Analysis Process
Step 1: Identify the Content Type
Determine the type based on the material's characteristics and adjust the analysis focus:
| Type | Characteristics | Analysis Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Long-form article | >1000 words, complete structure | Go through all analysis dimensions in full |
| Short content | Tweets, posts, <500 words | Focus on information density, shareable points, core insights |
| Video transcript | Colloquial, with time markers | Focus on pacing, colloquial expression, key moments |
Step 2: Output a Quick Summary
Before the detailed analysis, first output a 3-5 sentence core summary:
- What is this content?
- What is the core viewpoint?
- What is the most valuable point?
Analysis Framework
Analyze layer by layer according to the following dimensions. If information is insufficient, explain why.
I. Core Content
- Core argument: summarize in one sentence
- Key concepts: What key concepts did the author use? How are they defined?
- Article structure: How does the argument unfold? How do the parts connect?
- Evidence support: What specific cases, data, or authoritative citations are there?
II. Background and Context
- Author identity: Who is the author? What is their background and stance?
- Writing background: In what context was it written? What phenomenon or debate is it responding to?
- Writing purpose: What problem is it trying to solve? Whom is it trying to influence?
- Underlying assumptions: What unstated premises are there?
III. Critical Examination
- Possible rebuttals: What might the main objections be?
- Argumentation flaws: Are there any flaws, leaps, or biases?
- Applicable boundaries: Under what circumstances does the viewpoint hold? Under what circumstances does it not hold?
- Avoided issues: Has the author deliberately avoided any issues?
IV. Value Extraction
- Thinking framework: What reusable thinking frameworks or methodologies are there?
- Core inspiration: What is the greatest inspiration for the target readers?
- Cognitive change: What cognition of readers might it change?
- Internal tension: What oppositions or contrasts in the material can be used?
- Ability contrast (expert vs ordinary person)
- Cognitive contrast (expectation vs reality)
- Numerical comparison (specific potential energy gap)
- Usable scenarios: What scenarios is this topic suitable for entering from?
- Specific scenario, specific role, specific moment
V. Narrative Techniques (Optional)
Analyze only when the user requests it or when content writing techniques are particularly notable:
- Opening strategy: How does it open? Can it quickly capture attention?
- Trust building: How does it close the distance with readers?
- Emotional design: Where are the resonance points, curiosity points, and surprise points?
- Worth learning: What reusable writing techniques are there?
Online search
Search needed
- Cites specific data and is questionable
- Cites famous quotes and they are key to the argument
- Involves major controversial events
- The author is a public figure, and their background affects understanding
- Uncertain about key facts
No search needed
- Purely opinion-based, does not involve verifiable facts
- The data/events are common knowledge
- Fictional work or personal essay
Search principles
- When in doubt, search; do not guess or fabricate
- Label verification results:
[事实核查：原文称"XXX"，经查证为"YYY"] - If nothing is found, say "No relevant information found"
Execution requirements
- Answer each question one by one, do not skip
- Answers must be specific, citing the original text as evidence
- Avoid vague generalizations
- When information is insufficient, clearly explain the reason
- Short content may streamline dimensions two and three, focusing on core insights and communication value
- Before starting the analysis, first assess: does it contain factual claims that need verification?
Output format
Quick summary
[3-5 sentence core summary]
I. Core content
...
II. Background context
...
III. Critical examination
...
IV. Value extraction
...
V. Narrative techniques (if applicable)
...
Save results
After the analysis is complete, save as analysis.md, and add at the beginning of the file: