Create technical blueprints that bridge requirements and implementation. This skill teaches how to document architecture decisions, component design, and system interactions.
When to Use This Skill
Use design documentation when:
- Requirements phase is complete and approved
- You need to plan technical implementation
- Multiple developers will work on the feature
- Architecture decisions need documentation
- The feature involves complex integrations
Design Document Structure
Standard Template
# Design Document: [Feature Name]
Overview
[High-level summary of the feature and approach]
Architecture
[System architecture and component overview]
Components and Interfaces
[Detailed component descriptions and interactions]
Data Models
[Data structures and relationships]
Error Handling
[Error scenarios and response strategies]
Testing Strategy
[Testing approach and quality assurance]
## Step-by-Step Process
### Step 1: Requirements Analysis
Before designing, ensure you understand:
- All functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
- Constraints (technology stack, timeline, resources)
- Integration points with existing systems
**Analysis Questions:**
- What does the system need to do?
- What are the performance expectations?
- What existing code/systems does this touch?
- What are the security requirements?
- What could go wrong?
### Step 2: Research and Context Building
Identify areas needing research:
- Technology choices and alternatives
- Third-party integrations and APIs
- Best practices for similar systems
- Security and compliance considerations
**Research Documentation:**
```markdown
## Research Findings
### [Topic]
**Sources:** [Links/references]
**Key Insights:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
**Impact on Design:** [How this affects our approach]
Step 3: Define System Architecture
Document the high-level structure:
## Architecture
### System Overview
[How the overall system works]
### Component Architecture
[Major components and their responsibilities]
### Data Flow
[How information moves through the system]
### Technology Decisions
[Key technology choices and rationale]
Architecture Diagram (Mermaid):
graph TD
A[Client] --> B[API Gateway]
B --> C[Auth Service]
B --> D[Feature Service]
D --> E[Database]
D --> F[Cache]
Step 4: Design Components and Interfaces
For each major component:
## Components and Interfaces
### [Component Name]
**Purpose:** [What this component does]
**Responsibilities:**
- [Responsibility 1]
- [Responsibility 2]
**Interfaces:**
- Input: [What it receives]
- Output: [What it produces]
- Dependencies: [What it requires]
**API Definition:**
```typescript
interface ComponentName {
method(input: InputType): Promise<OutputType>;
}
### Step 5: Define Data Models
Document all data structures:
```markdown
## Data Models
### [Entity Name]
**Purpose:** [What this entity represents]
**Properties:**
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|
| id | string | Yes | Unique identifier |
| name | string | Yes | Display name |
| createdAt | Date | Yes | Creation timestamp |
**Validation Rules:**
- [Rule 1]
- [Rule 2]
**Relationships:**
- [Relationship to other entities]
**Example:**
```json
{
"id": "abc123",
"name": "Example",
"createdAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}
### Step 6: Plan Error Handling
Document error scenarios:
```markdown
## Error Handling
### Error Categories
1. **Validation Errors:** Invalid user input
2. **Authentication Errors:** Unauthorized access
3. **External Service Errors:** Third-party failures
4. **System Errors:** Internal failures
### Error Response Strategy
| Error Type | HTTP Code | User Message | System Action |
|------------|-----------|--------------|---------------|
| Validation | 400 | Specific field error | Log, return details |
| Auth | 401 | "Please log in" | Redirect to login |
| Not Found | 404 | "Resource not found" | Log, return error |
| Server | 500 | "Something went wrong" | Log, alert, retry |
### Recovery Mechanisms
- [Retry strategies]
- [Fallback behaviors]
- [Circuit breaker patterns]
Step 7: Define Testing Strategy
## Testing Strategy
### Unit Testing
- **Coverage Target:** 80%+
- **Focus Areas:** [Critical business logic]
- **Mocking Strategy:** [What to mock]
### Integration Testing
- **Scope:** [Component interactions to test]
- **Environment:** [Test environment setup]
- **Data Strategy:** [Test data approach]
### End-to-End Testing
- **Critical Paths:** [User journeys to test]
- **Tools:** [Testing tools]
### Performance Testing
- **Load Targets:** [Expected load]
