SuperAPI AI Directory

ai-data-remediation

Data & analytics

View repository

Updated 10-24 16:17

About this skill

AI Data Remediation

Operate a self-healing remediation layer for mission-critical data pipelines: intercept corrupt or anomalous data, semantically cluster pattern families, generate deterministic fix logic via local or sandboxed language models, and guarantee zero data loss.

Core Principle

AI generates verifiable transformation logic — never touch or mutate production data directly.


Core Invariants

  1. AI Logic Over Raw Data Mutation: The model generates pure, deterministic transformation functions that can be tested, reviewed, and versioned. Raw model outputs are never piped directly into tables.
  2. Mandatory AST Static Validation: Every generated lambda or transformation must pass Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) validation against restricted namespaces before evaluation.
  3. Strict Zero-Loss Accounting: Total input records must exactly equal successful records plus quarantined records ($\text{Source} = \text{Success} + \text{Quarantine}$). Any non-zero delta immediately halts processing.
  4. Air-Gapped / Privacy-Preserved Execution: Sensitive or PII data must never egress to external cloud APIs without prior tokenization or local execution.
  5. Human Review Quarantine: Clusters with low transformation confidence ($< 0.75$) or failed AST checks route to an isolated quarantine table with full lineage.

Architecture & Map of Content (MOC)

[ Anomalous Records ] ──► [ Semantic Clustering ] ──► [ Sandboxed Logic Gen ] ──► [ AST Safety Gate ] ──► [ Vectorized Apply ] ──► [ Zero-Loss Audit ]
Component Responsibility Key Mechanism
Anomaly Buffer Staging buffer for records flagged NEEDS_AI Asynchronous staging table / queue
Semantic Compression Grouping high-volume anomalies into pattern families Vector embeddings + similarity clustering
Logic Synthesis Compiling deterministic lambda functions Prompt-constrained JSON output format
AST Security Gate Static code analysis & sandboxed execution Python ast.parse + restricted builtins
Reconciliation Audit Mathematical verification of record counts Strict invariant: $\Delta = \text{Source} - (\text{Success} + \text{Quarantine}) = 0$

Step-by-Step Procedure (TWI)

Step 1: Intercept & Isolate Anomalous Records

  • Action: Ingest failed rows from the deterministic validation layer into an isolated staging buffer.
  • Key Point: Operate strictly downstream of primary schema validation without blocking the main ingest stream.
  • Why: Decoupling remediation keeps upstream ingestion healthy and prevents system-wide backpressure.

Step 2: Semantic Anomaly Compression

  • Action: Compute vector representations of error strings and cluster them into distinct pattern families.
  • Key Point: Compress thousands of broken rows into 5–15 representative clusters using similarity metrics.
  • Why: Synthesizing 10 cluster-level transformation functions instead of 50,000 row-by-row LLM calls reduces execution time and compute cost by over 95%.

Step 3: Sandboxed Logic Generation

  • Action: Feed representative cluster exemplars to a constrained language model prompt that emits a pure Python lambda function.
  • Key Point: Restrict output to a single lambda definition with explicit input/output type contracts.
  • Why: Lambda functions are reproducible, testable against test suites, and easily inspected before deployment.

Step 4: AST Safety Verification & Vectorized Application

  • Action: Statically parse the generated lambda AST and execute across the cluster within a restricted environment.
  • Key Point: Reject any code containing import, exec, eval, __builtins__, file I/O, or OS calls.
  • Inline Checklist:
    • AST parsing verifies zero unauthorized node types (no Import, ImportFrom, Call to unapproved functions)
    • Transformation confidence score $\ge 0.75$
    • Lambda passes unit test assertions on 3 cluster sample inputs
    • Unverified or failing records route immediately to quarantine
  • Why: Unchecked dynamic code execution presents critical security vulnerabilities and risks catastrophic database corruption.

Step 5: Zero-Loss Reconciliation & Lineage Audit

  • Action: Run mathematical balance checks across input, output, and quarantine tables.
  • Key Point: Verify $\text{Source Records} = \text{Success Records} + \text{Quarantine Records}$.
  • Why: Silent row loss corrupts financial ledgers, analytical dashboards, and downstream dependencies.

Anti-Rationalization Guardrails

Tempting Rationalization Binding Rule Engineering Rationale
"The generated lambda looks safe, skip the AST check." Mandatory AST verification on 100% of generated code. A single unvalidated attribute access or system call compromises execution integrity.
"Only 3 rows disappeared, let's ship the batch anyway." Immediate halt if $\Delta \neq 0$. Silent record drops compound into major audit and financial discrepancies.
"Let's directly patch data strings instead of generating a function." Generate logic, never mutate raw data in-place. Logic can be audited, unit tested, reviewed, and rolled back; raw data patches cannot.
"Send full customer records with PII to public APIs for faster fix." Enforce data privacy boundaries. PII egress violates privacy regulations and compliance mandates.

Verification & Troubleshooting

  • AST Rejection: If the model attempts forbidden imports, tighten the system prompt to enforce pure mathematical/string transformations.
  • Low Model Confidence: Route the entire pattern family to quarantine_review table for human sign-off.
  • Reconciliation Discrepancy: Check row exception handlers to ensure failing rows are captured in quarantine rather than swallowed.