tools to execute independent subtasks in parallel, greatly shortening the total execution time.
Parallelizable Subtasks
After the user information collection in steps 1-4 is completed, the following two tasks can be executed in parallel:
| Subtask | Description |
|---|---|
| Iteration Cadence Derivation | Based on team size and agile maturity, derive the optimal iteration cycle and meeting frequency |
| Kanban and Tracking Design | Based on team preferences, design the task board column configuration and progress tracking mechanism |
Trigger Method
Before generating the document in step 5, use the Agent tool to activate parallel execution of subtasks.
V1 vs V2 Comparison
| Dimension | V1.1.0 (Serial) | V2.0.0 (Subagent Parallel) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iteration Cadence Derivation | The user answers 4 rounds of questions one by one | Agent analyzes in parallel, completed in one step | About 3 rounds of interaction |
| Kanban and Tracking Design | Design the kanban and tracking sequentially | Agent outputs two plans in parallel | About 2 rounds of interaction |
| Total Interaction Rounds | About 8-10 rounds | About 4-5 rounds | Reduced by 50%+ |
| Estimated Time | 8-12 minutes | 4-6 minutes | Saves about 5 minutes |
Output File
Agile Management Plan → docs/04-风控管理/敏捷管理方案.md
Output Document Template
# 敏捷管理方案
## 一、团队概况
- **团队规模**: [从步骤1提取]
- **敏捷成熟度**: [从步骤1提取]
- **迭代周期**: [从步骤2提取]
- **生成时间**: [当前时间]
---
## 二、迭代节奏设计
### 2.1 迭代周期
**周期长度**: X周
**选择理由**: [说明为什么选择这个周期]
### 2.2 迭代会议安排
| 会议类型 | 频率 | 时长 | 参与者 | 目的 |
|---------|------|------|--------|------|
| 迭代计划会 | 迭代首日 | 2小时 | 全员 | 明确迭代目标与任务 |
| 每日站会 | 每日 | 15分钟 | 开发团队 | 同步进度与问题 |
| 迭代评审会 | 迭代末日 | 1小时 | 全员+stakeholder | 展示成果 |
| 迭代复盘会 | 迭代末日 | 1小时 | 全员 | 总结改进 |
---
## 三、任务看板设计
### 3.1 看板列设置
**看板类型**: [从步骤3提取]
**列定义**:
- **待办(To Do)**: 已确认但未开始的任务
- **开发中(In Progress)**: 正在开发的任务
- **测试中(Testing)**: 开发完成,等待测试
- **已完成(Done)**: 测试通过,可发布
### 3.2 任务卡片规范
每个任务卡片必须包含:
- 任务ID(如: TASK-001)
- 任务标题
- 负责人
- 预计工时
- 实际工时
- 优先级(P0/P1/P2/P3)
- 标签(如: 前端、后端、设计)
### 3.3 WIP限制
建议设置在制品限制(WIP Limit):
- 每人同时在开发的任务数 ≤ 2
- 测试队列任务数 ≤ 开发人数
---
## 四、进度跟踪机制
### 4.1 跟踪方式
**跟踪频率**: [从步骤4提取]
**跟踪指标**:
- 迭代燃尽图(Burndown Chart)
- 任务完成率
- 阻塞问题数
- 团队速率(Velocity)
### 4.2 进度报告
**日报模板**:
```markdown
## 今日进展
- 完成任务:[任务列表]
- 进行中任务:[任务列表]
- 遇到问题:[问题描述]
## 明日计划
- 计划完成任务:[任务列表]
Iteration Report Template:
## 迭代概况
- 迭代目标达成情况
- 完成任务数 / 计划任务数
- 团队速率(故事点)
## 质量指标
- Bug数量
- 测试覆盖率
- 上线成功率
## 改进措施
- [下个迭代的改进点]
V. Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibilities | Key Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| Product Owner (PO) | Requirement prioritization, acceptance confirmation | Product Backlog, acceptance criteria |
| Scrum Master | Process advancement, problem solving | Iteration plan, risk report |
| Development Team | Task development, technical implementation | Code, technical documentation |
| Testing Team | Quality assurance, Bug verification | Test cases, test reports |
VI. Risk Management
6.1 Common Risks
- Frequent requirement changes → Establish a change review mechanism
- Accumulation of technical debt → Reserve 20% of each iteration for debt repayment
- Team collaboration issues → Regular retrospectives, continuous improvement
6.2 Risk Response Plan
Establish a risk kanban for real-time tracking:
- Risk level (red/yellow/green)
- Scope of impact
- Response measures
- Owner
VII. Tool Recommendations
7.1 Task Management Tools
- Jira: Powerful, suitable for large teams
- Trello: Lightweight kanban, suitable for small teams
- Feishu/DingTalk: Domestic teams, integrated collaboration features
- Linear: Modern tool, excellent experience
7.2 Collaboration Tools
- Document Collaboration: Notion, Feishu Docs, Yuque
- Communication and Collaboration: Slack, Feishu, DingTalk
- Code Collaboration: Git + GitLab/GitHub
VIII. Implementation Recommendations
8.1 Launch Phase
- Week 1: Determine iteration cadence, set up the kanban board
- Week 2: First iteration, get familiar with the process
- Week 3: First retrospective, adjust and optimize
- Week 4: Stable operation, solidify the process
8.2 Continuous Improvement
- At least 1 improvement measure per iteration
- Quarterly process review, major adjustments
- Stay flexible, avoid dogmatism
IX. Next-Step Recommendations
Recommended actions:
- /pm-cross (develop a cross-department collaboration plan)
- /pm-risk (identify project risks)
- /pm-release (plan the launch approach)
Output Quality Comparison
✅ Good Example:
- 有数据引用:「根据 Q4 数据,留存率从 35% 降至 28%」
- 有验证来源:「数据来源:Google Analytics, 2025-12-01」
- 有明确建议:「建议将新手引导步骤从 5 步减少至 3 步」
❌ Bad Example:
- 模糊结论:「数据表明留存率有所下降」
- 无来源:「根据经验,这个功能很重要」
- 没有行动建议:「留存是个问题」
Common Pitfalls / Red Flags — STOP
Stop immediately and backtrack if any of the following occur:
| Pitfall | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Drawing conclusions using "should", "probably", "seems" | Must be based on actual data and verification |
| Claiming completion without running checks | Verify first, then state |
| Skipping key steps due to time pressure | No exceptions; the tighter the time, the stricter you must be |
| The thought "this time it should be fine" | Re-verify every time |
Output Quality Check / Verification Checklist
- Prerequisite dependencies are met (input documents/data have been collected)
- All core steps have been executed
- Output document has been generated to
docs/directory - Every judgment is supported by data/evidence
- 2-3 follow-up skills have been recommended
⚠️ If any item fails → complete it before marking as done.
Project Status: Agile management plan has been developed Generation Time: [timestamp] Generation Tool: super-pm
---
## 推荐下一步
执行完成后,输出:
✅ 敏捷管理方案已生成!
🎯 建议下一步:
1. /pm-cross(制定跨部门协作方案)
2. /pm-risk(识别项目风险)
3. /pm-release(规划上线方案)