- **Benchmarks:** [Performance requirements]
Decision Documentation
Document key decisions using this template:
### Decision: [Brief Title]
**Context:** [Situation requiring a decision]
**Options Considered:**
**Option 1: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]
**Option 2: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]
**Decision:** [Chosen option]
**Rationale:** [Why this option was selected]
**Implications:** [What this means for implementation]
Common Design Decisions
API Design
### Decision: API Architecture
**Options:**
1. **REST API** - Standard HTTP methods, well-understood
2. **GraphQL** - Flexible queries, single endpoint
3. **RPC-style** - Direct operation mapping
**Decision:** REST API
**Rationale:** Standard CRUD operations, team familiarity, good tooling support
Data Storage
### Decision: Database Choice
**Options:**
1. **PostgreSQL** - ACID compliance, complex queries
2. **MongoDB** - Schema flexibility, horizontal scaling
3. **Redis** - High performance, limited queries
**Decision:** PostgreSQL with JSON columns
**Rationale:** Data consistency needs + flexibility for user preferences
Authentication
### Decision: Authentication Strategy
**Options:**
1. **Session-based** - Server-controlled, simple
2. **JWT tokens** - Stateless, scalable
3. **OAuth 2.0** - External provider, no password management
**Decision:** JWT with refresh token rotation
**Rationale:** Scalability requirements, API-first architecture
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing design:
Completeness:
- All requirements addressed in design
- Major system components defined
- Data models cover all entities
- Error handling covers expected failures
- Testing strategy addresses all layers
Clarity:
- Design decisions clearly explained
- Component responsibilities well-defined
- Interfaces between components specified
- Technical choices include rationale
Feasibility:
- Design is technically achievable
- Performance requirements can be met
- Security requirements addressed
- Implementation complexity reasonable
Traceability:
- Design elements map to requirements
- All requirements covered by design
- Testing validates requirement fulfillment
Common Pitfalls
- Over-Engineering: Design for current requirements, not hypothetical futures
- Under-Specified Interfaces: Define clear component boundaries
- Ignoring Non-Functional Requirements: Address performance, security, scalability
- Technology-First Design: Let requirements drive technology choices
- Insufficient Error Handling: Plan for failures, not just happy paths
Example: User Profile Design
# Design Document: User Profile Management
## Overview
Enable users to view and edit their profile information, including personal details, preferences, and profile picture.
## Architecture
### Component Architecture
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │ Client │────▶│ Profile API │────▶│ Database │ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌──────────────┐ │ Image Store │ └──────────────┘
### Technology Stack
- API: Node.js with Express
- Database: PostgreSQL
- Image Storage: S3-compatible object storage
- Cache: Redis for session data
## Components
### ProfileService
**Purpose:** Manage user profile CRUD operations
**Interface:**
```typescript
interface ProfileService {
getProfile(userId: string): Promise<UserProfile>;
updateProfile(userId: string, data: ProfileUpdate): Promise<UserProfile>;
uploadAvatar(userId: string, image: File): Promise<string>;
deleteAvatar(userId: string): Promise<void>;
}
Data Models
UserProfile
| Field | Type | Required | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | UUID | Yes | Auto-generated |
| string | Yes | Valid email format | |
| displayName | string | Yes | 2-50 characters |
| bio | string | No | Max 500 characters |
| avatarUrl | string | No | Valid URL |
| preferences | JSON | No | Valid JSON object |
| updatedAt | timestamp | Yes | Auto-updated |
Error Handling
| Scenario | Response | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Profile not found | 404 | Return error message |
| Invalid update data | 400 | Return validation errors |
| Image too large | 413 | Return size limit error |
| Unauthorized | 401 | Redirect to login |
Testing Strategy
- Unit tests for validation logic
- Integration tests for API endpoints
- E2E test for profile edit flow
## Next Steps
After completing design:
1. Get design review and approval
2. Move to Task Planning phase
3. Break design into implementation tasks
4. Begin systematic implementation