SuperAPI AI Directory

root-cause-priority

General & other

View repository

Updated 10-15 23:44

About this skill

The Method of Locating Branch and Root

R — Original Text (Reading)

If disease comes first and then counterflow, treat its root; if counterflow comes first and then disease, treat its root. If disease comes first and then central fullness arises, treat its branch; if central fullness comes first and then vexation of the heart, treat its root. When disease arises with excess, treat from the root to the branch; when disease arises with deficiency, treat from the branch to the root. One who can understand the branch and root of the six meridians can be without confusion in the world.

— Yellow Emperor/Qi Bo, On the Root of Disease, Chapter 25; Guarding Qi, Chapter 52


I — Methodological Skeleton (Interpretation)

The Method of Locating Branch and Root is a decision-making framework for distinguishing the source of a problem from its endpoint and, on that basis, determining intervention priorities.

  1. Identify branch and root: In a causal chain, what occurs first/the fundamental cause is the "root," and what occurs later/the secondary symptom is the "branch." Spatially, the source (the extremities/the root) is the root, and the endpoint (the head, face, chest, and abdomen/the knot) is the branch.
  1. Determine order by urgency: By default, "treat the root" takes priority, but there are clear exceptions—"central fullness" (an acute condition/critical bottleneck) and "difficulty in urination and defecation" (blocked function) must be treated at the branch first. In acute cases treat the branch; in chronic cases treat the root.

  2. Deficiency and excess affect ordering: "When disease arises with excess, treat from the root to the branch"—begin treatment from the root; "when disease arises with deficiency, treat from the branch to the root"—begin treatment from the branch. In deficiency patterns the system's capacity to bear load is weak, so surface symptoms must be relieved first before tracing back to the source.

  3. Intermittent and severe proceed in parallel: "When intermittent, treat in parallel; when severe, treat alone"—when the problem is not too serious, branch and root can be treated together; when the problem is severe, focus can only be concentrated on treating one.


A1 — Applications in the Text (Past Application)

Case 1: The principle of treating the root when disease comes first and counterflow follows

  • Problem: If illness occurs first and then qi counterflow appears, which should be treated?
  • Use of the method: "If disease comes first and then counterflow, treat its root"—the primary disease is the root, and qi counterflow is the branch (secondary); treating the primary disease causes the qi counterflow to resolve on its own.
  • Conclusion: The order in which symptoms appear reveals the causal chain; treat the cause first and the effect afterward.
  • Result: Treating the root causes the branch to resolve on its own, avoiding wasted effort on secondary symptoms.

Case 2: The urgent priority of central fullness

  • Problem: If illness occurs first and then central fullness (abdominal distention) appears, in principle the root should be treated, but the central fullness is very urgent; what should be done?
  • Use of the method: "If disease comes first and then central fullness arises, treat its branch"—although central fullness is the branch (secondary), it blocks the core passage and must be resolved first.
  • Conclusion: When a branch pattern (secondary problem) threatens the core function of the system, the priority of the branch is temporarily raised.
  • Result: Resolve the urgent blockage first, then return to treat the root.

A2 — Trigger Scenarios (Future Trigger) ★

  1. Multiple entangled problems: Facing a pile of interrelated problems and not knowing where to begin.
  2. Tracing the causal chain: Knowing the manifestations but not being sure of the root cause, and needing to trace back along the causal chain.
  3. Treat the branch first or the root first: An urgent problem (branch) and a fundamental problem (root) exist at the same time and need to be ordered.

Language Signals

  • "There are too many problems; I do not know which to solve first"
  • "What exactly is the root cause"
  • "How to balance the urgent and the important"
  • "A is solved, and B pops up again"

Distinction from adjacent skills

  • Difference from excess-deficiency-decision : deficiency-excess tonification-drainage solves "direction(tonify/drain)", while branch-root and root-knot solves "order(first/later)". The two are independent but often used in tandem.
  • Difference from timing-opportunity : branch-root and root-knot is the priority of "what to do", while timing selection is the timing window of "when to do it".

E — Executable Steps (Execution)

  1. List all problems and build a causal chain

    • List all problems, and mark the causal relationships among them (A causes B, B causes C).
    • Completion criteria: there is a clear causal chain diagram, with temporal order marked.
  2. Distinguish branch and root

    • In the causal chain: what occurs first/the fundamental cause = root, what occurs later/the secondary manifestation = branch.
    • Completion criteria: each problem is marked as "root" or "branch", with the basis for the judgment explained.
  3. Check for urgent exceptions

    • Is there a "middle fullness type" problem—one that is not the root cause, but blocks core function and must be solved first?
    • Completion criteria: identify and mark urgent exceptions, and give the reason for priority adjustment.
  4. Determine the execution order

    • By default, treat from the root; if there is an urgent exception, treat the branch first; in deficiency patterns, treat from the branch first.
    • Completion criteria: give a clear execution order and the reason for each step.

B — Boundary (Boundary) ★

Do not use in the following situations

  • Problems are isolated: if there is no causal relationship among the problems, the branch-root framework cannot unfold.
  • Dogmatic root treatment: not all situations should "treat the root first"; urgent situations must treat the branch first.

Failure modes

  • Confusing branch and root: mistaking symptoms for causes, wasting effort on the branch while the root continues to worsen.
  • Dogmatism: insisting on "treat the root first" no matter how urgent it is, ignoring the threat of urgent branch patterns.

The author's blind spots

  • The branch-root in the Lingshu mainly focuses on temporal order and deficiency-excess; modern problems may also involve additional dimensions such as resource constraints and stakeholder priorities, requiring an expanded framework.

Audit information

  • Verification passed: V1 ✓ / V2 ✓ / V3 ✓
  • Test pass rate: {{%}} (see test-prompts.json for details)
  • Distillation time: {{DATE}}