SuperAPI AI Directory

zheng-xie-assessment

Data & analytics

View repository

Updated 10-15 23:44

About this skill

Zheng-Xie Assessment — The righteous-pathogenic and deficiency-excess judgment framework

R — Original Text (Reading)

When upright qi is preserved within, pathogenic influences cannot encroach. — Huangdi Neijing · Suwen, Chapter 72, Cifa Lun

Where pathogenic influences gather, that person's qi must be deficient. — Huangdi Neijing · Suwen, Chapter 33, Ping Re Bing Lun

When pathogenic qi is exuberant, it is excess; when essential qi is taken away, it is deficiency. — Huangdi Neijing · Suwen, Chapter 28, Tong Ping Xu Shi Lun


I — Methodological Skeleton (Interpretation)

When facing any problem, before setting out to solve it, first make a qualitative judgment of the balance of power: Is it "insufficient self-strength" (deficiency), or "excessive external pressure" (excess)?

The Suwen uses the pair of concepts "righteous" and "pathogenic" to build this analytical framework: "Righteous" is the system's own capabilities, resources, and resistance; "Pathogenic" is external pressure, interference, and excess burden. "Deficiency" means righteous qi is insufficient — the system itself is weak and needs reinforcement; "Excess" means pathogenic qi is excessive — external pressure is too heavy and needs reduction.

The basis for judgment is to see where the problem occurs: if it is "where pathogenic influences gather" (the problem appears at a weak point in the defenses), it indicates that the essence is deficiency — one should supplement; if external pressure is clearly too great and causes the system to be overwhelmed, it indicates that the essence is excess — one should drain.

The deficiency-excess judgment determines completely opposite strategic directions: For deficiency, supplement (increase resources, training, investment); for excess, drain (reduce pressure, remove redundancy, lighten the burden). If the judgment is reversed — treating deficiency as excess and draining it (cutting back when capability is already insufficient) or treating excess as deficiency and supplementing it (adding more when the burden is already heavy) — it will only make things worse the more it is treated.

In reality, more common situations are mixed deficiency and excess: there is both self-insufficiency and excessive external burden. At this time, one needs to both attack and supplement — simultaneously reinforce the righteous and drain the pathogenic, using both hands together.


A1 — Application in the Book (Past Application)

Case 1: Deficiency-excess judgment and the strategy of supplementing and draining

  • Problem: How can one judge whether an illness is deficiency or excess? Should one use the supplementing method or the draining method?
  • Use of the methodology: The Tong Ping Xu Shi Lun gives a clear definition: "When pathogenic qi is exuberant, it is excess; when essential qi is taken away, it is deficiency." Excess is when external pathogenic qi is too exuberant (such as acute infection or blockage); deficiency is when internal essential qi is insufficient (such as chronic weakness or low immunity). After judging accurately, for excess use the draining method (sweating, vomiting, purgation, and other means of dispelling pathogenic influences); for deficiency use the supplementing method (warming, nourishing, benefiting, and other means of supporting the righteous).
  • Conclusion: The deficiency-excess judgment is the premise of all subsequent treatment decisions — if the direction is judged wrong, everything afterward is wrong.
  • Result: Only a physician who can accurately distinguish deficiency and excess can "succeed in every undertaking"; one who cannot distinguish them will "treat deficiency as excess and excess as deficiency" (treating the deficient as excess and the excess as deficient), thereby worsening the illness.

Case 2: The preventive logic of preserving upright qi within

  • Problem: In the face of an epidemic, why do some people become infected and others not?
  • Use of the methodology: In the Discussion on Needling Methods, the saying "When upright qi is preserved within, pathogenic influences cannot invade" is used to explain: external epidemic pathogens (environmental pressure) are certainly fearsome, but if one's own upright qi is sufficient, pathogenic qi cannot invade. The Discussion on Evaluating Febrile Diseases adds the reverse side: "Where pathogenic qi gathers, that place's qi must be deficient"—wherever pathogenic influences can break through, it must be because that place itself is weak.
  • Conclusion: The core of prevention is not to eliminate all external threats (impossible), but to ensure that one's own upright qi is sufficient—reinforce the weak links.
  • Result: People with abundant upright qi are not easily infected even when exposed to an epidemic environment, while those with deficient upright qi bear the brunt.

A2 — Trigger Scenarios (Future Trigger) ★

In what situations will users need this skill?

  1. Recurring low-level errors: The team/system repeatedly has the same problem, and the user needs to determine whether to strengthen capacity (tonify deficiency) or reduce excess burden (drain excess).
  2. The dilemma of resource allocation: When facing a predicament, unsure whether to "invest more resources" or "cut out what is unnecessary"—the directions are completely opposite, and a deficiency/excess judgment must be made first.
  3. Energy exhausted yet results poor: The user feels they have already worked very hard but results are getting worse, and needs to determine whether it is their own methods/capacity that are insufficient (deficiency), or whether they have taken on too many unnecessary burdens (excess).

Language signals (activate when these appear in the user's words)

  • "Should we strengthen or streamline?"
  • "The problem keeps recurring—how exactly do we fix it at the root?"
  • "I've already worked very hard but the results are poor"
  • "Is it insufficient resources or too many demands?"
  • "Is it a capacity problem or a pressure problem?"
  • "The harder I push, the worse it gets"

Distinction from adjacent skills

  • Difference from negative-feedback : Upright/pathogenic and deficiency/excess is about judging "deficiency (one's own insufficiency) or excess (external overabundance)" to decide the strategic direction, while excessive harm and restraint is about discovering "some force is excessively hyperactive" to introduce counterbalance. The former is a diagnostic framework (judging deficiency/excess), the latter is a regulatory framework (introducing restraint).
  • Difference from cascade-prediction : Upright/pathogenic and deficiency/excess focuses on the analysis of the balance of forces at a single point (enough vs too much), while transmission prediction focuses on the propagation path of a problem between different points.

E — Executable Steps (Execution)

After the skill is activated, the agent should execute the following steps:

  1. Assess upright (one's own strength) and pathogenic (external pressure)

    • List "upright": the system's capabilities, resources, reserves, resilience (such as team capability, funding reserves, system redundancy).
    • List "pathogenic": external pressure, interference, unnecessary burdens, harmful factors (such as unreasonable demands, redundant processes, noise interference).
    • Completion standard: Produce an "upright/pathogenic list," separately listing specific items of one's own strength and external pressure.
  2. Determine whether it is deficiency (insufficient upright qi) or excess (excessive pathogenic qi)

    • Core criterion: Is the location where the problem occurs a "place where upright qi is weak" or a "place where pathogenic qi is congested"?
    • If the problem is caused by a clear insufficiency in one's own key capabilities, judge it as "deficiency";
    • If the problem is caused by clearly excessive external pressure/burden, judge it as "excess";
    • If both are present, judge it as "mixed deficiency and excess."
    • Completion standard: Give a clear deficiency/excess judgment and explain the basis for the judgment.
  3. If deficient, tonify; if excess, drain; if mixed deficiency and excess, attack and tonify simultaneously

    • If it is deficiency: formulate a reinforcement plan — increase resource investment, improve training, and supplement key capabilities.
    • If it is excess: formulate a reduction plan — remove redundant burdens, simplify processes, and reject unreasonable demands.
    • If deficiency and excess are intermingled: use both approaches — simultaneously reinforce weak links and reduce excessive burdens, taking care to assign priorities.
    • Completion criteria: Produce an action plan, with each action labeled with its "reinforce/reduce" type and the corresponding basis for the deficiency-excess judgment.

B — Boundary (Boundary) ★

Do not use this skill in the following situations

  • Scenarios that can be precisely quantified: If the problem can be directly quantified with data (such as how much money is lost, how much capacity is lacking), there is no need to use a qualitative framework; directly calculating the data is more accurate.
  • Technical failures are not a comparison of strength: If the problem is a pure technical bug or configuration error, it falls under the category of "find it and fix it," and there is no issue of a deficiency-excess comparison of strength.

Failure modes the author warns about in the book

  • "Deficiency-excess confusion" — Suwen's most severe warning: treating a deficiency pattern as an excess pattern and reducing it (cutting resources that are already insufficient), or treating an excess pattern as a deficiency pattern and reinforcing it (adding more things to a system that is already overloaded). The direction is completely reversed, and the more you treat it, the worse it gets.
  • Using only one strategy — some people respond to everything with "reinforce" (add resources, add people, add processes), while others respond to everything with "reduce" (cut, lay off, simplify). Lacking deficiency-excess judgment leaves you with only one hammer.

The author's blind spots / limitations of the era

  • Suwen's deficiency-excess judgment mainly relies on external signals such as pulse diagnosis and is a qualitative judgment. In modern management/engineering, quantitative indicators can be combined to make a more precise comparison of strength.
  • In ancient times, "pathogenic factors" usually referred to clear disease-causing factors, whereas modern "external pressure" may be vague (such as cultural atmosphere or market sentiment), and the deficiency-excess boundary is not as clear as in ancient times.

Adjacent methodologies that are easily confused

  • "SWOT analysis" — SWOT lists strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats but does not give the strategic direction of "should strengthen or should reduce." The core of the healthy-pathogenic deficiency-excess framework is the strategic determination of reinforcing deficiency and reducing excess.
  • "Root cause analysis" — RCA looks for "why the problem occurred," while healthy-pathogenic deficiency-excess judgment concerns "should reinforce or should reduce." They are different questions.

Related skills (to be filled in stage 3)

  • depends-on: yin-yang-balance — Healthy-pathogenic deficiency-excess judgment is a specific application of yin-yang excess-deficiency analysis: "when pathogenic qi is abundant, it is excess" corresponds to yang excess (excessive external pressure), and "when essential qi is taken away, it is deficiency" corresponds to yin depletion (insufficient internal resources). The essence of deficiency-excess judgment is to conduct a qualitative analysis of yin-yang excess-deficiency between the healthy (yin) and the pathogenic (yang).
  • composes-with: observation-inference — Healthy-pathogenic deficiency-excess judgment requires inferring the state of internal healthy qi and pathogenic qi from external signals, and inference from the external to the internal provides the collection method of "multi-signal cross-validation." First use inference from the external to the internal to collect signals such as complexion/pulse/spirit, then use the healthy-pathogenic deficiency-excess framework to judge deficiency and excess, forming a complete diagnostic chain of "observation → judgment → strategy."

Audit information

  • Verification passed: V1 ✓ / V2 ✓ / V3 ✓
  • Test pass rate: {{%}} (see test-prompts.json)
  • Distillation time: 2026-04-18